Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefan Saftescu
dblp:213/8287
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 71% 3D vision · 29% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kidnapped Radar: Topological Radar Localisation using Rotationally-Invariant Metric Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › range-based localization
radar localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kidnapped Radar: Topological Radar Localisation using Rotationally-Invariant Metric Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › map-based localization
topological localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kidnapped Radar: Topological Radar Localisation using Rotationally-Invariant Metric Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Meshed Up: Learnt Error Correction in 3D Reconstructions · ICRA 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Meshed Up: Learnt Error Correction in 3D Reconstructions · ICRA 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Meshed Up: Learnt Error Correction in 3D Reconstructions · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metric learning · 0.4cylindrical convolution · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4NetVLAD · 0.4machine learning · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Look Here: Learning Geometrically Consistent Refinement of Inverse-Depth Images for 3D ReconstructionabstractBuilding good 3D maps is a challenging and expensive task, which requires high-quality sensors and careful, time-consuming scanning. We seek to reduce the cost of building good reconstructions by correcting views of existing low-quality ones in a post-hoc fashion using learnt priors over surfaces and appearance. We train a convolutional neural network model to predict the difference in inverse-depth from varying viewpoints of two meshes — one of low-quality that we wish to correct, and one of high-quality that we use as a reference. Our full model runs at 11.3[Formula: see text]Hz when aggregating four input views. In contrast to previous work, we pay attention to the problem of excessive smoothing in corrected meshes. We address this with a suitable network architecture, and introduce a loss-weighting mechanism that emphasizes edges in the prediction. Furthermore, smooth predictions result in geometrical inconsistencies. To deal with this issue, we present a loss function which penalizes re-projection differences that are not due to occlusions. Future applications of this work will incorporate semantic scene understanding in a multi-task learning setting. We explore the efficacy of the proposed system in terms of gross error correction and generalization capability by showing its performance in practice on a subset of the Kitti Odometry dataset, complete with a component-wise ablation study. We evaluate correctness and completeness measures of surface reconstruction across viewpoints and show that the proposed system is introspective in regions lacking sufficient high-quality supervision — indeed, models trained with geometric consistency loss create a lot more surface in areas that were not supervised, in one case filling in 67.97% or 8010[Formula: see text]m2 of an unlabeled input region. Finally, we assess the practical applicability of our method at large-scale by experiments over the full scope of the Kitti Odometry dataset. Broadly, as a measure of effectiveness, our model reduces gross errors by 45.3–77.5%, up to five times more than previous work. We also assess the practical applicability of our method to 3D reconstruction at large scales and find that compared to the baseline our model shows better stability in correctness when improving completeness of surfaces, and is effective in reducing median total error by up to 21.8[Formula: see text]cm. Stefan Saftescu, Matthew Gadd, Paul Newman 0001 |
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2020 | Kidnapped Radar: Topological Radar Localisation using Rotationally-Invariant Metric LearningabstractThis paper presents a system for robust, large-scale topological localisation using Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave scanning radar which extends the state-of-the-art by an efficient, learning-based approach to handle radar data for localisation. We learn a metric space for embedding polar radar scans using CNN and NetVLAD architectures traditionally applied to the visual domain. However, we tailor the feature extraction for more suitability to the polar nature of radar scan formation using cylindrical convolutions, anti-aliasing blurring, and azimuth-wise max-pooling; all in order to bolster the rotational invariance. The enforced metric space is then used to encode a reference trajectory, serving as a map, which is queried for nearest neighbour for recognition of places at run-time. We demonstrate the performance of our topological localisation system over the course of many repeat forays using the largest radar-focused mobile autonomy dataset released to date, totalling 280 km of urban driving, a small portion of which we also use to learn the weights of the modified architecture. As this work represents a novel application for radar, we analyse the utility of the proposed method via a comprehensive set of metrics which provide insight into the efficacy when used in a realistic system, showing improved performance over the root architecture even in the face of random rotational perturbation. Stefan Saftescu, Matthew Gadd, Daniele De Martini, Dan Barnes, Paul Newman 0001 |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2018 | Meshed Up: Learnt Error Correction in 3D ReconstructionsabstractDense reconstructions often contain errors that prior work has so far minimised using high quality sensors and regularising the output. Nevertheless, errors still persist. This paper proposes a machine learning technique to identify errors in three dimensional (3D) meshes. Beyond simply identifying errors, our method quantifies both the magnitude and the direction of depth estimate errors when viewing the scene. This enables us to Improve the reconstruction accuracy. We train a suitably deep network architecture with two 3D meshes: a high-quality laser reconstruction, and a lower quality stereo image reconstruction. The network predicts the amount of error in the lower quality reconstruction with respect to the high-quality one, having only view the former through its input. We evaluate our approach by correcting two dimensional (2D) inverse-depth images extracted from the 3D model, and show that our method improves the quality of these depth reconstructions by up to a relative 10% RMSE. Michael Tanner, Stefan Saftescu, Alex Bewley, Paul Newman 0001 |
ICRA | 2 |