Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shweta Garg 0001

dblp:212/0267-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1737-0406ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program synthesis and code generation · 68% Empirical software engineering · 32%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 47% Reinforcement learning · 28% Language models and text generation · 25%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
code agent
1.012026
CODESTRUCT: Code Agents over Structured Action Spaces · ACL (1) 2026
Program synthesis and code generation
code assistance
0.912025
CodeAssistBench (CAB): Dataset & Benchmarking for Multi-turn Chat-Based Code Assistance · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › community question answering
answer selection
0.412019
Improving Answer Selection and Answer Triggering using Hard Negatives · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
factored action spaces
0.312026
CODESTRUCT: Code Agents over Structured Action Spaces · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312025
CodeAssistBench (CAB): Dataset & Benchmarking for Multi-turn Chat-Based Code Assistance · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
answer triggering
0.112019
Improving Answer Selection and Answer Triggering using Hard Negatives · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structured action spaces · 2.0code agents · 2.0simulated user evaluation · 1.7containerization · 1.7hard negative mining · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CODESTRUCT: Code Agents over Structured Action Spaces
abstract
Myeongsoo Kim, Chao-Chun Hsu, Dingmin Wang, Shweta Garg, Varun Kumar, Murali Krishna Ramanathan. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Myeongsoo Kim, Chao-Chun Hsu, Dingmin Wang, Shweta Garg 0001, Murali Krishna Ramanathan
ACL (1)4
2025 CodeAssistBench (CAB): Dataset & Benchmarking for Multi-turn Chat-Based Code Assistance
abstract
Programming assistants powered by large language models have transformed software development, yet most benchmarks focus narrowly on code generation tasks. Recent efforts like InfiBench and StackEval attempt to address this gap using Stack Overflow data but remain limited to single-turn interactions in isolated contexts, require significant manual curation, and fail to represent complete project environments. We introduce CodeAssistBench (CAB), the first benchmark framework for evaluating multi-turn programming assistance in realistic settings that address questions grounded in actual codebases. Unlike existing programming Q&A benchmarks, CAB automatically generates scalable datasets from GitHub issues tagged with questions using configurable parameters (e.g., repository creation date, star count, programming languages), and includes automatic containerization of codebases for evaluation. It then evaluates models through simulated users in these containerized environments with full codebase access. Using this framework, we constructed a test set of 3,286 real-world programming questions across 214 repositories, spanning seven programming languages and diverse problem domains. Our evaluation of leading LLMs reveals a substantial capability gap: while models perform well on Stack Overflow questions with success rates of 70-83%, they resolve only up to 16.49% of CAB's issues from recent repositories (post-training cutoff). This discrepancy highlights the challenges of providing assistance in complex, project-specific contexts versus answering standalone questions. Our fully automated framework enables continuous benchmark expansion and is available at https://github.com/amazon-science/CodeAssistBench/.
Myeongsoo Kim, Shweta Garg 0001, Baishakhi Ray, Anoop Deoras
NeurIPS2
2019 Improving Answer Selection and Answer Triggering using Hard Negatives
abstract
Sawan Kumar, Shweta Garg, Kartik Mehta, Nikhil Rasiwasia. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Sawan Kumar, Shweta Garg 0001, Kartik Mehta, Nikhil Rasiwasia
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)2