Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florin Brad

dblp:203/9164 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 57% Information extraction and text analysis · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › authorship analysis
authorship verification
0.612022
Rethinking the Authorship Verification Experimental Setups · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias evaluation
0.612022
Rethinking the Authorship Verification Experimental Setups · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.612022
AnoShift: A Distribution Shift Benchmark for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
0.612022
Rethinking the Authorship Verification Experimental Setups · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
Rethinking the Authorship Verification Experimental Setups · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
non-stationary data
0.612022
AnoShift: A Distribution Shift Benchmark for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining
stylometry
0.612022
VeriDark: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Authorship Verification on the Dark Web · NeurIPS 2022
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.612022
AnoShift: A Distribution Shift Benchmark for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022
Data mining › anomaly detection
unsupervised anomaly detection
0.612022
AnoShift: A Distribution Shift Benchmark for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022
Digital forensics and information hiding › authorship attribution
authorship verification
0.612022
VeriDark: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Authorship Verification on the Dark Web · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

t-SNE · 1.1optimal transport · 1.1NLP baselines · 1.1explainable AI · 0.6BERT · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Rethinking the Authorship Verification Experimental Setups
abstract
One of the main drivers of the recent advances in authorship verification is the PAN large-scale authorship dataset.Despite generating significant progress in the field, inconsistent performance differences between the closed and open test sets have been reported.To this end, we improve the experimental setup by proposing five new public splits over the PAN dataset, specifically designed to isolate and identify biases related to the text topic and to the author's writing style.We evaluate several BERT-like baselines on these splits, showing that such models are competitive with authorship verification state-of-the-art methods.Furthermore, using explainable AI, we find that these baselines are biased towards named entities.We show that models trained without the named entities obtain better results and generalize better when tested on DarkReddit, our new dataset for authorship verification.Test split O2D2 * O2D2 BERT Naive † Comp.† Closed 93.5 96.4 95.6 75.6 72.2 Clopen 94.0 96.0 97.4 74.1 71.1 Open UA 92.6 92.6 90.2 78.6 68.5 Open UF 91.4 95.1 91.6 79.9 79.0 Open All 80.6 67.5 88.7 75.6 76.9 PAN Closed 93.3 93.5 -74.7 74.2 PAN Open 93.3 94.4 -75.3 74.
Florin Brad, Andrei Manolache, Elena Burceanu, Antonio Barbalau, Radu Tudor Ionescu, Marius Popescu
EMNLP1
2022 AnoShift: A Distribution Shift Benchmark for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
abstract
Analyzing the distribution shift of data is a growing research direction in nowadays Machine Learning (ML), leading to emerging new benchmarks that focus on providing a suitable scenario for studying the generalization properties of ML models. The existing benchmarks are focused on supervised learning, and to the best of our knowledge, there is none for unsupervised learning. Therefore, we introduce an unsupervised anomaly detection benchmark with data that shifts over time, built over Kyoto-2006+, a traffic dataset for network intrusion detection. This type of data meets the premise of shifting the input distribution: it covers a large time span (10 years), with naturally occurring changes over time (e.g. users modifying their behavior patterns, and software updates). We first highlight the non-stationary nature of the data, using a basic per-feature analysis, t-SNE, and an Optimal Transport approach for measuring the overall distribution distances between years. Next, we propose AnoShift, a protocol splitting the data in IID, NEAR, and FAR testing splits. We validate the performance degradation over time with diverse models, ranging from classical approaches to deep learning. Finally, we show that by acknowledging the distribution shift problem and properly addressing it, the performance can be improved compared to the classical training which assumes independent and identically distributed data (on average, by up to 3% for our approach). Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/bit-ml/AnoShift/.
Marius Dragoi, Elena Burceanu, Emanuela Haller, Andrei Manolache, Florin Brad
NeurIPS5
2022 VeriDark: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Authorship Verification on the Dark Web
abstract
The Dark Web represents a hotbed for illicit activity, where users communicate on different market forums in order to exchange goods and services. Law enforcement agencies benefit from forensic tools that perform authorship analysis, in order to identify and profile users based on their textual content. However, authorship analysis has been traditionally studied using corpora featuring literary texts such as fragments from novels or fan fiction, which may not be suitable in a cybercrime context. Moreover, the few works that employ authorship analysis tools for cybercrime prevention usually employ ad-hoc experimental setups and datasets. To address these issues, we release VeriDark: a benchmark comprised of three large scale authorship verification datasets and one authorship identification dataset obtained from user activity from either Dark Web related Reddit communities or popular illicit Dark Web market forums. We evaluate competitive NLP baselines on the three datasets and perform an analysis of the predictions to better understand the limitations of such approaches. We make the datasets and baselines publicly available at https://github.com/bit-ml/VeriDark .
Andrei Manolache, Florin Brad, Antonio Barbalau, Radu Tudor Ionescu, Marius Popescu
NeurIPS2
2021 DATE: Detecting Anomalies in Text via Self-Supervision of Transformers
abstract
Leveraging deep learning models for Anomaly Detection (AD) has seen widespread use in recent years due to superior performances over traditional methods.Recent deep methods for anomalies in images learn better features of normality in an end-to-end self-supervised setting.These methods train a model to discriminate between different transformations applied to visual data and then use the output to compute an anomaly score.We use this approach for AD in text, by introducing a novel pretext task on text sequences.We learn our DATE model end-to-end, enforcing two independent and complementary self-supervision signals, one at the token-level and one at the sequencelevel.Under this new task formulation, we show strong quantitative and qualitative results on the 20Newsgroups and AG News datasets.In the semi-supervised setting, we outperform state-of-the-art results by +13.5% and +6.9%, respectively (AUROC).In the unsupervised configuration, DATE surpasses all other methods even when 10% of its training data is contaminated with outliers (compared with 0% for the others).
Andrei Manolache, Florin Brad, Elena Burceanu
NAACL-HLT2
2020 Neural Approaches for Natural Language Interfaces to Databases: A Survey
abstract
Radu Cristian Alexandru Iacob, Florin Brad, Elena-Simona Apostol, Ciprian-Octavian Truică, Ionel Alexandru Hosu, Traian Rebedea. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2020.
Radu Cristian Alexandru Iacob, Florin Brad, Elena Apostol, Ciprian-Octavian Truica, Ionel-Alexandru Hosu, Traian Rebedea
COLING2
2018 Natural Language Interface for Databases Using a Dual-Encoder Model
abstract
We propose a sketch-based two-step neural model for generating structured queries (SQL) based on a user’s request in natural language. The sketch is obtained by using placeholders for specific entities in the SQL query, such as column names, table names, aliases and variables, in a process similar to semantic parsing. The first step is to apply a sequence-to-sequence (SEQ2SEQ) model to determine the most probable SQL sketch based on the request in natural language. Then, a second network designed as a dual-encoder SEQ2SEQ model using both the text query and the previously obtained sketch is employed to generate the final SQL query. Our approach shows improvements over previous approaches on two recent large datasets (WikiSQL and SENLIDB) suitable for data-driven solutions for natural language interfaces for databases.
Ionel-Alexandru Hosu, Radu Cristian Alexandru Iacob, Florin Brad, Stefan Ruseti, Traian Rebedea
COLING3
2018 A Syntax-Guided Neural Model for Natural Language Interfaces to Databases
abstract
Recent advances in neural code generation have incorporated syntax to improve the generation of the target code based on the user's request in natural language. We adapt the model of [1] to the Natural Language Interface to Databases (NLIDB) problem by taking into account the database schema. We evaluate our model on the recently introduced WIKISQL and SENLIDB datasets. Our results show that the syntax-guided model outperforms a simple sequence-to-sequence (SEQ2SEQ) baseline on WIKISQL, but has trouble with the SENLIDB dataset due to its complexity.
Florin Brad, Radu Cristian Alexandru Iacob, Ionel-Alexandru Hosu, Stefan Ruseti, Traian Rebedea
ICTAI1
2017 Dataset for a Neural Natural Language Interface for Databases (NNLIDB)
abstract
Progress in natural language interfaces to databases (NLIDB) has been slow mainly due to linguistic issues (such as language ambiguity) and domain portability. Moreover, the lack of a large corpus to be used as a standard benchmark has made data-driven approaches difficult to develop and compare. In this paper, we revisit the problem of NLIDBs and recast it as a sequence translation problem. To this end, we introduce a large dataset extracted from the Stack Exchange Data Explorer website, which can be used for training neural natural language interfaces for databases. We also report encouraging baseline results on a smaller manually annotated test corpus, obtained using an attention-based sequence-to-sequence neural network.
Florin Brad, Radu Cristian Alexandru Iacob, Ionel-Alexandru Hosu, Traian Rebedea
IJCNLP(1)1
2017 Neural Paraphrase Generation using Transfer Learning
abstract
Progress in statistical paraphrase generation has been hindered for a long time by the lack of large monolingual parallel corpora.In this paper, we adapt the neural machine translation approach to paraphrase generation and perform transfer learning from the closely related task of entailment generation.We evaluate the model on the Microsoft Research Paraphrase (MSRP) corpus and show that the model is able to generate sentences that capture part of the original meaning, but fails to pick up on important words or to show large lexical variation.
Florin Brad, Traian Rebedea
INLG1