Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

HyungSeok Han

dblp:207/6588 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 9 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
8 papers
Systems and software security · 78% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 14% Usable security · 4%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
5 papers
Program analysis · 65% Software testing · 16% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 10%
Computer networks
1 paper
Cellular and mobile networks · 56% Software-defined and programmable networks · 44%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
1.962023
HyperFuzzer: An Efficient Hybrid Fuzzer for Virtual CPUs · CCS 2021
Montage: A Neural Network Language Model-Guided JavaScript Engine Fuzzer · USENIX Security Symposium 2020
CodeAlchemist: Semantics-Aware Code Generation to Find Vulnerabilities in JavaScript Engines · NDSS 2019
Program analysis › static analysis
bug detection
1.222023
QueryX: Symbolic Query on Decompiled Code for Finding Bugs in COTS Binaries · SP 2023
Precise and Scalable Detection of Use-after-Compacting-Garbage-Collection Bugs · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing
1.132021
HyperFuzzer: An Efficient Hybrid Fuzzer for Virtual CPUs · CCS 2021
Montage: A Neural Network Language Model-Guided JavaScript Engine Fuzzer · USENIX Security Symposium 2020
The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2021
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.822021
Precise and Scalable Detection of Use-after-Compacting-Garbage-Collection Bugs · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
IMF: Inferred Model-based Fuzzer · CCS 2017
Software testing
fuzzing
0.822021
The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2021
IMF: Inferred Model-based Fuzzer · CCS 2017
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › decentralized finance
decentralized finance security
0.812024
I Experienced More than 10 DeFi Scams: On DeFi Users' Perception of Security Breaches and Countermeasures · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Program analysis
static analysis
0.712023
QueryX: Symbolic Query on Decompiled Code for Finding Bugs in COTS Binaries · SP 2023
Program analysis
symbolic execution
0.712023
QueryX: Symbolic Query on Decompiled Code for Finding Bugs in COTS Binaries · SP 2023
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery › fuzzing
hypervisor fuzzing
0.512021
HyperFuzzer: An Efficient Hybrid Fuzzer for Virtual CPUs · CCS 2021
Runtime systems and virtual machines
garbage collection
0.512021
Precise and Scalable Detection of Use-after-Compacting-Garbage-Collection Bugs · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Systems and software security
javascript engine
0.412019
CodeAlchemist: Semantics-Aware Code Generation to Find Vulnerabilities in JavaScript Engines · NDSS 2019
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery › fuzzing
kernel fuzzing
0.312017
IMF: Inferred Model-based Fuzzer · CCS 2017
Software-defined and programmable networks
security analysis
0.212015
Breaking and Fixing VoLTE: Exploiting Hidden Data Channels and Mis-implementations · CCS 2015
Cellular and mobile networks › LTE
VoLTE
0.212015
Breaking and Fixing VoLTE: Exploiting Hidden Data Channels and Mis-implementations · CCS 2015
Network security › wireless network security › mobile network security
cellular network attack
0.212015
Breaking and Fixing VoLTE: Exploiting Hidden Data Channels and Mis-implementations · CCS 2015
Cellular and mobile networks
LTE
0.112015
Breaking and Fixing VoLTE: Exploiting Hidden Data Channels and Mis-implementations · CCS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

intermediate representation · 1.3decompilation · 1.3control-flow graph reduction · 1.3taxonomy · 1.0survey · 1.0API dependence model · 0.6hybrid fuzzing · 0.5dynamic symbolic execution · 0.5neural network language model · 0.4fuzzing · 0.4inferred model-based fuzzing · 0.3systematic security analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Ruby: Unmasking Unsafe Rust in Stripped Binaries via Machine Learning
Sangdon Park 0001, HyungSeok Han, Xiaokuan Zhang, Taesoo Kim
DSN3
2024 I Experienced More than 10 DeFi Scams: On DeFi Users' Perception of Security Breaches and Countermeasures
Jun-Ho Huh, HyungSeok Han, Jaehyuk Lee, Jihae Ahn, Frank Li 0001, Hyoungshick Kim, Taesoo Kim
USENIX Security Symposium3
2023 QueryX: Symbolic Query on Decompiled Code for Finding Bugs in COTS Binaries
abstract
Extensible static checking tools, such as Sys and CodeQL, have successfully discovered bugs in source code. These tools allow analysts to write application-specific rules, referred to as queries. These queries can leverage the domain knowledge of analysts, thereby making the analysis more accurate and scalable. However, the majority of these tools are inapplicable to binary-only analysis. One exception, joern, translates a binary code into decompiled code and feeds the decompiled code into an ordinary C code analyzer. However, this approach is not sufficiently precise for symbolic analysis, as it overlooks the unique characteristics of decompiled code. While binary analysis platforms, such as angr, support symbolic analysis, analysts must understand their intermediate representations (IRs) although they are mostly working with decompiled code.In this paper, we propose a precise and scalable symbolic analysis called fearless symbolic analysis that uses intuitive queries for binary code and implement this in QueryX. To make the query intuitive, QueryX enables analysts to write queries on top of decompiled code instead of IRs. In particular, QueryX supports callbacks on decompiled code, using which analysts can control symbolic analysis to discover bugs in the code. For precise analysis, we lift decompiled code into our IR named DNR and perform symbolic analysis on DNR while considering the characteristics of the decompiled code. Notably, DNR is only used internally such that it allows analysts to write queries regardless of using DNR. For scalability, QueryX automatically reduces control-flow graphs using callbacks and ordering dependencies between callbacks that are specified in the queries. We applied QueryX to the Windows kernel, the Windows system service, and an automotive binary. As a result, we found 15 unique bugs including 10 CVEs and earned $180,000 from the Microsoft bug bounty program.
HyungSeok Han, JeongOh Kyea, Yonghwi Jin, Jinoh Kang, Brian Pak, Insu Yun
SP1
2021 HyperFuzzer: An Efficient Hybrid Fuzzer for Virtual CPUs
abstract
In this cloud computing era, the security of hypervisors is critical to the overall security of the cloud. In particular, the security of CPU virtualization in hypervisors is paramount because it is implemented in the most privileged CPU mode. Blackbox and graybox fuzzing are limited to finding shallow virtual CPU bugs due to its huge search space. Whitebox fuzzing can be used for systematic analysis of CPU virtualization, but existing implementations rely on slow hardware emulators to enable dynamic symbolic execution.
Xinyang Ge, Ben Niu 0007, Robert Brotzman, Yaohui Chen 0001, HyungSeok Han, Patrice Godefroid, Weidong Cui
CCS5
2021 Precise and Scalable Detection of Use-after-Compacting-Garbage-Collection Bugs
HyungSeok Han, Andrew Wesie, Brian Pak
USENIX Security Symposium1
2021 The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Survey
abstract
Among the many software testing techniques available today,fuzzinghas remained highly popular due to its conceptual simplicity, its low barrier to deployment, and its vast amount of empirical evidence in discovering real-world software vulnerabilities. At a high level, fuzzing refers to a process of repeatedly running a program with generated inputs that may be syntactically or semantically malformed. While researchers and practitioners alike have invested a large and diverse effort towards improving fuzzing in recent years, this surge of work has also made it difficult to gain a comprehensive and coherent view of fuzzing. To help preserve and bring coherence to the vast literature of fuzzing, this paper presents a unified, general-purpose model of fuzzing together with a taxonomy of the current fuzzing literature. We methodically explore the design decisions at every stage of our model fuzzer by surveying the related literature and innovations in the art, science, and engineering that make modern-day fuzzers effective.
Valentin J. M. Manès, HyungSeok Han, Choongwoo Han, Sang Kil Cha, Manuel Egele, Edward J. Schwartz, Maverick Woo
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
2020 Montage: A Neural Network Language Model-Guided JavaScript Engine Fuzzer
Suyoung Lee, HyungSeok Han, Sang Kil Cha, Sooel Son
USENIX Security Symposium2
2019 CodeAlchemist: Semantics-Aware Code Generation to Find Vulnerabilities in JavaScript Engines
HyungSeok Han, DongHyeon Oh, Sang Kil Cha
NDSS1
2017 IMF: Inferred Model-based Fuzzer
abstract
Kernel vulnerabilities are critical in security because they naturally allow attackers to gain unprivileged root access. Although there has been much research on finding kernel vulnerabilities from source code, there are relatively few research on kernel fuzzing, which is a practical bug finding technique that does not require any source code. Existing kernel fuzzing techniques involve feeding in random input values to kernel API functions. However, such a simple approach does not reveal latent bugs deep in the kernel code, because many API functions are dependent on each other, and they can quickly reject arbitrary parameter values based on their calling context. In this paper, we propose a novel fuzzing technique for commodity OS kernels that leverages inferred dependence model between API function calls to discover deep kernel bugs. We implement our technique on a fuzzing system, called IMF. IMF has already found 32 previously unknown kernel vulnerabilities on the latest macOS version 10.12.3 (16D32) at the time of this writing.
HyungSeok Han, Sang Kil Cha
CCS1
2015 Breaking and Fixing VoLTE: Exploiting Hidden Data Channels and Mis-implementations
abstract
Long Term Evolution (LTE) is becoming the dominant cellular networking technology, shifting the cellular network away from its circuit-switched legacy towards a packet-switched network that resembles the Internet. To support voice calls over the LTE network, operators have introduced Voice-over-LTE (VoLTE), which dramatically changes how voice calls are handled, both from user equipment and infrastructure perspectives. We find that this dramatic shift opens up a number of new attack surfaces that have not been previously explored. To call attention to this matter, this paper presents a systematic security analysis.
Dongkwan Kim 0001, Minhee Kwon, HyungSeok Han, Yeongjin Jang, Dongsu Han, Taesoo Kim, Yongdae Kim
CCS4