Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mithun Babu

dblp:211/8028 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
nonholonomic trajectory optimization
0.412020
Bi-Convex Approximation of Non-Holonomic Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.412020
Bi-Convex Approximation of Non-Holonomic Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2020
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
bi-convex optimization
0.112020
Bi-Convex Approximation of Non-Holonomic Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.112020
Bi-Convex Approximation of Non-Holonomic Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential quadratic programming · 0.9convex surrogate · 0.9alternating minimization · 0.9interior-point method · 0.4interior point method · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Bi-Convex Approximation of Non-Holonomic Trajectory Optimization
abstract
Autonomous cars and fixed-wing aerial vehicles have the so-called non-holonomic kinematics which non-linearly maps control input to states. As a result, trajectory optimization with such a motion model becomes highly non-linear and non-convex. In this paper, we improve the computational tractability of non-holonomic trajectory optimization by reformulating it in terms of a set of bi-convex cost and constraint functions along with a non-linear penalty. The bi-convex part acts as a relaxation for the non-holonomic trajectory optimization while the residual of the penalty dictates how well its output obeys the non-holonomic behavior. We adopt an alternating minimization approach for solving the reformulated problem and show that it naturally leads to the replacement of the challenging non-linear penalty with a globally valid convex surrogate. Along with the common cost functions modeling goal-reaching, trajectory smoothness, etc., the proposed optimizer can also accommodate a class of non-linear costs for modeling goal-sets, while retaining the bi-convex structure. We benchmark the proposed optimizer against off-the-shelf solvers implementing sequential quadratic programming and interior-point methods and show that it produces solutions with similar or better cost as the former while significantly outperforming the latter. Furthermore, as compared to both off-the-shelf solvers, the proposed optimizer achieves more than 20x reduction in computation time.
Arun Kumar Singh 0001, Raghu Ram Theerthala, Mithun Babu, Unni Krishnan R. Nair, K. Madhava Krishna
ICRA3
2019 Motion Planning Framework for Autonomous Vehicles: A Time Scaled Collision Cone Interleaved Model Predictive Control Approach
abstract
Planning frameworks for autonomous vehicles must be robust and computationally efficient for real time realization. At the same time, they should accommodate the unpredictable behavior of the other participants and produce safe trajectories. In this paper, we present a computationally efficient hierarchical planning framework for autonomous vehicles that can generate safe trajectories in complex driving scenarios, which are commonly encountered in urban traffic settings. The first level of the proposed framework constructs a Model Predictive Control(MPC)routine using an efficient difference of convex programmingapproach, that generates smooth and collision-free trajectories. The constraints on curvature and road boundaries are seamlessly integrated into this optimization routine. The second layer is mainly responsible to handle the unpredictable behaviors that are typically exhibited by the other participants of traffic. It is built along the lines of time scaled collision cone(TSCC)which optimize for the velocities along the trajectory to handle such disturbances. We additionally show that our framework maintains optimal balance between temporal and path deviations while executing safe trajectories. To demonstrate the efficacy of the presented framework we validated it in extensive simulations in different driving scenarios like over taking, lane merging and jaywalking among many dynamic and static obstacles.
Raghu Ram Theerthala, A. V. S. Sai Bhargav Kumar, Mithun Babu, Phani-Teja Singamaneni, K. Madhava Krishna
IV3
2018 A Novel Lane Merging Framework with Probabilistic Risk based Lane Selection using Time Scaled Collision Cone
abstract
Conventionally, planning frameworks for autonomous vehicles consider large safety margins and pre- defined paths for performing the merge maneuvers. These considerations often increase the wait time at the intersec- tions leading to traffic disruption. In this paper, we present a motion planning framework for autonomous vehicles to perform merge maneuver in dense traffic. Our framework is divided into a two-layer structure, Lane Selection layer and Scale optimization layer. The Lane Selection layer computes the likelihood of collision along the lanes. This likelihood represents the collision risk associated with each lane and is used for lane selection. Subsequently, the Scale optimization layer solves the time scaled collision cone (TSCC) constraint re- actively for collision-free velocities. Our framework guarantees a collision-free merging even in dense traffic with minimum disruption. Furthermore, we show the simulation results in different merging scenarios to demonstrate the efficacy of our framework.
A. V. S. Sai Bhargav Kumar, Adarsh Modh, Mithun Babu, Bharath Gopalakrishnan, K. Madhava Krishna
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium3