Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anne S. Wannenwetsch
dblp:205/3063
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-7016-3820ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 51% Segmentation and scene understanding · 20% 3D vision · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Probabilistic Pixel-Adaptive Refinement Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Image and video processing › image enhancement
image refinement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Probabilistic Pixel-Adaptive Refinement Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.4 | 2 | 2018 | Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient Linearization · CVPR 2018 ProbFlow: Joint Optical Flow and Uncertainty Estimation · ICCV 2017 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.4 | 2 | 2018 | ProbFlow: Joint Optical Flow and Uncertainty Estimation · ICCV 2017 Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient Linearization · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient Linearization · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
stochastic variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient Linearization · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | ProbFlow: Joint Optical Flow and Uncertainty Estimation · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Probabilistic Pixel-Adaptive Refinement Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient Linearization · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient Linearization · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic pixel-adaptive convolution · 0.9encoder-decoder network · 0.9stochastic variational inference · 0.7gradient linearization · 0.7variational inference · 0.6mean field · 0.6energy minimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Probabilistic Pixel-Adaptive Refinement NetworksabstractEncoder-decoder networks have found widespread use in various dense prediction tasks. However, the strong reduction of spatial resolution in the encoder leads to a loss of location information as well as boundary artifacts. To address this, image-adaptive post-processing methods have shown beneficial by leveraging the high-resolution input image(s) as guidance data. We extend such approaches by considering an important orthogonal source of information: the network's confidence in its own predictions. We introduce probabilistic pixel-adaptive convolutions (PPACs), which not only depend on image guidance data for filtering, but also respect the reliability of per-pixel predictions. As such, PPACs allow for image-adaptive smoothing and simultaneously propagating pixels of high confidence into less reliable regions, while respecting object boundaries. We demonstrate their utility in refinement networks for optical flow and semantic segmentation, where PPACs lead to a clear reduction in boundary artifacts. Moreover, our proposed refinement step is able to substantially improve the accuracy on various widely used benchmarks. Anne S. Wannenwetsch, Stefan Roth 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2018 | Stochastic Variational Inference With Gradient LinearizationabstractVariational inference has experienced a recent surge in popularity owing to stochastic approaches, which have yielded practical tools for a wide range of model classes. A key benefit is that stochastic variational inference obviates the tedious process of deriving analytical expressions for closed-form variable updates. Instead, one simply needs to derive the gradient of the log-posterior, which is often much easier. Yet for certain model classes, the log-posterior itself is difficult to optimize using standard gradient techniques. One such example are random field models, where optimization based on gradient linearization has proven popular, since it speeds up convergence significantly and can avoid poor local optima. In this paper we propose stochastic variational inference with gradient linearization (SVIGL). It is similarly convenient as standard stochastic variational inference - all that is required is a local linearization of the energy gradient. Its benefit over stochastic variational inference with conventional gradient methods is a clear improvement in convergence speed, while yielding comparable or even better variational approximations in terms of KL divergence. We demonstrate the benefits of SVIGL in three applications: Optical flow estimation, Poisson-Gaussian denoising, and 3D surface reconstruction. Tobias Plötz, Anne S. Wannenwetsch, Stefan Roth 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2017 | ProbFlow: Joint Optical Flow and Uncertainty EstimationabstractOptical flow estimation remains challenging due to untextured areas, motion boundaries, occlusions, and more. Thus, the estimated flow is not equally reliable across the image. To that end, post-hoc confidence measures have been introduced to assess the per-pixel reliability of the flow. We overcome the artificial separation of optical flow and confidence estimation by introducing a method that jointly predicts optical flow and its underlying uncertainty. Starting from common energy-based formulations, we rely on the corresponding posterior distribution of the flow given the images. We derive a variational inference scheme based on mean field, which incorporates best practices from energy minimization. An uncertainty measure is obtained along the flow at every pixel as the (marginal) entropy of the variational distribution. We demonstrate the flexibility of our probabilistic approach by applying it to two different energies and on two benchmarks. We not only obtain flow results that are competitive with the underlying energy minimization approach, but also a reliable uncertainty measure that significantly outperforms existing post-hoc approaches. Anne S. Wannenwetsch, Margret Keuper, Stefan Roth 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |