Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alfarabi Imashev

dblp:203/5181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7250-5655ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › sign language technologies › sign language recognition
fingerspelling recognition
0.312017
Cyrillic manual alphabet recognition in RGB and RGB-D data for sign language interpreting robotic system (SLIRS) · ICRA 2017
Accessibility and assistive technology › sign language technologies
sign language recognition
0.312017
Cyrillic manual alphabet recognition in RGB and RGB-D data for sign language interpreting robotic system (SLIRS) · ICRA 2017
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › hand analysis
hand gesture recognition
0.112017
Cyrillic manual alphabet recognition in RGB and RGB-D data for sign language interpreting robotic system (SLIRS) · ICRA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.6RGB-D sensing · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Evaluating Large Language Models for Text-to-Gloss Translation in Kazakh-Russian Sign Language: A Pilot Study
Zhanibek Kozhirbayev, Alfarabi Imashev
LREC2
2025 An exploratory user study towards developing a unified, comprehensive assessment apparatus for deaf signers, specifically tailored for signing avatars evaluation: challenges, findings, and recommendations
Alfarabi Imashev, Nurziya Oralbayeva, Anara Sandygulova
Multim. Tools Appl.1
2024 Comparative Analysis of Sign Language Interpreting Agents Perception: A Study of the Deaf
abstract
Prior research on sign language recognition has already demonstrated encouraging outcomes in achieving highly accurate and dependable automatic sign language recognition. The use of virtual characters as virtual assistants has significantly increased in the past decade. However, the progress in sign language generation and output that closely resembles physiologically believable human motions is still in its early stages. This assertion explains the lack of progress in virtual intelligent signing generative systems. Aside from the development of signing systems, scholarly research have revealed a significant deficiency in evaluating sign language generation systems by those who are deaf and use sign language. This paper presents the findings of a user study conducted with deaf signers. The study is aimed at comparing a state-of-the-art sign language generation system with a skilled sign language interpreter. The study focused on testing established metrics to gain insights into usability of such metrics for deaf signers and how deaf signers perceive signing agents.
Alfarabi Imashev, Nurziya Oralbayeva, Gulmira Baizhanova, Anara Sandygulova
LREC/COLING1
2022 A User-Centered Evaluation of the Data-Driven Sign Language Avatar System: A Pilot Study
abstract
Sign Languages (SL) are a form of communication in the visual-gestural modality, and are full-fledged natural languages. Recent years have witnessed the increase in the use of virtual avatars as virtual assistants. Research into sign language recognition has demonstrated promising potential for robust automatic sign language recognition. However, the area of sign language synthesis is still in its infancy. This explains the underdevelopment of virtual intelligent signing systems. Additionally, existing models are often restricted to manually written rules and require expert knowledge, while data-driven approach could provide a better solution. Apart from the development of signing systems, research indicates a gap in the evaluation thereof by sign language users. In this paper, we propose a data-driven sign language interpreting avatar and its subjective evaluation. We present findings from a pilot study with the deaf evaluating two different avatars against a human sign language interpreter using the metrics that are believed to bring out important insights and narratives for the users in terms of their perceptions of the avatars.
Alfarabi Imashev, Nurziya Oralbayeva, Vadim Kimmelman, Anara Sandygulova
HAI1
2022 Crowdsourcing Kazakh-Russian Sign Language: FluentSigners-50
abstract
This paper presents the methodology we used to crowdsource a data collection of a new large-scale signer independent dataset for Kazakh-Russian Sign Language (KRSL) created for Sign Language Processing. By involving the Deaf community throughout the research process, we firstly designed a research protocol and then performed an efficient crowdsourcing campaign that resulted in a new FluentSigners-50 dataset. The FluentSigners-50 dataset consists of 173 sentences performed by 50 KRSL signers for 43,250 video samples. Dataset contributors recorded videos in real-life settings on various backgrounds using various devices such as smartphones and web cameras. Therefore, each dataset contribution has a varying distance to the camera, camera angles and aspect ratio, video quality, and frame rates. Additionally, the proposed dataset contains a high degree of linguistic and inter-signer variability and thus is a better training set for recognizing a real-life signed speech. FluentSigners-50 is publicly available at https://krslproject.github.io/fluentsigners-50/
Medet Mukushev, Aigerim Kydyrbekova, Alfarabi Imashev, Vadim Kimmelman, Anara Sandygulova
LREC3
2020 A Dataset for Linguistic Understanding, Visual Evaluation, and Recognition of Sign Languages: The K-RSL
abstract
The paper presents the first dataset that aims to serve interdisciplinary purposes for the utility of computer vision community and sign language linguistics.To date, a majority of Sign Language Recognition (SLR) approaches focus on recognising sign language as a manual gesture recognition problem.However, signers use other articulators: facial expressions, head and body position and movement to convey linguistic information.Given the important role of non-manual markers, this paper proposes a dataset and presents a use case to stress the importance of including non-manual features to improve the recognition accuracy of signs.To the best of our knowledge no prior publicly available dataset exists that explicitly focuses on non-manual components responsible for the grammar of sign languages.To this end, the proposed dataset contains 28250 videos of signs of high resolution and quality, with annotation of manual and nonmanual components.We conducted a series of evaluations in order to investigate whether non-manual components would improve signs' recognition accuracy.We release the dataset to encourage SLR researchers and help advance current progress in this area toward realtime sign language interpretation.
Alfarabi Imashev, Medet Mukushev, Vadim Kimmelman, Anara Sandygulova
CoNLL1
2020 Evaluation of Manual and Non-manual Components for Sign Language Recognition
abstract
The motivation behind this work lies in the need to differentiate between similar signs that differ in non-manual components present in any sign. To this end, we recorded full sentences signed by five native signers and extracted 5200 isolated sign samples of twenty frequently used signs in Kazakh-Russian Sign Language (K-RSL), which have similar manual components but differ in non-manual components (i.e. facial expressions, eyebrow height, mouth, and head orientation). We conducted a series of evaluations in order to investigate whether non-manual components would improve sign’s recognition accuracy. Among standard machine learning approaches, Logistic Regression produced the best results, 78.2% of accuracy for dataset with 20 signs and 77.9% of accuracy for dataset with 2 classes (statement vs question). Dataset can be downloaded from the following website: https://krslproject.github.io/krsl20/
Medet Mukushev, Arman Sabyrov, Alfarabi Imashev, Kenessary Koishybay, Vadim Kimmelman, Anara Sandygulova
LREC3
2017 Cyrillic manual alphabet recognition in RGB and RGB-D data for sign language interpreting robotic system (SLIRS)
abstract
Deaf-mute communities around the world experience a need in effective human-robot interaction system that would act as an interpreter in public places such as banks, hospitals, or police stations. The focus of this work is to address the challenges presented to hearing-impaired people by developing an interpreting robotic system required for effective communication in public places. To this end, we utilize a previously developed neural network-based learning architecture to recognize Cyrillic manual alphabet, which is used for fingerspelling in Kazakhstan. In order to train and test the performance of the recognition system, we collected four datasets comprising of static and motion RGB and RGB-D data of 33 manual gestures. After applying them to standard machine learning algorithms as well as to our previously developed learning-based method, we achieved an average accuracy of 93% for a complete alphabet recognition by modeling motion depth data.
Nazgul Tazhigaliyeva, Nazerke Kalidolda, Alfarabi Imashev, Shynggys Islam, Kairat Aitpayev, German Ignacio Parisi, Anara Sandygulova
ICRA3