Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frederik Ebert

dblp:207/7509 · also Frederik D. Ebert · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Robot manipulation · 28% Reinforcement learning · 22% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 15%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.922021
Model-Based Visual Planning with Self-Supervised Functional Distances · ICLR 2021
Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictors · NeurIPS 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
visual planning
0.922021
Model-Based Visual Planning with Self-Supervised Functional Distances · ICLR 2021
Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictors · NeurIPS 2020
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual navigation
0.512021
Model-Based Visual Planning with Self-Supervised Functional Distances · ICLR 2021
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation
0.412020
OmniTact: A Multi-Directional High-Resolution Touch Sensor · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.412020
Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictors · NeurIPS 2020
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing
0.412020
OmniTact: A Multi-Directional High-Resolution Touch Sensor · ICRA 2020
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video prediction
visual prediction
0.412020
Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictors · NeurIPS 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model-based control
0.412019
Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.412019
Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation › dexterous manipulation
tactile manipulation
0.412019
Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › tactile feedback control
tactile servoing
0.412019
Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video prediction
0.412019
Time-Agnostic Prediction: Predicting Predictable Video Frames · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation
nonprehensile manipulation
0.112019
Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models · ICRA 2019
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video analysis
0.112019
Time-Agnostic Prediction: Predicting Predictable Video Frames · ICLR (Poster) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

predictability estimation · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.5functional distances · 0.5goal-conditioned predictors · 0.4divide-and-conquer planning · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4computer vision · 0.4model predictive control · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4deep dynamics model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Model-Based Visual Planning with Self-Supervised Functional Distances
Stephen Tian, Suraj Nair 0003, Frederik Ebert, Sudeep Dasari, Benjamin Eysenbach, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine
ICLR3
2020 OmniTact: A Multi-Directional High-Resolution Touch Sensor
abstract
Incorporating touch as a sensing modality for robots can enable finer and more robust manipulation skills. Existing tactile sensors are either flat, have small sensitive fields or only provide low-resolution signals. In this paper, we introduce OmniTact, a multi-directional high-resolution tactile sensor. OmniTact is designed to be used as a fingertip for robotic manipulation with robotic hands, and uses multiple micro-cameras to detect multi-directional deformations of a gel-based skin. This provides a rich signal from which a variety of different contact state variables can be inferred using modern image processing and computer vision methods. We evaluate the capabilities of OmniTact on a challenging robotic control task that requires inserting an electrical connector into an outlet, as well as a state estimation problem that is representative of those typically encountered in dexterous robotic manipulation, where the goal is to infer the angle of contact of a curved finger pressing against an object. Both tasks are performed using only touch sensing and deep convolutional neural networks to process images from the sensor's cameras. We compare with a state-of-the-art tactile sensor that is only sensitive on one side, as well as a state-of-the-art multi-directional tactile sensor, and find that OmniTact's combination of high-resolution and multi-directional sensing is crucial for reliably inserting the electrical connector and allows for higher accuracy in the state estimation task. Videos and supplementary material can be found here4.
Akhil Padmanabha, Frederik Ebert, Stephen Tian, Roberto Calandra, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine
ICRA2
2020 Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictors
abstract
The ability to predict and plan into the future is fundamental for agents acting in the world. To reach a faraway goal, we predict trajectories at multiple timescales, first devising a coarse plan towards the goal and then gradually filling in details. In contrast, current learning approaches for visual prediction and planning fail on long-horizon tasks as they generate predictions (1)~without considering goal information, and (2)~at the finest temporal resolution, one step at a time. In this work we propose a framework for visual prediction and planning that is able to overcome both of these limitations. First, we formulate the problem of predicting towards a goal and propose the corresponding class of latent space goal-conditioned predictors (GCPs). GCPs significantly improve planning efficiency by constraining the search space to only those trajectories that reach the goal. Further, we show how GCPs can be naturally formulated as hierarchical models that, given two observations, predict an observation between them, and by recursively subdividing each part of the trajectory generate complete sequences. This divide-and-conquer strategy is effective at long-term prediction, and enables us to design an effective hierarchical planning algorithm that optimizes trajectories in a coarse-to-fine manner. We show that by using both goal-conditioning and hierarchical prediction, GCPs enable us to solve visual planning tasks with much longer horizon than previously possible. See prediction and planning videos on the supplementary website: sites.google.com/view/video-gcp.
Karl Pertsch, Oleh Rybkin, Frederik Ebert, Shenghao Zhou, Dinesh Jayaraman, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine
NeurIPS3
2019 Time-Agnostic Prediction: Predicting Predictable Video Frames
Dinesh Jayaraman, Frederik Ebert, Alexei A. Efros, Sergey Levine
ICLR (Poster)2
2019 Manipulation by Feel: Touch-Based Control with Deep Predictive Models
abstract
Touch sensing is widely acknowledged to be important for dexterous robotic manipulation, but exploiting tactile sensing for continuous, non-prehensile manipulation is challenging. General purpose control techniques that are able to effectively leverage tactile sensing as well as accurate physics models of contacts and forces remain largely elusive, and it is unclear how to even specify a desired behavior in terms of tactile percepts. In this paper, we take a step towards addressing these issues by combining high-resolution tactile sensing with data-driven modeling using deep neural network dynamics models. We propose deep tactile MPC, a framework for learning to perform tactile servoing from raw tactile sensor inputs, without manual supervision. We show that this method enables a robot equipped with a GelSight-style tactile sensor to manipulate a ball, analog stick, and 20-sided die, learning from unsupervised autonomous interaction and then using the learned tactile predictive model to reposition each object to user-specified configurations, indicated by a goal tactile reading. Videos, visualizations and the code are available here: https://sites.google.com/view/deeptactilempc.
Stephen Tian, Frederik Ebert, Dinesh Jayaraman, Mayur Mudigonda, Chelsea Finn, Roberto Calandra, Sergey Levine
ICRA2