Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nana Tang

dblp:204/5274 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 50% Distributed systems · 38% High-performance computing · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training
1.012026
AutoHAAP: Automated Heterogeneity-Aware Asymmetric Partitioning for LLM Training · HPCA 2026
Parallel and multicore computing
parallelization strategies
1.012026
AutoHAAP: Automated Heterogeneity-Aware Asymmetric Partitioning for LLM Training · HPCA 2026
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.312026
AutoHAAP: Automated Heterogeneity-Aware Asymmetric Partitioning for LLM Training · HPCA 2026
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.312026
AutoHAAP: Automated Heterogeneity-Aware Asymmetric Partitioning for LLM Training · HPCA 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state caching · 1.0memory-aware initialization · 1.0heterogeneity-aware load-balancing estimator · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AutoHAAP: Automated Heterogeneity-Aware Asymmetric Partitioning for LLM Training
abstract
Heterogeneous clusters with diverse devices mitigate computational and memory burdens in large language model (LLM) training, yet their inherent resource heterogeneity, characterized by divergent computation, memory, and bandwidth capabilities, renders manual parallelization strategy optimization both challenging and time-intensive. Automatic parallelization is critical for scaling complex workloads across heterogeneous architectures. However, previous methodologies face significant inefficiencies. First, insufficient pruning of the parameter initialization space results in impractically large search spaces. Second, the prevailing automatic parallel search strategies exhibit suboptimal performance in load balancing and resource constraint adaptation. Third, dynamic parallel strategy tuning incurs substantial overhead due to redundant latency calculations for operators with unchanged configurations, leading to unnecessary computational costs. Therefore, insufficient search space pruning, suboptimal load/resource adaptation, and redundant latency computation are identified as the major bottlenecks in our research. To address these challenges, we propose AutoHAAP (Automated Heterogeneity-Aware Asymmetric Partitioning), a novel framework incorporating three core innovations: (1) memory-aware initialization to drastically reduce viable search spaces; (2) a heterogeneity-aware load-balancing estimator that guides resource-efficient configuration search; and (3) state caching mechanisms eliminating redundant latency calculations. Evaluations across GPT3 and Llama3 models of varying scales on both homogeneous and heterogeneous clusters demonstrate that AutoHAAP achieves$\mathbf{0. 6 8}-\mathbf{9 8} \times$search efficiency gains,$\mathbf{6. 5 7 \%} \boldsymbol{-} \mathbf{1 0 6. 9 \%} \boldsymbol{\times}$throughput improvements in homogeneous environments, and$\mathbf{1 0. 1 \%} \boldsymbol{-} 22.28 \% \times$throughput enhancements in heterogeneous setups. These results validate AutoHAAP's effectiveness in distributed LLM training on diverse hardware.
Nana Tang, Shu Pan, Dingding Yu, Zeyue Wang 0003, Mou Sun, Kejie Fu, Fangyu Wang, Yunchuan Chen
HPCA2
2026 HOC: Hierarchical Overlapped Communication Optimization for Parallelism in Distributed Training
Zeyue Wang 0003, Shu Pan, Nana Tang
ISCAS5
2017 Constrained interval-valued linear regression model
abstract
In current interval-valued linear regression models, meaningless predictions may be generated because the lower bounds of the predicted intervals may be greater than their upper bounds. To avoid this problem, we propose a constrained interval-valued linear regression model based on random set theory. However, due to the introduction of constraints in this model, the expectation of the errors is no longer zero, and estimation provided by traditional least square may produce systematic bias. To address this issue, we introduce a two-step procedure: in the first step, a dummy variable is defined and plugged into the regression model to ensure that the expectation of errors is zero; least square estimation is then used in the second step. To show the validity of proposed method, experiments on simulated and real data are presented.
Shoumei Li, Nana Tang, Thierry Denoeux
FUSION3