Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johnny Wei

dblp:205/9408 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › parser adaptation
cross-domain parsing
0.312018
Twitter Universal Dependency Parsing for African-American and Mainstream American English · ACL (1) 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.312018
Twitter Universal Dependency Parsing for African-American and Mainstream American English · ACL (1) 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.312018
Twitter Universal Dependency Parsing for African-American and Mainstream American English · ACL (1) 2018
Computational social science and digital humanities
social media analysis
0.112018
Twitter Universal Dependency Parsing for African-American and Mainstream American English · ACL (1) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

universal dependencies · 0.7data synthesis · 0.7cross-domain adaptation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Twitter Universal Dependency Parsing for African-American and Mainstream American English
abstract
Due to the presence of both Twitterspecific conventions and non-standard and dialectal language, Twitter presents a significant parsing challenge to current dependency parsing tools.We broaden English dependency parsing to handle social media English, particularly social media African-American English (AAE), by developing and annotating a new dataset of 500 tweets, 250 of which are in AAE, within the Universal Dependencies 2.0 framework.We describe our standards for handling Twitter-and AAE-specific features and evaluate a variety of crossdomain strategies for improving parsing with no, or very little, in-domain labeled data, including a new data synthesis approach.We analyze these methods' impact on performance disparities between AAE and Mainstream American English tweets, and assess parsing accuracy for specific AAE lexical and syntactic features.Our
Su Lin Blodgett, Johnny Wei, Brendan T. O'Connor 0001
ACL (1)2