Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Katerina Clemens

dblp:209/4939 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% 3D vision · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.312017
Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
feature embedding
0.312017
Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.312017
Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision
mid-level vision
0.112017
Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep convolutional neural network · 0.6adaptive stimulus selection · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses
abstract
Adaptive stimulus selection methods in neuroscience have primarily focused on maximizing the firing rate of a single recorded neuron. When recording from a population of neurons, it is usually not possible to find a single stimulus that maximizes the firing rates of all neurons. This motivates optimizing an objective function that takes into account the responses of all recorded neurons together. We propose “Adept,” an adaptive stimulus selection method that can optimize population objective functions. In simulations, we first confirmed that population objective functions elicited more diverse stimulus responses than single-neuron objective functions. Then, we tested Adept in a closed-loop electrophysiological experiment in which population activity was recorded from macaque V4, a cortical area known for mid-level visual processing. To predict neural responses, we used the outputs of a deep convolutional neural network model as feature embeddings. Images chosen by Adept elicited mean neural responses that were 20% larger than those for randomly-chosen natural images, and also evoked a larger diversity of neural responses. Such adaptive stimulus selection methods can facilitate experiments that involve neurons far from the sensory periphery, for which it is often unclear which stimuli to present.
Benjamin Cowley 0002, Ryan C. Williamson, Katerina Clemens, Matthew A. Smith 0001, Byron M. Yu
NIPS3