Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fatemeh Ziaeetabar

dblp:203/4521 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 56% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition › human-object interaction recognition
manipulation action recognition
0.312017
Semantic analysis of manipulation actions using spatial relations · ICRA 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › spatial reasoning
spatial relation reasoning
0.312017
Semantic analysis of manipulation actions using spatial relations · ICRA 2017
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.112017
Semantic analysis of manipulation actions using spatial relations · ICRA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic spatial relations · 0.3semantic event chains · 0.3axis-aligned bounding box relations · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Dynamic tokenization in the Transformer era: A review and taxonomy
Mohammad Mahdi Azizi, Bagher BabaAli, Fatemeh Ziaeetabar
Pattern Recognit.3
2024 Multi sentence description of complex manipulation action videos
abstract
Abstract Automatic video description necessitates generating natural language statements that encapsulate the actions, events, and objects within a video. An essential human capability in describing videos is to vary the level of detail, a feature that existing automatic video description methods, which typically generate single, fixed-level detail sentences, often overlook. This work delves into video descriptions of manipulation actions, where varying levels of detail are crucial to conveying information about the hierarchical structure of actions, also pertinent to contemporary robot learning techniques. We initially propose two frameworks: a hybrid statistical model and an end-to-end approach. The hybrid method, requiring significantly less data, statistically models uncertainties within video clips. Conversely, the end-to-end method, more data-intensive, establishes a direct link between the visual encoder and the language decoder, bypassing any statistical processing. Furthermore, we introduce an Integrated Method, aiming to amalgamate the benefits of both the hybrid statistical and end-to-end approaches, enhancing the adaptability and depth of video descriptions across different data availability scenarios. All three frameworks utilize LSTM stacks to facilitate description granularity, allowing videos to be depicted through either succinct single sentences or elaborate multi-sentence narratives. Quantitative results demonstrate that these methods produce more realistic descriptions than other competing approaches.
Fatemeh Ziaeetabar, Reza Safabakhsh, Saeedeh Momtazi, Minija Tamosiunaite, Florentin Wörgötter
Mach. Vis. Appl.1
2018 Prediction of Manipulation Action Classes Using Semantic Spatial Reasoning
abstract
Human-robot interaction strongly benefits from fast, predictive action recognition. For us this is relatively easy but difficult for a robot. To address this problem, here we present a novel prediction algorithm for manipulation action classes in video sequences. Manipulations are first represented using the Enriched Semantic Event Chain (ESEC) framework. This creates a temporal sequence of static and dynamic spatial relations between the objects that take part in the manipulation by which an action can be quickly recognized. We measured performance on 32 ideal as well as real manipulations and compared our method also against a state of the art trajectory-based HMM method for action recognition. We observe that manipulations can be correctly predicted after only (on average) 45% of action's total time and that we are almost twice as fast as the HMM-based method. Finally, we demonstrate the advantage of this framework in a simple robot demonstration comparing two different approaches.
Fatemeh Ziaeetabar, Tomas Kulvicius, Minija Tamosiunaite, Florentin Wörgötter
IROS1
2017 Semantic analysis of manipulation actions using spatial relations
abstract
Recognition of human manipulation actions together with the analysis and execution by a robot is an important issue. Also, perception of spatial relationships between objects is central to understanding the meaning of manipulation actions. Here we would like to merge these two notions and analyze manipulation actions using symbolic spatial relations between objects in the scene. Specifically, we define procedures for extraction of symbolic human-readable relations based on Axis Aligned Bounding Box object models and use sequences of those relations for action recognition from image sequences. Our framework is inspired by the so called Semantic Event Chain framework, which analyzes touching and un-touching events of different objects during the manipulation. However, our framework uses fourteen spatial relations instead of two. We show that our relational framework is able to differentiate between more manipulation actions than the original Semantic Event Chains. We quantitatively evaluate the method on the MANIAC dataset containing 120 videos of eight different manipulation actions and obtain 97% classification accuracy which is 12 % more as compared to the original Semantic Event Chains.
Fatemeh Ziaeetabar, Eren Erdal Aksoy, Florentin Wörgötter, Minija Tamosiunaite
ICRA1