Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elad Ben-Yehuda

dblp:207/1859 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 50% Authentication and access control · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › access control
least privilege
0.312017
WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy? · SOSP 2017
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.312017
WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy? · SOSP 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing › workload isolation
container isolation
0.112017
WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy? · SOSP 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

resource prediction · 0.6container isolation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 WatchIT: Who Watches Your IT Guy?
abstract
System administrators have unlimited access to system resources. As the Snowden case highlighted, these permissions can be exploited to steal valuable personal, classified, or commercial data. This problem is exacerbated when a third party administers the system. For example, a bank outsourcing its IT would not want to allow administrators access to the actual data. We propose WatchIT: a strategy that constrains IT personnel's view of the system and monitors their actions. To this end, we introduce the abstraction of perforated containers -- while regular Linux containers are too restrictive to be used by system administrators, by "punching holes" in them, we strike a balance between information security and required administrative needs. Following the principle of least privilege, our system predicts which system resources should be accessible for handling each IT issue, creates a perforated container with the corresponding isolation, and deploys it as needed for fixing the problem.
Noam Shalev, Idit Keidar, Yaron Weinsberg, Yosef Moatti, Elad Ben-Yehuda
SOSP5