Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Utku Diril

dblp:217/0471 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-0915-810XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 69% Memory systems · 23% Cloud and datacenter computing · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
1.232023
MTIA: First Generation Silicon Targeting Meta's Recommendation Systems · ISCA 2023
RecNMP: Accelerating Personalized Recommendation with Near-Memory Processing · ISCA 2020
Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective · HPCA 2018
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
inference accelerator
0.712023
MTIA: First Generation Silicon Targeting Meta's Recommendation Systems · ISCA 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
recommendation system accelerator
0.712023
MTIA: First Generation Silicon Targeting Meta's Recommendation Systems · ISCA 2023
Memory systems › processing-in-memory
near-memory processing
0.412020
RecNMP: Accelerating Personalized Recommendation with Near-Memory Processing · ISCA 2020
Memory systems
processing-in-memory
0.412020
RecNMP: Accelerating Personalized Recommendation with Near-Memory Processing · ISCA 2020
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
recommendation model accelerator
0.412020
RecNMP: Accelerating Personalized Recommendation with Near-Memory Processing · ISCA 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.312018
Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective · HPCA 2018
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter infrastructure
0.312018
Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective · HPCA 2018
Recommender systems
DLRM inference
0.212023
MTIA: First Generation Silicon Targeting Meta's Recommendation Systems · ISCA 2023
Recommender systems
recommendation
0.212023
MTIA: First Generation Silicon Targeting Meta's Recommendation Systems · ISCA 2023
Memory systems
DRAM
0.112020
RecNMP: Accelerating Personalized Recommendation with Near-Memory Processing · ISCA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pytorch software stack · 1.3GEMM optimization · 1.3GPU training · 0.7CPU inference · 0.7table-aware packet scheduling · 0.4memory-side caching · 0.4hot entry profiling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 MTIA: First Generation Silicon Targeting Meta's Recommendation Systems
abstract
Meta has traditionally relied on using CPU-based servers for running inference workloads, specifically Deep Learning Recommendation Models (DLRM), but the increasing compute and memory requirements of these models have pushed the company towards using specialized solutions such as GPUs or other hardware accelerators. This paper describes the company's effort in constructing its first silicon specifically designed for recommendation systems; it describes the accelerator architecture and platform design, the software stack for enabling and optimizing PyTorch-based models and provides an initial performance evaluation. With our emerging software stack, we have made significant progress towards reaching the same or higher efficiency as the GPU: We averaged 0.9x perf/W across various DLRMs, and benchmarks show operators such as GEMMs reaching 2x perf/W. Finally, the paper describes the lessons we learned during this journey which can improve the performance and programmability of future generations of architecture.
Amin Firoozshahian, Joel Coburn, Roman Levenstein, Rakesh Nattoji, Ashwin Kamath, Olívia Wu, Gurdeepak Grewal, Harish Aepala, Bhasker Jakka, Bob Dreyer, Adam Hutchin, Utku Diril, Krishnakumar Nair, Ehsan K. Ardestani, Martin Schatz, Yuchen Hao, Rakesh Komuravelli, Kunming Ho, Sameer Abu Asal, Joe Shajrawi, Kevin Quinn 0006, Nagesh Sreedhara, Pankaj Kansal, Willie Wei, Dheepak Jayaraman, Linda Cheng, Pritam Chopda, Ajay Bikumandla, Arun Karthik Sengottuvel, Krishna Thottempudi, Ashwin Narasimha, Brian Dodds, Cao Gao, Jiyuan Zhang 0008, Mohammed Al-Sanabani, Ana Zehtabioskuie, Jordan Fix, Hangchen Yu, Kaustubh Gondkar, Jack Montgomery, Mike Tsai, Saritha Dwarakapuram, Sanjay Desai, Nili Avidan, Poorvaja Ramani, Karthik Narayanan, Ajit Mathews, Sethu Gopal, Maxim Naumov, Vijay Rao, Krishna Noru, Harikrishna Reddy, Prahlad Venkatapuram, Alexis Bjorlin
ISCA12
2020 RecNMP: Accelerating Personalized Recommendation with Near-Memory Processing
abstract
Personalized recommendation systems leverage deep learning models and account for the majority of data center AI cycles. Their performance is dominated by memory-bound sparse embedding operations with unique irregular memory access patterns that pose a fundamental challenge to accelerate. This paper proposes a lightweight, commodity DRAM compliant, near-memory processing solution to accelerate personalized recommendation inference. The in-depth characterization of production-grade recommendation models shows that embedding operations with high model-, operator and data-level parallelism lead to memory bandwidth saturation, limiting recommendation inference performance. We propose RecNMP which provides a scalable solution to improve system throughput, supporting a broad range of sparse embedding models. RecNMP is specifically tailored to production environments with heavy co-location of operators on a single server. Several hardware/software cooptimization techniques such as memory-side caching, tableaware packet scheduling, and hot entry profiling are studied, providing up to 9.8× memory latency speedup over a highly-optimized baseline. Overall, RecNMP offers 4.2× throughput improvement and 45.8% memory energy savings.
Liu Ke 0001, Udit Gupta 0001, Benjamin Y. Cho, David Brooks 0001, Vikas Chandra, Utku Diril, Amin Firoozshahian, Kim M. Hazelwood, Bill Jia, Hsien-Hsin S. Lee, Meng Li 0004, Bert Maher, Dheevatsa Mudigere, Maxim Naumov, Martin Schatz, Mikhail Smelyanskiy, Xiaodong Wang 0020, Brandon Reagen, Carole-Jean Wu, Mark Hempstead, Xuan Zhang 0001
ISCA6
2018 Applied Machine Learning at Facebook: A Datacenter Infrastructure Perspective
abstract
Machine learning sits at the core of many essential products and services at Facebook. This paper describes the hardware and software infrastructure that supports machine learning at global scale. Facebook's machine learning workloads are extremely diverse: services require many different types of models in practice. This diversity has implications at all layers in the system stack. In addition, a sizable fraction of all data stored at Facebook flows through machine learning pipelines, presenting significant challenges in delivering data to high-performance distributed training flows. Computational requirements are also intense, leveraging both GPU and CPU platforms for training and abundant CPU capacity for real-time inference. Addressing these and other emerging challenges continues to require diverse efforts that span machine learning algorithms, software, and hardware design.
Kim M. Hazelwood, Sarah Bird, David Brooks 0001, Soumith Chintala, Utku Diril, Dmytro Dzhulgakov, Mohamed Fawzy, Bill Jia, Yangqing Jia, Aditya Kalro, James Law, Jason Lu, Pieter Noordhuis, Mikhail Smelyanskiy, Liang Xiong, Xiaodong Wang 0020
HPCA5