Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Assumpta Sabater

dblp:21/4721 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction › constraint-based reasoning
geometric constraint reasoning
0.011991
Set membership approach to the propagation of uncertain geometric information · ICRA 1991
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
geometric uncertainty
0.011991
Set membership approach to the propagation of uncertain geometric information · ICRA 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

set-membership estimation · 0.0constraint graph propagation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 An ellipsoidal calculus based on propagation and fusion
abstract
Presents an ellipsoidal calculus based solely on two basic operations: propagation and fusion. Propagation refers to the problem of obtaining an ellipsoid that must satisfy an affine relation with another ellipsoid, and fusion to that of computing the ellipsoid that tightly bounds the intersection of two given ellipsoids. These two operations supersede the Minkowski sum and difference, affine transformation and intersection tight bounding of ellipsoids on which other ellipsoidal calculi are based. Actually, a Minkowski operation can be seen as a fusion followed by a propagation and an affine transformation as a particular case of propagation. Moreover, the presented formulation is numerically stable in the sense that it is immune to degeneracies of the involved ellipsoids and/or affine relations. Examples arising when manipulating uncertain geometric information in the context of the spatial interpretation of line drawings are extensively used as a testbed for the presented calculus.
Lluís Ros, Assumpta Sabater, Federico Thomas
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B2
1991 Set membership approach to the propagation of uncertain geometric information
abstract
An alternative approach for the propagation of uncertain geometric information, based on the ideas presented by J.R. Deller (IEEE ASSP Magazine, vol.6, p.4-20, Oct. 1989) and extended to deal with graphs of geometric constraints, is presented. This method avoids the independency assumption of the probabilistic approach. In this approach, when new sensory data are acquired, a set of strips is obtained, propagated, and fused to obtain the updated ellipsoids associated with each feature, Then, the hypothesis about the location of the involved geometric features can be easily updated. Inconsistencies are easily detected, resulting in fast rejection of erroneous data.>
Assumpta Sabater, Federico Thomas
ICRA1