Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amanda L. Rebar
dblp:217/9390
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-3164-993XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 50% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Health and well-being technologies › behavior change
sedentary behavior intervention |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Time for Break: Understanding Information Workers' Sedentary Behavior Through a Break Prompting System · CHI 2018 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › workplace technology
workplace sensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Time for Break: Understanding Information Workers' Sedentary Behavior Through a Break Prompting System · CHI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-structured interviews · 0.3field study · 0.3break prompting system · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Time for Break: Understanding Information Workers' Sedentary Behavior Through a Break Prompting SystemabstractExtended periods of uninterrupted sedentary behavior are detrimental to long-term health. While prolonged sitting is prevalent among information workers, it is difficult for them to break prolonged sedentary behavior due to the nature of their work. This work aims to understand information workers' intentions & practices around standing or moving breaks. We developed Time for Break, a break prompting system that enables people to set their desired work duration and prompts them to stand up or move. We conducted an exploratory field study (N = 25) with Time for Break to collect participants' work & break intentions and behaviors for three weeks, followed by semi-structured interviews. We examined rich contexts affecting participants' receptiveness to standing or moving breaks, and identified how their habit strength and self-regulation are related to their break-taking intentions & practices. We discuss design implications for interventions to break up periods of prolonged sedentary behavior in workplaces. Yuhan Luo 0002, Bongshin Lee, Donghee Yvette Wohn, Amanda L. Rebar, David E. Conroy, Eun Kyoung Choe |
CHI | 4 |