Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mike Vanis
dblp:217/9425
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-1463-2378ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
User interface design and tools · 39% Design research and methods · 30% Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 30% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Design research and methods › design probe
cultural probes |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies · CHI 2018 |
User interface design and tools
customization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies · CHI 2018 |
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces › maker culture
open-source hardware |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies · CHI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
open-source distribution · 0.3cultural probe study · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes StudiesabstractTaskCams are simple digital cameras intended to serve as a tool for Cultural Probe studies and made available by the Interaction Research Studio via open-source distribution. In conjunction with an associated website, instructions and videos, they represent a novel strategy for disseminating and facilitating a research methodology. At the same time, they provide a myriad of options for customisation and modification, allowing researchers to adopt and adapt them to their needs. In the first part of this paper, the design team describes the rationale and design of the TaskCams and the tactics developed to make them publicly available. In the second part, the story is taken up by designers from the Everyday Design Studio, who assembled their own TaskCams and customised them extensively for a Cultural Probe study they ran for an ongoing project. Rather than discussing the results of their study, we focus on how their experiences reveal some of the issues both in producing and using open-source products such as these. These suggest the potential of TaskCams to support design-led user studies more generally. Andy Boucher 0002, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Andy Sheen, Mike Vanis, William Odom, Doenja Oogjes, William W. Gaver |
CHI | 5 |