Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert D. Brandt

dblp:22/2683 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control
0.011998
An optimal control approach to robust control of robot manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998
Mathematical optimization › control theory
robust control
0.011998
An optimal control approach to robust control of robot manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998
Image and video processing
motion estimation
0.011997
Motion field modeling for video sequences · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997
Image and video processing › motion estimation
motion field modeling
0.011997
Motion field modeling for video sequences · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.011997
Motion field modeling for video sequences · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1997
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
algebraic riccati equation
0.011998
An optimal control approach to robust control of robot manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal control · 0.0algebraic riccati equation · 0.0statistical signal processing · 0.0spatio-temporal modeling · 0.0autoregressive modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Adaptive Interaction and Its Application to Neural Networks
Robert D. Brandt
Inf. Sci.1
1998 An optimal control approach to robust control of robot manipulators
abstract
We present a new optimal control approach to robust control of robot manipulators in the framework of Lin (1997). Due to the unknown load placed on a manipulator and the other uncertainties in the manipulator dynamics, it is important to design a robust control law that will guarantee the performance of the manipulator under these uncertainties. To solve this robust control problem, we first translate the robust control problem into an optimal control problem, where the uncertainties are reflected in the performance index. We then use the optimal control approach to solve the robust control problem. We show that the solution to the optimal control problem is indeed a solution to the robust control problem. We illustrate this approach using a two-joint SCARA type robot, whose robust control is obtained by solving an algebraic Riccati equation.
Robert D. Brandt
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2
1997 Motion field modeling for video sequences
abstract
We propose a model for the interframe correspondences existing between pixels of an image sequence. These correspondences form the elements of a field called the motion field. In our model, spatial neighborhoods of motion elements are related based on a generalization of autoregressive (AR) modeling of the time-series. We also propose a joint spatio-temporal model by including spatial neighborhoods of pixel intensities in the motion model. A fundamental difference of our approach with most previous approaches to modeling motion is in basing our model on concepts from statistical signal processing. The developments in this paper give rise to the promise of extending well-understood tools of signal processing (e.g., filtering) to the analysis and processing of motion fields. Simulation results presented show the performance of our models in interframe prediction; specifically, on average the motion model performs 29% better in terms of the mean squared error energy over a commonly used pel-recursive approach. The spatio-temporal model improves the prediction efficiencies by 8% over the motion model. Our model can also be used to obtain estimates of the optical flow field as the simulations demonstrate.
Rajesh Rajagopalan, Michael T. Orchard, Robert D. Brandt
IEEE Trans. Image Process.3
1996 Representations that uniquely characterize images modulo translation, rotation, and scaling
Robert D. Brandt
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1
1993 Towards absolute invariants of images under translation, rotation, and dilation
Robert D. Brandt
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
1989 The recognition of shapes in binary images using a gradient classifier
abstract
The authors consider a prototype-based binary image classifier that makes comparisons based on blurred representations of the images. The blurring induces a metric on the space of all images that varies continuously under continuous deformation of the image plane. This blurred representation is suitable for direct implementation of a nearest-neighbor classifier. However, it is still desirable to have a representation which is invariant under certain spatial deformations, such as rotation, translation, and scaling of the image plane. A representation which is invariant under these transformation is produced by transforming an input to a local minimum of its distance from each prototype simultaneously. These minima are found by performing a gradient descent on an appropriate error surface over the transformation parameters. The error functional is the L/sub 2/-norm of the difference between the blurred prototype and the blurred input. The resulting classifier makes more efficient use of prototypes than does the nearest-neighbor classifier.>
Robert D. Brandt, Yao Wang 0001, Alan J. Laub, Sanjit K. Mitra
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.1