Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eric Doi
dblp:21/8399
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interaction techniques and input › sketch-based interaction
sketch recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Grouping Strokes into Shapes in Hand-Drawn Diagrams · AAAI 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clustering · 0.1classification · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Grouping Strokes into Shapes in Hand-Drawn DiagramsabstractObjects in freely-drawn sketches often have no spatial or temporal separation, making object recognition difficult. We present a two-step stroke-grouping algorithm that first classifies individual strokes according to the type of object to which they belong, then groups strokes with like classifications into clusters representing individual objects. The first step facilitates clustering by naturally separating the strokes, and both steps fluidly integrate spatial and temporal information. Our approach to grouping is unique in its formulation as an efficient classification task rather than, for example, an expensive search task. Our single-stroke classifier performs at least as well as existing single-stroke classifiers on text vs. nontext classification, and we present the first three-way single-stroke classification results. Our stroke grouping results are the first reported of their kind; our grouping algorithm correctly groups between 86% and 91% of the ink in diagrams from two domains, with between 69% and 79% of shapes being perfectly clustered. Eric Jeffrey Peterson, Thomas F. Stahovich, Eric Doi, Christine Alvarado |
AAAI | 3 |