Event reasoning is to reason with events and certain inter-event relations. These cutting-edge techniques possess crucial and fundamental capabilities that underlie various applications. Large language models (LLMs) have made advances in event reasoning owing to their wealth of training. However, the LLMs commonly used today still do not consistently demonstrate proficiency in managing event reasoning as humans. This discrepancy arises from not explicitly modeling events and their relations and insufficient knowledge of event relations. In addition, the different reasoning paradigms of the LLMs are trained in an imbalanced way. In this paper, we propose WIZARDEVENT, to synthesize data from the unlabeled corpus with the proposed hybrid event-aware instruction tuning. Specifically, we first represent the events and their relation in a novel structure and then extract the knowledge from the raw text. Second, we introduce hybrid event reasoning paradigms with four reasoning formats. Lastly, we wrap our constructed WIZARDEVENT with the paradigms to create the instruction tuning dataset. We fine-tune the model with this enriched dataset, significantly improving the event reasoning. The performance of WIZARDEVENT is rigorously evaluated through extensive experiments. The results demonstrate that WIZARDEVENT substantially outperforms baselines, indicating the effectiveness of our approach.

Event reasoning is a fundamental ability that underlies many applications. It requires event schema knowledge to perform global reasoning and needs to deal with the diversity of the inter-event relations and the reasoning paradigms. The extent to which LLMs excel in event reasoning across various relations and reasoning paradigms has not been thoroughly investigated. Additionally, it is still unclear whether LLMs utilize event knowledge in the same way humans do. To mitigate this disparity, we comprehensively evaluate the abilities of event reasoning of LLMs on different relations, paradigms, and levels of abstraction. We introduce a novel benchmark EV2 for EValuation of EVent reasoning. EV2 consists of two levels of evaluation on schema and instance and is comprehensive in relations and reasoning paradigms. We conduct extensive experiments on EV2. We find that 1) LLMs have abilities to accomplish event reasoning but their performances are far from satisfactory. 2) There are imbalances of event reasoning abilities on different relations and paradigms. 3) LLMs have event schema knowledge, however, they're not aligned with humans on how to utilize the knowledge. Based on these findings, we guide the LLMs in utilizing the event schema knowledge as memory leading to improvements in event reasoning.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant advancements in code generation, yet they still face challenges when tackling tasks that extend beyond their basic capabilities. Recently, the concept of self-debugging has been proposed as a way to enhance code generation performance by leveraging execution feedback from tests. However, the availability of high-quality tests in real-world scenarios is often limited. In this context, self-debugging with self-generated tests emerges as a promising solution, though its limitations and practical potential have not been fully explored. To address this gap, we investigate the efficacy of self-debugging in code generation tasks. We propose and analyze two distinct paradigms for the self-debugging process: post-execution and in-execution self-debugging. Our findings reveal that post-execution self-debugging struggles with the test bias introduced by self-generated tests, which can lead to misleading feedback. In contrast, in-execution self-debugging enables LLMs to mitigate this bias and leverage intermediate states during program execution. By focusing on runtime information rather than relying solely on potentially flawed self-generated tests, this approach demonstrates significant promise for improving the robustness and accuracy of LLMs in code generation tasks.