Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fuxin Wang

dblp:213/9542 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration
demosaicing
0.412019
Low Cost Edge Sensing for High Quality Demosaicking · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2019
Image and video processing › image restoration › demosaicing
edge-sensing demosaicing
0.412019
Low Cost Edge Sensing for High Quality Demosaicking · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2019
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.412019
Low Cost Edge Sensing for High Quality Demosaicking · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logistic function · 0.4edge sensing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Low Cost Edge Sensing for High Quality Demosaicking
abstract
Digital cameras that use Color Filter Arrays (CFA) entail a demosaicking procedure to form full RGB images. To digital camera industry, demosaicking speed is as important as demosaicking accuracy, because camera users have been accustomed to viewing captured photos instantly. Moreover, the cost associated with demosaicking should not go beyond the cost saved by using CFA. For this purpose, we revisit the classical Hamilton-Adams (HA) algorithm, which outperforms many sophisticated techniques in both speed and accuracy. Our analysis shows that the HA pipeline is highly efficient to exploit the originally captured data, but its oversimplified inter- and intra-channel smoothness formulation hinders its accuracy. We therefore propose a very low cost edge sensing scheme, which guides demosaicking by a logistic functional of the difference between directional variations. We extensively compare our algorithm with 27 demosaicking algorithms by running their open source codes on benchmark datasets. Compared to methods of similar computational cost, our method achieves substantially higher accuracy; Whereas compared to methods of similar accuracy, our method has significantly lower cost. On test images of currently popular resolution, the quality of our algorithm is comparable to top performers, yet our speed is tens of times faster. Source code for this work will be released with paper publication.
Yan Niu, Jihong Ouyang, Wanli Zuo, Fuxin Wang
IEEE Trans. Image Process.4