Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Boerma

dblp:203/5230 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robot control
0.312017
Guidelines for the design and control of bio-inspired hovering robots · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
aerial robot design
0.312017
Guidelines for the design and control of bio-inspired hovering robots · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot dynamics
0.112017
Guidelines for the design and control of bio-inspired hovering robots · ICRA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

power consumption optimization · 0.3dynamical modeling · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Guidelines for the design and control of bio-inspired hovering robots
abstract
We study the dynamics of hovering mechanisms inspired by hummingbirds and bats to extract practical guidelines for the design and control of aerial robots. Using a dynamical model that incorporates wing flapping, pronation and folding, we determine the parameters for which hovering is possible. We show that the pronation angle (rotational degree of freedom for the wing about its span) significantly effects energy consumption of the system and demonstrate an optimal wing-beat frequency that minimizes the average power consumption. Furthermore, we show that increased body rotational inertia can significantly increase the energy consumption of hovering and can lead to implausible hovering trajectories. Last, we show that a bat-inspired hovering mechanism that allows for wing folding can generate plausible hovering behavior for larger aerial systems.
Hamid Reza Vejdani, David Boerma, Sharon Swartz, Kenneth Breuer
ICRA2