Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Assumpta Sabater
dblp:21/4721
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction › constraint-based reasoning
geometric constraint reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Set membership approach to the propagation of uncertain geometric information · ICRA 1991 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
geometric uncertainty |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Set membership approach to the propagation of uncertain geometric information · ICRA 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
set-membership estimation · 0.0constraint graph propagation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | An ellipsoidal calculus based on propagation and fusionabstractPresents an ellipsoidal calculus based solely on two basic operations: propagation and fusion. Propagation refers to the problem of obtaining an ellipsoid that must satisfy an affine relation with another ellipsoid, and fusion to that of computing the ellipsoid that tightly bounds the intersection of two given ellipsoids. These two operations supersede the Minkowski sum and difference, affine transformation and intersection tight bounding of ellipsoids on which other ellipsoidal calculi are based. Actually, a Minkowski operation can be seen as a fusion followed by a propagation and an affine transformation as a particular case of propagation. Moreover, the presented formulation is numerically stable in the sense that it is immune to degeneracies of the involved ellipsoids and/or affine relations. Examples arising when manipulating uncertain geometric information in the context of the spatial interpretation of line drawings are extensively used as a testbed for the presented calculus. Lluís Ros, Assumpta Sabater, Federico Thomas |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B | 2 |
| 1991 | Set membership approach to the propagation of uncertain geometric informationabstractAn alternative approach for the propagation of uncertain geometric information, based on the ideas presented by J.R. Deller (IEEE ASSP Magazine, vol.6, p.4-20, Oct. 1989) and extended to deal with graphs of geometric constraints, is presented. This method avoids the independency assumption of the probabilistic approach. In this approach, when new sensory data are acquired, a set of strips is obtained, propagated, and fused to obtain the updated ellipsoids associated with each feature, Then, the hypothesis about the location of the involved geometric features can be easily updated. Inconsistencies are easily detected, resulting in fast rejection of erroneous data.> Assumpta Sabater, Federico Thomas |
ICRA | 1 |