Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mehrdad Oveisi

dblp:22/1767 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-8100-5609ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
chromatin conformation
0.512021
iNucs: inter-nucleosome interactions · Bioinform. 2021
Logic in computer science
belief revision
0.212015
Kernel Contraction and Base Dependence: Redundancy in the Base Resulting in Different Types of Dependence · IJCAI 2015
Logic in computer science › belief revision
kernel contraction
0.212015
Kernel Contraction and Base Dependence: Redundancy in the Base Resulting in Different Types of Dependence · IJCAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief change
0.212014
Belief Change and Base Dependence · KR 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

python · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 iNucs: inter-nucleosome interactions
abstract
MOTIVATION: Deciphering nucleosome-nucleosome interactions is an important step toward mesoscale description of chromatin organization but computational tools to perform such analyses are not publicly available. RESULTS: We developed iNucs, a user-friendly and efficient Python-based bioinformatics tool to compute and visualize nucleosome-resolved interactions using standard pairs format input generated from pairtools. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/Karimi-Lab/inucs/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Mehrdad Oveisi, Manu Shukla, Nogayhan Seymen, Masae Ohno, Yuichi Taniguchi, Sunil Nahata, Remco Loos, Ghulam J. Mufti, Robin C. Allshire, Stefan Dimitrov, Mohammad M. Karimi
Bioinform.1
2017 Kernel Contraction and Base Dependence
abstract
The AGM paradigm of belief change studies the dynamics of belief states in light of new information. Finding, or even approximating, those beliefs that are dependent on or relevant to a change is valuable because, for example, it can narrow the set of beliefs considered during belief change operations. A strong intuition in this area is captured by Gärdenfors’s preservation criterion (GPC), which suggests that formulas independent of a belief change should remain intact. GPC thus allows one to build dependence relations that are linked with belief change. Such dependence relations can in turn be used as a theoretical benchmark against which to evaluate other approximate dependence or relevance relations. Fariñas and Herzig axiomatize a dependence relation with respect to a belief set, and, based on GPC, they characterize the correspondence between AGM contraction functions and dependence relations. In this paper, we introduce base dependence as a relation between formulas with respect to a belief base, and prove a more general characterization that shows the correspondence between kernel contraction and base dependence. At this level of generalization, different types of base dependence emerge, which we show to be a result of possible redundancy in the belief base. We further show that one of these relations that emerge, strong base dependence, is parallel to saturated kernel contraction. We then prove that our latter characterization is a reversible generalization of Fariñas and Herzig’s characterization. That is, in the special case when the underlying belief base is deductively closed (i.e., it is a belief set), strong base dependence reduces to dependence, and so do their respective characterizations. Finally, an intriguing feature of Fariñas and Herzig’s formalism is that it meets other criteria for dependence, namely, Keynes’s conjunction criterion for dependence (CCD) and Gärdenfors’s conjunction criterion for independence (CCI). We prove that our base dependence formalism also meets these criteria. Even more interestingly, we offer a more specific criterion that implies both CCD and CCI, and show our base dependence formalism also meets this new criterion.
Mehrdad Oveisi, James P. Delgrande, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Fred Popowich
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2015 Kernel Contraction and Base Dependence: Redundancy in the Base Resulting in Different Types of Dependence
Mehrdad Oveisi, James P. Delgrande, Fred Popowich, Francis Jeffry Pelletier
IJCAI1
2014 Belief Change and Base Dependence
Mehrdad Oveisi, James P. Delgrande, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Fred Popowich
KR1