Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Larkin Flodin

dblp:203/8992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5857-5286ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 48% Coding theory · 24% Computational complexity · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › linear programming
approximate linear programming
0.412019
Linear Programming Approximations for Index Coding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Coding theory › network coding › index coding
broadcast rate
0.412019
Linear Programming Approximations for Index Coding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.412019
Superset Technique for Approximate Recovery in One-Bit Compressed Sensing · NeurIPS 2019
Coding theory › network coding
index coding
0.412019
Linear Programming Approximations for Index Coding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
one-bit compressed sensing
0.412019
Superset Technique for Approximate Recovery in One-Bit Compressed Sensing · NeurIPS 2019
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.412019
Superset Technique for Approximate Recovery in One-Bit Compressed Sensing · NeurIPS 2019
Information theory
signal processing
0.412019
Superset Technique for Approximate Recovery in One-Bit Compressed Sensing · NeurIPS 2019
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
support recovery
0.412019
Superset Technique for Approximate Recovery in One-Bit Compressed Sensing · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

superset technique · 0.4sparse hyperplane classification · 0.4linear programming · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Probabilistic Group Testing with a Linear Number of Tests
abstract
In probabilistic nonadaptive group testing (PGT), we aim to characterize the number of pooled tests necessary to identify a random k-sparse vector of defectives with high probability. Recent work has shown that$n$tests are necessary when$k$=$w$($n$/ log n). It is also known that O (k log n) tests are necessary and sufficient in other regimes. This leaves open the important sparsity regime where the probability of a defective item is~ 1/ log$n$(or$k$= 8 ($n$/ log n)) where the number of tests required is linear in n. In this work we aim to exactly characterize the number of tests in this sparsity regime. In particular, we seek to determine the number of defectives λ ($a$)$n$/ log$n$that can be identified if the number of tests is an. In the process, we give upper and lower bounds on the exact point at which individual testing becomes suboptimal, and the use of a carefully constructed pooled test design is beneficial.
Larkin Flodin, Arya Mazumdar
ISIT1
2019 Superset Technique for Approximate Recovery in One-Bit Compressed Sensing
abstract
One-bit compressed sensing (1bCS) is a method of signal acquisition under extreme measurement quantization that gives important insights on the limits of signal compression and analog-to-digital conversion. The setting is also equivalent to the problem of learning a sparse hyperplane-classifier. In this paper, we propose a generic approach for signal recovery in nonadaptive 1bCS that leads to improved sample complexity for approximate recovery for a variety of signal models, including nonnegative signals and binary signals. We construct 1bCS matrices that are universal - i.e. work for all signals under a model - and at the same time recover very general random sparse signals with high probability. In our approach, we divide the set of samples (measurements) into two parts, and use the first part to recover the superset of the support of a sparse vector. The second set of measurements is then used to approximate the signal within the superset. While support recovery in 1bCS is well-studied, recovery of superset of the support requires fewer samples, which then leads to an overall reduction in sample complexity for approximate recovery.
Larkin Flodin, Venkata Gandikota, Arya Mazumdar
NeurIPS1
2019 Linear Programming Approximations for Index Coding
abstract
Index coding, a source coding problem over broadcast channels, has been a subject of both theoretical and practical interests since its introduction (by Birk and Kol, 1998). In short, the problem can be defined as follows: there is an input P (p1,⋯,pn), a set of n clients who each desire a single entry pi of the input, and a broadcaster whose goal is to send as few messages as possible to all clients so that each one can recover its desired entry. Additionally, each client has some predetermined “side information,” corresponding to the certain entries of the input P, which we represent as the “side information graph” G. The graph G has a vertex vifor client i and a directed edge (vi, vj), indicating that client i knows the jth entry of the input. Given a fixed side information graph G, we are interested in determining or approximating the “broadcast rate” of index coding on the graph, i.e., the least number of messages the broadcaster can transmit so that every client recovers its desired information. The complexity of determining this broadcast rate in the most general case is open, and the best-known approximations are barely better than the trivial O(n)-approximation corresponding to sending each client their information directly without performing any coding. Using index coding schemes based on linear programs (LPs), we take a two-pronged approach to approximating the broadcast rate. First, extending earlier work on planar graphs, we focus on approximating the broadcast rate for special graph families, such as graphs with the small chromatic number and disk graphs. In certain cases, we are able to show that simple LP-based schemes give constant-factor approximations of the broadcast rate, which seem extremely difficult to obtain in the general case. Second, we provide several LP-based schemes for the general case, which are not constant-factor approximations, but which strictly improve on the best-known schemes. These can be viewed as both a strengthening of the constant-factor approximations proven for special graph families (as these schemes strictly improve on those which we prove are good approximations), as well as another tool that can be used either in practice or in future theoretical analyses.
Larkin Flodin, Arya Mazumdar
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2017 Estimation of sparsity via simple measurements
abstract
We consider several related problems of estimating the `sparsity' or number of nonzero elements d in a length n vector x by observing only b = M ⊙ x, where M is a predesigned test matrix independent of x, and the operation ⊙ varies between problems. We aim to provide a Δ-approximation of sparsity for some constant Δ with a minimal number of measurements (rows of M). This framework generalizes multiple problems, such as estimation of sparsity in group testing and compressed sensing. We use techniques from coding theory as well as probabilistic methods to show that O(D log D log n) rows are sufficient when the operation ⊙ is logical OR (i.e., group testing), and nearly this many are necessary, where D is a known upper bound on d. When instead the operation ⊙ is multiplication over R or a finite field, we show that respectively Θ(D) and Θ(D log n/D) measurements are necessary and sufficient.
Larkin Flodin, Arya Mazumdar
ISIT2