We present AgentSeer, an interactive observability framework for agentic AI systems. Unlike conventional tracing tools that expose raw spans or model-centric metrics, AgentSeer introduces a dual graph decomposition constructed through a deterministic rule-based parser: a temporal action graph, where each prompt or tool invocation is represented as a distinct action, and a component graph capturing architectural relations among agents, tools, and memory modules. Beyond visualization, AgentSeer enables action-level red teaming, where jailbreak payloads are systematically attached to every action node (including agent messages, tool calls, and memory retrievals) to uncover vulnerabilities invisible to model-level testing. Our demonstration features a six-agent hierarchical testbed with interactive visualization and deployment-oriented safety evaluation applied directly on the same prompts and contexts, systematically revealing high-risk interactions, context-dependent vulnerabilities, and emergent behaviors. By combining structured decomposition, automated red teaming, and rule-based reliability, AgentSeer establishes a safety-first methodology for observability in multi-agent AI.

Modern Agentic AI systems plan, reason, and act across multiple steps, creating execution patterns that are difficult to interpret. Existing observability platforms track prompt I/O and operational metrics but require manual inspection of traces to reconstruct structure and reasoning. We present AgentGraph, which converts execution logs into interactive knowledge graphs and actionable insights. Nodes represent agents, tasks, tools, data inputs/outputs, and humans, while typed edges capture relations such as inputs consumed, tasks delegated or sequenced, tools required or used, outputs produced and delivered, and interventions from agents or humans. Each graph element links to its exact trace span, ensuring verifiability. Building on this representation, AgentGraph enables two analyses: qualitative trace-grounded failure detection and optimisation recommendations, and quantitative robustness evaluation via perturbation testing and causal attribution.

The development of unbiased large language models is widely recognized as crucial, yet existing benchmarks fall short in detecting biases due to limited scope, contamination, and lack of a fairness baseline. SAGED(bias) is the first holistic benchmarking pipeline to address these problems. The pipeline encompasses five core stages: scraping materials, assembling benchmarks, generating responses, extracting numeric features, and diagnosing with disparity metrics. SAGED includes metrics for max disparity, such as impact ratio, and bias concentration, such as Max Z-scores. Noticing that metric tool bias and contextual bias in prompts can distort evaluation, SAGED implements counterfactual branching and baseline calibration for mitigation. For demonstration, we use SAGED on G20 Countries with popular 8b-level models including Gemma2, Llama3.1, Mistral, and Qwen2. With sentiment analysis, we find that while Mistral and Qwen2 show lower max disparity and higher bias concentration than Gemma2 and Llama3.1, all models are notably biased against countries like Russia and (except for Qwen2) China. With further experiments to have models role-playing U.S. presidents, we see bias amplifies and shifts in heterogeneous directions. Moreover, we see Qwen2 and Mistral not engage in role-playing, while Llama3.1 and Gemma2 role-play Trump notably more intensively than Biden and Harris, indicating role-playing performance bias in these models.

Traditional machine learning methods for movement recognition often struggle with limited model interpretability and a lack of insight into human movement dynamics. This study introduces a novel representation learning framework based on causal inference to address these challenges. Our twostage approach combines the Peter-Clark (PC) algorithm and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to identify and quantify causal relationships between human joints. By capturing joint interactions, the proposed causal Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) produces interpretable and robust representations. Experimental results on the EmoPain dataset demonstrate that the causal GCN outperforms traditional GCNs in accuracy, F1 score, and recall, particularly in detecting protective behaviors. This work contributes to advancing human motion analysis and lays a foundation for adaptive and intelligent healthcare solutions.