Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Constanza Fierro

dblp:205/9159 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8870-0137ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 56% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% Information extraction and text analysis · 19%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › scientific text generation
citation generation
0.812024
Learning to Plan and Generate Text with Citations · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
content planning
0.812024
Learning to Plan and Generate Text with Citations · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.212022
Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP · ACL (1) 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 1.5large language model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning to Plan and Generate Text with Citations
abstract
Constanza Fierro, Reinald Kim Amplayo, Fantine Huot, Nicola De Cao, Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Mirella Lapata. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Constanza Fierro, Reinald Kim Amplayo, Fantine Huot, Nicola De Cao, Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Mirella Lapata
ACL (1)1
2024 μPLAN: Summarizing using a Content Plan as Cross-Lingual Bridge
abstract
Fantine Huot, Joshua Maynez, Chris Alberti, Reinald Kim Amplayo, Priyanka Agrawal, Constanza Fierro, Shashi Narayan, Mirella Lapata. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Fantine Huot, Joshua Maynez, Christopher Alberti, Reinald Kim Amplayo, Priyanka Agrawal, Constanza Fierro, Shashi Narayan, Mirella Lapata
EACL (1)6
2024 Defining Knowledge: Bridging Epistemology and Large Language Models
abstract
Knowledge claims are abundant in the literature on large language models (LLMs); but can we say that GPT-4 truly "knows" the Earth is round?To address this question, we review standard definitions of knowledge in epistemology and we formalize interpretations applicable to LLMs.In doing so, we identify inconsistencies and gaps in how current NLP research conceptualizes knowledge with respect to epistemological frameworks.Additionally, we conduct a survey of 100 professional philosophers and computer scientists to compare their preferences in knowledge definitions and their views on whether LLMs can really be said to know.Finally, we suggest evaluation protocols for testing knowledge in accordance to the most relevant definitions.
Constanza Fierro, Ruchira Dhar, Filippos Stamatiou, Nicolas Garneau, Anders Søgaard
EMNLP1
2024 Do Vision and Language Models Share Concepts? A Vector Space Alignment Study
abstract
Abstract Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) are said to “lack the ability to connect utterances to the world” (Bender and Koller, 2020), because they do not have “mental models of the world” (Mitchell and Krakauer, 2023). If so, one would expect LM representations to be unrelated to representations induced by vision models. We present an empirical evaluation across four families of LMs (BERT, GPT-2, OPT, and LLaMA-2) and three vision model architectures (ResNet, SegFormer, and MAE). Our experiments show that LMs partially converge towards representations isomorphic to those of vision models, subject to dispersion, polysemy, and frequency. This has important implications for both multi-modal processing and the LM understanding debate (Mitchell and Krakauer, 2023).1
Jiaang Li 0002, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Constanza Fierro, Anders Søgaard
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics3
2022 Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP
abstract
Daniel Hershcovich, Stella Frank, Heather Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux, Mostafa Abdou, Stephanie Brandl, Emanuele Bugliarello, Laura Cabello Piqueras, Ilias Chalkidis, Ruixiang Cui, Constanza Fierro, Katerina Margatina, Phillip Rust, Anders Søgaard. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022.
Daniel Hershcovich, Stella Frank, Heather C. Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux, Mostafa Abdou, Stephanie Brandl, Emanuele Bugliarello, Laura Cabello Piqueras, Ilias Chalkidis, Ruixiang Cui, Constanza Fierro, Aikaterini Margatina, Phillip Rust, Anders Søgaard
ACL (1)11
2022 Date Recognition in Historical Parish Records
Laura Cabello Piqueras, Constanza Fierro, Jonas F. Lotz, Phillip Rust, Joen Rommedahl, Jeppe Klok Due, Christian Igel, Desmond Elliott, Carsten B. Pedersen, Israfel Salazar, Anders Søgaard
ICFHR2