Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Katerina Clemens
dblp:209/4939
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% 3D vision · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
feature embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
mid-level vision |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responses · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep convolutional neural network · 0.6adaptive stimulus selection · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Adaptive stimulus selection for optimizing neural population responsesabstractAdaptive stimulus selection methods in neuroscience have primarily focused on maximizing the firing rate of a single recorded neuron. When recording from a population of neurons, it is usually not possible to find a single stimulus that maximizes the firing rates of all neurons. This motivates optimizing an objective function that takes into account the responses of all recorded neurons together. We propose “Adept,” an adaptive stimulus selection method that can optimize population objective functions. In simulations, we first confirmed that population objective functions elicited more diverse stimulus responses than single-neuron objective functions. Then, we tested Adept in a closed-loop electrophysiological experiment in which population activity was recorded from macaque V4, a cortical area known for mid-level visual processing. To predict neural responses, we used the outputs of a deep convolutional neural network model as feature embeddings. Images chosen by Adept elicited mean neural responses that were 20% larger than those for randomly-chosen natural images, and also evoked a larger diversity of neural responses. Such adaptive stimulus selection methods can facilitate experiments that involve neurons far from the sensory periphery, for which it is often unclear which stimuli to present. Benjamin Cowley 0002, Ryan C. Williamson, Katerina Clemens, Matthew A. Smith 0001, Byron M. Yu |
NIPS | 3 |