Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Debanjana Kar

dblp:209/7105 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-2878-5433ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Software maintenance and evolution · 44% Debugging and program repair · 19% Software testing · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 61% Language models and text generation · 21% Trustworthy machine learning · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
log analysis
1.012026
Scalable and Efficient Large-Scale Log Analysis with LLMs: An IT Software Support Case Study · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
agent evaluation
0.912025
ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Tasks · ICML 2025
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair
0.912025
ScriptSmith: A Unified LLM Framework for Enhancing IT Operations via Automated Bash Script Generation, Assessment, and Refinement · AAAI 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.912025
ScriptSmith: A Unified LLM Framework for Enhancing IT Operations via Automated Bash Script Generation, Assessment, and Refinement · AAAI 2025
Software maintenance and evolution › devops
site reliability engineering
0.912025
ScriptSmith: A Unified LLM Framework for Enhancing IT Operations via Automated Bash Script Generation, Assessment, and Refinement · AAAI 2025
Software testing › test repair
test script repair
0.912025
ScriptSmith: A Unified LLM Framework for Enhancing IT Operations via Automated Bash Script Generation, Assessment, and Refinement · AAAI 2025
Information retrieval › document retrieval
metadata-based retrieval
0.612022
Metadata-based retrieval for resolution recommendation in AIOps · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.612022
Metadata-based retrieval for resolution recommendation in AIOps · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022
Information retrieval
search engines
0.612022
Metadata-based retrieval for resolution recommendation in AIOps · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312026
Scalable and Efficient Large-Scale Log Analysis with LLMs: An IT Software Support Case Study · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI safety
0.312025
ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Tasks · ICML 2025
Software maintenance and evolution
AIOps
0.212022
Metadata-based retrieval for resolution recommendation in AIOps · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 2.0LLM inference on CPU · 2.0benchmarking · 1.7metadata prediction · 1.1log anomaly detection · 1.1large language model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Scalable and Efficient Large-Scale Log Analysis with LLMs: An IT Software Support Case Study
abstract
IT environments typically have logging mechanisms to monitor system health and detect issues. However, the huge volume of generated logs makes manual inspection impractical, highlighting the importance of automated log analysis in IT Software Support. In this paper, we propose a log analytics tool that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for log data processing and issue diagnosis, enabling the generation of automated insights and summaries. We further present a novel approach for efficiently running LLMs on CPUs to process massive log volumes in minimal time without compromising output quality. We share the insights and lessons learned from deployment of the tool - in production since March 2024 - scaled across 70 software products, processing over 2000 tickets for issue diagnosis, achieving a time savings of 300+ man hours and an estimated $15,444 per month in manpower costs compared to the traditional practices.
Pranjal Gupta, Karan Bhukar, Seema Nagar, Prateeti Mohapatra, Debanjana Kar
AAAI6
2025 ScriptSmith: A Unified LLM Framework for Enhancing IT Operations via Automated Bash Script Generation, Assessment, and Refinement
abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of site reliability engineering (SRE), the demand for efficient and effective solutions to manage and resolve issues in site and cloud applications is paramount. This paper presents an innovative approach to action automation using large language models (LLMs) for script generation, assessment, and refinement. By leveraging the capabilities of LLMs, we aim to significantly reduce the human effort involved in writing and debugging scripts, thereby enhancing the productivity of SRE teams. Our experiments focus on Bash scripts, a commonly used tool in SRE, and involve the CodeSift dataset of 100 tasks and the InterCode dataset of 153 tasks. The results show that LLMs can automatically assess and refine scripts efficiently, reducing the need for script validation in an execution environment. Results demonstrate that the framework shows an overall improvement of 7-10% in script generation.
Pooja Aggarwal, Oishik Chatterjee, Suranjana Samanta, Prateeti Mohapatra, Debanjana Kar, Ruchi Mahindru, Steve Barbieri, Eugen Postea, Brad Blancett, Arthur De Magalhaes
AAAI6
2025 ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Tasks
abstract
Realizing the vision of using AI agents to automate critical IT tasks depends on the ability to measure and understand effectiveness of proposed solutions. We introduce ITBench, a framework that offers a systematic methodology for benchmarking AI agents to address real-world IT automation tasks. Our initial release targets three key areas: Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), Compliance and Security Operations (CISO), and Financial Operations (FinOps). The design enables AI researchers to understand the challenges and opportunities of AI agents for IT automation with push-button workflows and interpretable metrics. IT-Bench includes an initial set of 102 real-world scenarios, which can be easily extended by community contributions. Our results show that agents powered by state-of-the-art models resolve only 11.4% of SRE scenarios, 25.2% of CISO scenarios, and 25.8% of FinOps scenarios (excluding anomaly detection). For FinOps-specific anomaly detection (AD) scenarios, AI agents achieve an F1 score of 0.35. We expect ITBench to be a key enabler of AI-driven IT automation that is correct, safe, and fast. IT-Bench, along with a leaderboard and sample agent implementations, is available at https://github.com/ibm/itbench.
Saurabh Jha, Rohan R. Arora, Yuji Watanabe, Takumi Yanagawa, Yinfang Chen, Jackson Clark, Bhavya, Mudit Verma, Hirokuni Kitahara, Noah Zheutlin, Saki Takano, Divya Pathak, Felix George, Xinbo Wu, Bekir O. Turkkan, Gerard Vanloo, Michael Nidd, Oishik Chatterjee, Pranjal Gupta, Suranjana Samanta, Pooja Aggarwal, Rong Lee, Jae-wook Ahn, Debanjana Kar, Amit M. Paradkar, Yu Deng 0004, Pratibha Moogi, Prateeti Mohapatra, Naoki Abe, Chandrasekhar Narayanaswami 0001, Tianyin Xu, Lav R. Varshney, Ruchi Mahindru, Anca Sailer, Larisa Shwartz, Daby M. Sow, Nicholas C. Fuller, Ruchir Puri
ICML26
2024 Decoding Logs for Automatic Metric Identification
abstract
Automated Log Analysis tasks such as root cause analysis and fault prediction play a pivotal role in maintaining the overall application health. These tasks employ log parsers to extract the dynamic (variable) and constant (template) parts of a log line to generate a template. However, our observations indicate that not all templates carry equal significance. Hence, there is a need to prioritize which templates/variables to use for log analysis. In this paper, we introduce LogMId, a Logs-based Metric Identification method, which is designed to extract critical IT metrics from logs. Through LogMId, we aim to en-hance monitoring, observability tools and in turn Site Reliability Engineers to mine better insights from log data. We showcase the effectiveness of LogMId on a popular log analysis task of anomaly detection. Our experiments indicate that integrating previously used benchmark tools with LogMId features lead to improved results. Additionally, LogMId demonstrates effectiveness even with a smaller amount of training data, emphasising its utility.
Pranjal Gupta, Prateeti Mohapatra, Debanjana Kar, Seema Nagar, Jae-wook Ahn, Amit M. Paradkar, Mudhakar Srivatsa
CLOUD3
2023 Learning Representations on Logs for AIOps
abstract
AI for IT Operations (AIOps) is a powerful platform that Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) use to automate and streamline operational workflows with minimal human intervention. Automated log analysis is a critical task in AIOps as it provides key insights for SREs to identify and address ongoing faults. Tasks such as log format detection, log classification, and log parsing are key components of automated log analysis. Most of these tasks require supervised learning; however, there are multiple challenges due to limited labeled log data and the diverse nature of log data. Large Language Models (LLMs) such as BERT and GPT3 are trained using self-supervision on a vast amount of unlabeled data. These models provide generalized representations that can be effectively used for various downstream tasks with limited labeled data. Motivated by the success of LLMs in specific domains like science and biology, this paper introduces a LLM for log data which is trained on public and proprietary log data. Results of our experiments demonstrate that the proposed LLM outperforms existing models on multiple downstream tasks. In summary, AIOps powered by LLMs offers an efficient and effective solution for automating log analysis tasks and enabling SREs to focus on higher-level tasks. Our proposed LLM, trained on public and proprietary log data, offers superior performance on multiple downstream tasks, making it a valuable addition to the AIOps platform.
Pranjal Gupta, Debanjana Kar, Karan Bhukar, Pooja Aggarwal, Prateeti Mohapatra
CLOUD3
2022 Building Golden Signal Based Signatures for Log Anomaly Detection
abstract
As an increasing number of organizations migrate to the cloud, the main challenge before an operations team is how to effectively use an overwhelming amount of information derivable from multiple data sources like logs, metrics, and traces to help maintain the robustness and availability of cloud services. Site Reliability Engineers (SRE) depend on periodic log data to understand the state of an application and to diagnose the potential root cause of a problem. Despite best practices, service outages happen and result in the loss of billions of dollars in revenue. Many a times, indicators of these outages are buried in the flood of alerts which an SRE receives. Therefore, it is important to reduce noisy alerts so that an SRE can focus on what is critical. Log Anomaly Detection detects anomalous system behaviours and finds patterns (anomalies) in data that do not conform to expected behaviour. Different anomaly detection techniques have been incorporated into various AIOps platforms, but they all suffer from a large number of false positives. Also, some anomalies are transient and resolve on their own. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised model-agnostic persistent anomaly detector based on golden signal based signatures, as a post-processing filtering step on detected anomalies, so we don’t have to interfere with the existing deployed anomaly detector in a system.
Seema Nagar, Suranjana Samanta, Prateeti Mohapatra, Debanjana Kar
CLOUD4
2022 Metadata-based retrieval for resolution recommendation in AIOps
abstract
For a cloud service provider, the goal is to proactively identify signals that can help reduce outages and/or reduce the mean-time-to-detect and mean-time-to-resolve. After an incident is reported, the Site Reliability Engineers diagnose the fault and search for a resolution by formulating a textual query to find similar historical incidents - this approach is called text-based retrieval. However, it has been observed that the formulated queries are inadequate and short. An alternate approach, presented in this paper, integrates information spread across heterogeneous and siloed datasets, as a ready-to-use knowledge base for metadata-based resolution retrieval. Additionally, it exploits historical problem context for building metadata prediction models which are used at run-time for automatically formulating queries from log anomalies detected by the Log Anomaly Detection module. The query, thus formed, is run against the metadata-based index, unlike the text-based index in text retrieval, resulting in superior performance, in terms of relevancy of the resolution documents retrieved. Through experiments on web application server applications deployed on the cloud, we show the efficacy of metadata-based retrieval, which not only returns targeted results as compared to text-based retrieval but also the relevant resolution document appear amongst the top 3 positions for 60% of the queries.
Ruchi Mahindru, Debanjana Kar
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE3
2021 Meta-context Transformers for Domain-Specific Response Generation
Debanjana Kar, Suranjana Samanta, Amar Prakash Azad
PAKDD (3)1