Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Serban Stan
dblp:203/4477
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6147-8337ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 61% Segmentation and scene understanding · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Model Adaptation for Continual Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
source-free domain adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Model Adaptation for Continual Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Model Adaptation for Continual Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
stochastic submodular maximization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Probabilistic Submodular Maximization in Sub-Linear Time · ICML 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › sublinear algorithms
sublinear-time algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Probabilistic Submodular Maximization in Sub-Linear Time · ICML 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Probabilistic Submodular Maximization in Sub-Linear Time · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › prototype learning
prototype-based representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Model Adaptation for Continual Semantic Segmentation · AAAI 2021 |
Data mining › feature engineering
subset selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Probabilistic Submodular Maximization in Sub-Linear Time · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-stage optimization · 0.6lazy greedy algorithm · 0.6variational embedding · 0.5prototypical distribution alignment · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Preserving Fairness in AI under Domain ShiftabstractExisting algorithms for ensuring fairness in AI use a single-shot training strategy, where an AI model is trained on an annotated training dataset with sensitive attributes and then fielded for utilization. This training strategy is effective in problems with stationary distributions, where both the training and testing data are drawn from the same distribution. However, it is vulnerable with respect to distributional shifts in the input space that may occur after the initial training phase. As a result, the time-dependent nature of data can introduce biases and performance degradation into the model predictions, even if the model is initially fair. Model retraining from scratch using a new annotated dataset is a naive solution that is expensive and time-consuming. We develop an algorithm to adapt a fair model to remain fair and generalizable under domain shift using solely new unannotated data points. We recast this learning setting as an unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) problem. Our algorithm is based on updating the model such that the internal representation of data remains unbiased despite distributional shifts in the input space. We provide empirical validation on three common fairness datasets to show that the challenge exists in practical setting and to demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm. Serban Stan |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Unsupervised model adaptation for source-free segmentation of medical images
Serban Stan |
Medical Image Anal. | 1 |
| 2022 | Domain Adaptation for the Segmentation of Confidential Medical Images
Serban Stan |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2021 | Unsupervised Model Adaptation for Continual Semantic SegmentationabstractWe develop an algorithm for adapting a semantic segmentation model that is trained using a labeled source domain to generalize well in an unlabeled target domain. A similar problem has been studied extensively in the unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) literature, but existing UDA algorithms require access to both the source domain labeled data and the target domain unlabeled data for training a domain agnostic semantic segmentation model. Relaxing this constraint enables a user to adapt pretrained models to generalize in a target domain, without requiring access to source data. To this end, we learn a prototypical distribution for the source domain in an intermediate embedding space. This distribution encodes the abstract knowledge that is learned from the source domain. We then use this distribution for aligning the target domain distribution with the source domain distribution in the embedding space. We provide theoretical analysis and explain conditions under which our algorithm is effective. Experiments on benchmark adaptation tasks demonstrate our method achieves competitive performance even compared with joint UDA approaches. Serban Stan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Probabilistic Submodular Maximization in Sub-Linear TimeabstractIn this paper, we consider optimizing submodular functions that are drawn from some unknown distribution. This setting arises, e.g., in recommender systems, where the utility of a subset of items may depend on a user-specific submodular utility function. In modern applications, the ground set of items is often so large that even the widely used (lazy) greedy algorithm is not efficient enough. As a remedy, we introduce the problem of sublinear time probabilistic submodular maximization: Given training examples of functions (e.g., via user feature vectors), we seek to reduce the ground set so that optimizing new functions drawn from the same distribution will provide almost as much value when restricted to the reduced ground set as when using the full set. We cast this problem as a two-stage submodular maximization and develop a novel efficient algorithm for this problem which offers $1/2(1 - 1/e^2)$ approximation ratio for general monotone submodular functions and general matroid constraints. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several real-world applications where running the maximization problem on the reduced ground set leads to two orders of magnitude speed-up while incurring almost no loss. Serban Stan, Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Andreas Krause 0001, Amin Karbasi |
ICML | 1 |