Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nick Foti
dblp:209/4966
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Optimization for machine learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
control variates |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reducing Reparameterization Gradient Variance · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
reparameterization gradient |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reducing Reparameterization Gradient Variance · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reducing Reparameterization Gradient Variance · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Reducing Reparameterization Gradient Variance · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo estimation · 0.3control variates · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Reducing Reparameterization Gradient VarianceabstractOptimization with noisy gradients has become ubiquitous in statistics and machine learning. Reparameterization gradients, or gradient estimates computed via the ``reparameterization trick,'' represent a class of noisy gradients often used in Monte Carlo variational inference (MCVI). However, when these gradient estimators are too noisy, the optimization procedure can be slow or fail to converge. One way to reduce noise is to generate more samples for the gradient estimate, but this can be computationally expensive. Instead, we view the noisy gradient as a random variable, and form an inexpensive approximation of the generating procedure for the gradient sample. This approximation has high correlation with the noisy gradient by construction, making it a useful control variate for variance reduction. We demonstrate our approach on a non-conjugate hierarchical model and a Bayesian neural net where our method attained orders of magnitude (20-2{,}000$\times$) reduction in gradient variance resulting in faster and more stable optimization. Andrew C. Miller, Nick Foti, Alexander D'Amour, Ryan P. Adams |
NIPS | 2 |