Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ali Momen

dblp:216/5613 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 56% Usability and user experience research · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › robot perception
robot face perception
0.612022
The Inversion Effect as a Measure of Social Acceptance of Robots · HRI 2022
Usability and user experience research › user perception
social acceptability
0.612022
The Inversion Effect as a Measure of Social Acceptance of Robots · HRI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.6inversion task · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 The Inversion Effect as a Measure of Social Acceptance of Robots
abstract
If robots could engage face-processing they would increase the likelihood they are accepted as social companions. However, research has not examined whether and when robot “faces” engage face-processing. The current study examined whether facial-width-to-height ratio (FWHR) modulated face-processing with robots using the “inversion task”-a commonly utilized measure of face perception that leverages the finding that inverting face stimuli hurts recognition performance (i.e., inversion effects) compared to other types of stimuli. We predicted that recognition performance would be more effected by inversion when robots had a low rather than high FWHR. While our statistical results were not significant, descriptive results trended in favor of our hypothesis, demonstrating robots with a lower FHWR had larger inversion effects than robot with a higher FWHR. While more research will be needed to clarify these results, the inversion task is a potentially useful tool to measure the social acceptance of robots through the detection of facial processing.
Ali Momen, Eva Wiese
HRI1