Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florian Kainz

dblp:209/8674 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Image and video processing · 73% Computational photography and imaging · 26% Virtual and augmented reality · 2%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration
image deblurring
0.912025
Learning Lens Blur Fields · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration › image deblurring
non-blind deconvolution
0.912025
Learning Lens Blur Fields · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration
image inpainting
0.712023
Automatic High Resolution Wire Segmentation and Removal · CVPR 2023
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.712023
Automatic High Resolution Wire Segmentation and Removal · CVPR 2023
Computational photography and imaging
high dynamic range imaging
0.622019
Multi-View Image Fusion · ICCV 2019
Burst photography for high dynamic range and low-light imaging on mobile cameras · ACM Trans. Graph. 2016
Image and video processing
image warping
0.412019
Multi-View Image Fusion · ICCV 2019
Image and video processing › image fusion
multi-image fusion
0.412019
Multi-View Image Fusion · ICCV 2019
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.412019
Multi-View Image Fusion · ICCV 2019
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › camera noise removal
burst denoising
0.212016
Burst photography for high dynamic range and low-light imaging on mobile cameras · ACM Trans. Graph. 2016
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition
burst photography
0.212016
Burst photography for high dynamic range and low-light imaging on mobile cameras · ACM Trans. Graph. 2016
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
0.212016
Burst photography for high dynamic range and low-light imaging on mobile cameras · ACM Trans. Graph. 2016
Image and video processing
image registration
0.112016
Burst photography for high dynamic range and low-light imaging on mobile cameras · ACM Trans. Graph. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural representation · 0.9multilayer perceptron · 0.9two-stage segmentation · 0.7tile-based inpainting · 0.7end-to-end learned fusion · 0.4cascaded feature extraction · 0.4wiener filter · 0.2halide · 0.2bayer raw processing · 0.2FFT-based alignment · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Lens Blur Fields
abstract
Optical blur is an inherent property of any lens system and is challenging to model in modern cameras because of their complex optical elements. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a high-dimensional neural representation of blur-the lens blur field-and a practical method for acquiring it. The lens blur field is a multilayer perceptron (MLP) designed to (1) accurately capture variations of the lens 2D point spread function over image plane location, focus setting and, optionally, depth and (2) represent these variations parametrically as a single, sensor-specific function. The representation models the combined effects of defocus, diffraction, aberration, and accounts for sensor features such as pixel color filters and pixel-specific micro-lenses. To learn the real-world blur field of a given device, we formulate a generalized non-blind deconvolution problem that directly optimizes the MLP weights using a small set of focal stacks as the only input. We also provide a first-of-its-kind dataset of 5D blur fields-for smartphone cameras, camera bodies equipped with a variety of lenses, etc. Lastly, we show that acquired 5D blur fields are expressive and accurate enough to reveal, for the first time, differences in optical behavior of smartphone devices of the same make and model.
Esther Y. H. Lin, Zhecheng Wang 0001, Rebecca Lin, Daniel Miau, Florian Kainz, Jiawen Chen 0001, Xuaner Cecilia Zhang, David B. Lindell, Kiriakos N. Kutulakos
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.5
2023 Automatic High Resolution Wire Segmentation and Removal
abstract
Wires and powerlines are common visual distractions that often undermine the aesthetics of photographs. The manual process of precisely segmenting and removing them is extremely tedious and may take up hours, especially on high-resolution photos where wires may span the entire space. In this paper, we present an automatic wire clean-up system that eases the process of wire segmentation and removal/inpainting to within a few seconds. We observe several unique challenges: wires are thin, lengthy, and sparse. These are rare properties of subjects that common segmentation tasks cannot handle, especially in high-resolution images. We thus propose a two-stage method that leverages both global and local contexts to accurately segment wires in high-resolution images efficiently, and a tile-based inpainting strategy to remove the wires given our predicted segmentation masks. We also introduce the first wire segmentation benchmark dataset, WireSegHR. Finally, we demonstrate quantitatively and qualitatively that our wire clean-up system enables fully automated wire removal with great generalization to various wire appearances.
Mang Tik Chiu, Xuaner Cecilia Zhang, Zijun Wei, Yuqian Zhou, Eli Shechtman, Connelly Barnes, Zhe Lin 0001, Florian Kainz, Sohrab Amirghodsi, Humphrey Shi
CVPR8
2019 Multi-View Image Fusion
abstract
We present an end-to-end learned system for fusing multiple misaligned photographs of the same scene into a chosen target view. We demonstrate three use cases: 1) color transfer for inferring color for a monochrome view, 2) HDR fusion for merging misaligned bracketed exposures, and 3) detail transfer for reprojecting a high definition image to the point of view of an affordable VR180-camera. While the system can be trained end-to-end, it consists of three distinct steps: feature extraction, image warping and fusion. We present a novel cascaded feature extraction method that enables us to synergetically learn optical flow at different resolution levels. We show that this significantly improves the network's ability to learn large disparities. Finally, we demonstrate that our alignment architecture outperforms a state-of-the art optical flow network on the image warping task when both systems are trained in an identical manner.
Marc Comino, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Florian Kainz, Janne Kontkanen
ICCV3
2016 Burst photography for high dynamic range and low-light imaging on mobile cameras
abstract
Cell phone cameras have small apertures, which limits the number of photons they can gather, leading to noisy images in low light. They also have small sensor pixels, which limits the number of electrons each pixel can store, leading to limited dynamic range. We describe a computational photography pipeline that captures, aligns, and merges a burst of frames to reduce noise and increase dynamic range. Our system has several key features that help make it robust and efficient. First, we do not use bracketed exposures. Instead, we capture frames of constant exposure, which makes alignment more robust, and we set this exposure low enough to avoid blowing out highlights. The resulting merged image has clean shadows and high bit depth, allowing us to apply standard HDR tone mapping methods. Second, we begin from Bayer raw frames rather than the demosaicked RGB (or YUV) frames produced by hardware Image Signal Processors (ISPs) common on mobile platforms. This gives us more bits per pixel and allows us to circumvent the ISP's unwanted tone mapping and spatial denoising. Third, we use a novel FFT-based alignment algorithm and a hybrid 2D/3D Wiener filter to denoise and merge the frames in a burst. Our implementation is built atop Android's Camera2 API, which provides per-frame camera control and access to raw imagery, and is written in the Halide domain-specific language (DSL). It runs in 4 seconds on device (for a 12 Mpix image), requires no user intervention, and ships on several mass-produced cell phones.
Samuel W. Hasinoff, Dillon Sharlet, Ryan Geiss, Andrew Adams, Jonathan T. Barron, Florian Kainz, Jiawen Chen 0001, Marc Levoy
ACM Trans. Graph.6