Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Isay Katsman
dblp:211/6801
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5195-4734ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Generative modeling · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% 3D vision · 20% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Equivariant Manifold Flows · NeurIPS 2021 Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Riemannian Residual Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
riemannian neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Riemannian Residual Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
equivariant flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Equivariant Manifold Flows · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
hyperbolic neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiating through the Fréchet Mean · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability With an Intermediate Level Attack · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability With an Intermediate Level Attack · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
black-box adversarial attack |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability With an Intermediate Level Attack · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fashion++: Minimal Edits for Outfit Improvement · ICCV 2019 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fashion++: Minimal Edits for Outfit Improvement · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial perturbation generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generative Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generative Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
adversarial example generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generative Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Riemannian Residual Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
manifold-valued data |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Riemannian Residual Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density estimation on manifolds |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › geometric graph neural network
hyperbolic graph neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Differentiating through the Fréchet Mean · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equations · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Generative Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Generative Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
activation maximization · 0.8symmetric positive definite matrices · 0.7residual connections · 0.7hyperbolic space · 0.7symmetry-invariant distribution learning · 0.5equivariance · 0.5riemannian optimization · 0.4neural ODE · 0.4local reparametrization · 0.4continuous change of variables · 0.4deep image generation · 0.4generative adversarial network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Revisiting Graph Learning Benchmarks: When is the Graph Actually Necessary?abstractAbstract Graph machine learning has enjoyed a meteoric rise in popularity since the introduction of deep learning in graph contexts. This is no surprise due to the ubiquity of graph data in large scale industrial settings. Tacitly assumed in all graph learning tasks is the separation of the graph structure and node features: node features strictly encode individual data while the graph structure consists only of pairwise interactions. The driving belief is that node features are (by themselves) insufficient for these tasks, so benchmark performance accurately reflects improvements in graph learning. In our paper, we challenge this orthodoxy by showing that, surprisingly, node features are oftentimes more-than-sufficient for many common graph benchmarks, breaking this critical assumption. When comparing against a well-tuned feature-only MLP baseline on seven of the most commonly used graph learning datasets, one gains little benefit from using graph structure on five datasets. We posit that these datasets do not benefit considerably from graph learning because the features themselves already contain enough graph information to obviate or substantially reduce the need for the graph. To illustrate this point, we perform a feature study on these datasets and show how the features are responsible for closing the gap between MLP and graph-method performance. Further, in service of introducing better empirical measures of progress for graph neural networks, we present a challenging parametric family of principled synthetic datasets that necessitate graph information for nontrivial performance. Lastly, we section out a subset of real-world datasets that are not trivially solved by an MLP and hence serve as reasonable benchmarks for graph neural networks. Isay Katsman, Ethan Lou, Anna Gilbert 0001 |
Neural Process. Lett. | 1 |
| 2023 | Riemannian Residual Neural NetworksabstractRecent methods in geometric deep learning have introduced various neural networks to operate over data that lie on Riemannian manifolds. Such networks are often necessary to learn well over graphs with a hierarchical structure or to learn over manifold-valued data encountered in the natural sciences. These networks are often inspired by and directly generalize standard Euclidean neural networks. However, extending Euclidean networks is difficult and has only been done for a select few manifolds. In this work, we examine the residual neural network (ResNet) and show how to extend this construction to general Riemannian manifolds in a geometrically principled manner. Originally introduced to help solve the vanishing gradient problem, ResNets have become ubiquitous in machine learning due to their beneficial learning properties, excellent empirical results, and easy-to-incorporate nature when building varied neural networks. We find that our Riemannian ResNets mirror these desirable properties: when compared to existing manifold neural networks designed to learn over hyperbolic space and the manifold of symmetric positive definite matrices, we outperform both kinds of networks in terms of relevant testing metrics and training dynamics. Isay Katsman, Eric Ming Chen, Sidhanth Holalkere, Anna Asch, Aaron Lou, Ser-Nam Lim, Christopher De Sa |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Equivariant Manifold FlowsabstractTractably modelling distributions over manifolds has long been an important goal in the natural sciences. Recent work has focused on developing general machine learning models to learn such distributions. However, for many applications these distributions must respect manifold symmetries—a trait which most previous models disregard. In this paper, we lay the theoretical foundations for learning symmetry-invariant distributions on arbitrary manifolds via equivariant manifold flows. We demonstrate the utility of our approach by learning quantum field theory-motivated invariant SU(n) densities and by correcting meteor impact dataset bias. Isay Katsman, Aaron Lou, Derek Lim, Qingxuan Jiang, Ser-Nam Lim, Christopher De Sa |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Differentiating through the Fréchet MeanabstractRecent advances in deep representation learning on Riemannian manifolds extend classical deep learning operations to better capture the geometry of the manifold. One possible extension is the Fr{é}chet mean, the generalization of the Euclidean mean; however, it has been difficult to apply because it lacks a closed form with an easily computable derivative. In this paper, we show how to differentiate through the Fr{é}chet mean for arbitrary Riemannian manifolds. Then, focusing on hyperbolic space, we derive explicit gradient expressions and a fast, accurate, and hyperparameter-free Fr{é}chet mean solver. This fully integrates the Fr{é}chet mean into the hyperbolic neural network pipeline. To demonstrate this integration, we present two case studies. First, we apply our Fr{é}chet mean to the existing Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Network, replacing its projected aggregation to obtain state-of-the-art results on datasets with high hyperbolicity. Second, to demonstrate the Fr{é}chet mean’s capacity to generalize Euclidean neural network operations, we develop a hyperbolic batch normalization method that gives an improvement parallel to the one observed in the Euclidean setting. Aaron Lou, Isay Katsman, Qingxuan Jiang, Serge J. Belongie, Ser-Nam Lim, Christopher De Sa |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential EquationsabstractTo better conform to data geometry, recent deep generative modelling techniques adapt Euclidean constructions to non-Euclidean spaces. In this paper, we study normalizing flows on manifolds. Previous work has developed flow models for specific cases; however, these advancements hand craft layers on a manifold-by-manifold basis, restricting generality and inducing cumbersome design constraints. We overcome these issues by introducing Neural Manifold Ordinary Differential Equations, a manifold generalization of Neural ODEs, which enables the construction of Manifold Continuous Normalizing Flows (MCNFs). MCNFs require only local geometry (therefore generalizing to arbitrary manifolds) and compute probabilities with continuous change of variables (allowing for a simple and expressive flow construction). We find that leveraging continuous manifold dynamics produces a marked improvement for both density estimation and downstream tasks. Aaron Lou, Derek Lim, Isay Katsman, Leo Huang, Qingxuan Jiang, Ser-Nam Lim, Christopher De Sa |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Fashion++: Minimal Edits for Outfit ImprovementabstractGiven an outfit, what small changes would most improve its fashionability? This question presents an intriguing new computer vision challenge. We introduce Fashion++, an approach that proposes minimal adjustments to a full-body clothing outfit that will have maximal impact on its fashionability. Our model consists of a deep image generation neural network that learns to synthesize clothing conditioned on learned per-garment encodings. The latent encodings are explicitly factorized according to shape and texture, thereby allowing direct edits for both fit/presentation and color/patterns/material, respectively. We show how to bootstrap Web photos to automatically train a fashionability model, and develop an activation maximization-style approach to transform the input image into its more fashionable self. The edits suggested range from swapping in a new garment to tweaking its color, how it is worn (e.g., rolling up sleeves), or its fit (e.g., making pants baggier). Experiments demonstrate that Fashion++ provides successful edits, both according to automated metrics and human opinion. Wei-Lin Hsiao, Isay Katsman, Chao-Yuan Wu, Devi Parikh, Kristen Grauman |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2019 | Enhancing Adversarial Example Transferability With an Intermediate Level AttackabstractNeural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, malicious inputs crafted to fool trained models. Adversarial examples often exhibit black-box transfer, meaning that adversarial examples for one model can fool another model. However, adversarial examples are typically overfit to exploit the particular architecture and feature representation of a source model, resulting in sub-optimal black-box transfer attacks to other target models. We introduce the Intermediate Level Attack (ILA), which attempts to fine-tune an existing adversarial example for greater black-box transferability by increasing its perturbation on a pre-specified layer of the source model, improving upon state-of-the-art methods. We show that we can select a layer of the source model to perturb without any knowledge of the target models while achieving high transferability. Additionally, we provide some explanatory insights regarding our method and the effect of optimizing for adversarial examples using intermediate feature maps. Isay Katsman, Zeqi Gu, Horace He, Serge J. Belongie, Ser-Nam Lim |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2018 | Generative Adversarial PerturbationsabstractIn this paper, we propose novel generative models for creating adversarial examples, slightly perturbed images resembling natural images but maliciously crafted to fool pre-trained models. We present trainable deep neural networks for transforming images to adversarial perturbations. Our proposed models can produce image-agnostic and image-dependent perturbations for both targeted and non-targeted attacks. We also demonstrate that similar architectures can achieve impressive results in fooling classification and semantic segmentation models, obviating the need for hand-crafting attack methods for each task. Using extensive experiments on challenging high-resolution datasets such as ImageNet and Cityscapes, we show that our perturbations achieve high fooling rates with small perturbation norms. Moreover, our attacks are considerably faster than current iterative methods at inference time. Omid Poursaeed, Isay Katsman, Bicheng Gao, Serge J. Belongie |
CVPR | 2 |