Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yu Takagi

dblp:217/8879 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0503-785XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 65% Generative modeling · 35%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 78% Medical and health informatics · 22%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
1.222024
Unveiling Multi-level and Multi-modal Semantic Representations in the Human Brain using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Demixed shared component analysis of neural population data from multiple brain areas · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning
0.912025
Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model
0.712023
High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain decoding
0.712023
High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023
Medical and health informatics
neuroimaging
0.712023
High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population analysis
0.412020
Demixed shared component analysis of neural population data from multiple brain areas · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model representation
0.212024
Unveiling Multi-level and Multi-modal Semantic Representations in the Human Brain using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image reconstruction
0.212023
High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity · CVPR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.5fMRI decoding · 1.5stable diffusion · 1.3functional magnetic resonance imaging · 1.3supervised fine-tuning · 0.9perplexity analysis · 0.9layer-wise analysis · 0.9demixed shared component analysis · 0.4component analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Massive Supervised Fine-tuning Experiments Reveal How Data, Layer, and Training Factors Shape LLM Alignment Quality
abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a critical step in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human instructions and values, yet many aspects of SFT remain poorly understood.We trained a wide range of base models on a variety of datasets including code generation, mathematical reasoning, and general-domain tasks, resulting in 1,000+ SFT models under controlled conditions.We then identified the dataset properties that matter most and examined the layer-wise modifications introduced by SFT.Our findings reveal that some training-task synergies persist across all models while others vary substantially, emphasizing the importance of model-specific strategies.Moreover, we demonstrate that perplexity consistently predicts SFT effectiveness, often surpassing superficial similarity between the training data and the benchmark, and that mid-layer weight changes correlate most strongly with performance gains.We release these 1,000+ SFT models and benchmark results to accelerate further research.All resources are available at https://github.
Yuto Harada, Yusuke Yamauchi, Yusuke Oda, Yohei Oseki, Yusuke Miyao, Yu Takagi
EMNLP6
2024 Unveiling Multi-level and Multi-modal Semantic Representations in the Human Brain using Large Language Models
abstract
Yuko Nakagi, Takuya Matsuyama, Naoko Koide-Majima, Hiroto Q. Yamaguchi, Rieko Kubo, Shinji Nishimoto, Yu Takagi. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Yuko Nakagi, Takuya Matsuyama, Naoko Koide-Majima, Hiroto Yamaguchi, Rieko Kubo, Shinji Nishimoto, Yu Takagi
EMNLP7
2023 High-resolution image reconstruction with latent diffusion models from human brain activity
abstract
Reconstructing visual experiences from human brain activity offers a unique way to understand how the brain represents the world, and to interpret the connection between computer vision models and our visual system. While deep generative models have recently been employed for this task, reconstructing realistic images with high semantic fidelity is still a challenging problem. Here, we propose a new method based on a diffusion model (DM) to reconstruct images from human brain activity obtained via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). More specifically, we rely on a latent diffusion model (LDM) termed Stable Diffusion. This model reduces the computational cost of DMs, while preserving their high generative performance. We also characterize the inner mechanisms of the LDM by studying how its different components (such as the latent vector of image Z, conditioning inputs C, and different elements of the denoising U-Net) relate to distinct brain functions. We show that our proposed method can reconstruct high-resolution images with high fidelity in straight-forward fashion, without the need for any additional training and fine-tuning of complex deep-learning models. We also provide a quantitative interpretation of different LDM components from a neuroscientific perspective. Overall, our study proposes a promising method for reconstructing images from human brain activity, and provides a new framework for understanding DMs. Please check out our webpage at https://sites.google.com/view/stablediffusion-withbrain/.
Yu Takagi, Shinji Nishimoto
CVPR1
2020 Demixed shared component analysis of neural population data from multiple brain areas
abstract
Recent advances in neuroscience data acquisition allow for the simultaneous recording of large populations of neurons across multiple brain areas while subjects perform complex cognitive tasks. Interpreting these data requires us to index how task-relevant information is shared across brain regions, but this is often confounded by the mixing of different task parameters at the single neuron level. Here, inspired by a method developed for a single brain area, we introduce a new technique for demixing variables across multiple brain areas, called demixed shared component analysis (dSCA). dSCA decomposes population activity into a few components, such that the shared components capture the maximum amount of shared information across brain regions while also depending on relevant task parameters. This yields interpretable components that express which variables are shared between different brain regions and when this information is shared across time. To illustrate our method, we reanalyze two datasets recorded during decision-making tasks in rodents and macaques. We find that dSCA provides new insights into the shared computation between different brain areas in these datasets, relating to several different aspects of decision formation.
Yu Takagi, Steven W. Kennerley, Laurence T. Hunt
NeurIPS1