Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aman Sinha 0001

dblp:22/3606-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Reinforcement learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
rare-event simulation
0.822020
Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems · NeurIPS 2020
Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandit optimization
0.412020
FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.412020
FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.412020
FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness
robust policy
0.412020
FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety-critical systems
0.412020
Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation
0.412020
Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
self-play
0.412020
FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.312018
Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training · ICLR 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributional robustness
0.312018
Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training · ICLR 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312018
Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training · ICLR 2018
Robotics › Autonomous driving
safety validation
0.312018
Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation · NeurIPS 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › monte carlo simulation
importance sampling
0.312018
Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
adaptive sampling
0.312017
Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
coordinate descent
0.312017
Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.312017
Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.312017
Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel learning
0.212016
Learning Kernels with Random Features · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features
0.212016
Learning Kernels with Random Features · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

importance sampling · 0.7monte carlo simulation · 0.7adaptive importance sampling · 0.7risk aversion · 0.4replica-exchange markov chain monte carlo · 0.4neural bridge sampling · 0.4exploration-exploitation · 0.4distributionally robust bandit · 0.4distributionally robust optimization · 0.3adversarial training · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis
abstract
Balancing performance and safety is crucial to deploying autonomous vehicles in multi-agent environments. In particular, autonomous racing is a domain that penalizes safe but conservative policies, highlighting the need for robust, adaptive strategies. Current approaches either make simplifying assumptions about other agents or lack robust mechanisms for online adaptation. This work makes algorithmic contributions to both challenges. First, to generate a realistic, diverse set of opponents, we develop a novel method for self-play based on replica-exchange Markov chain Monte Carlo. Second, we propose a distributionally robust bandit optimization procedure that adaptively adjusts risk aversion relative to uncertainty in beliefs about opponents’ behaviors. We rigorously quantify the tradeoffs in performance and robustness when approximating these computations in real-time motion-planning, and we demonstrate our methods experimentally on autonomous vehicles that achieve scaled speeds comparable to Formula One racecars.
Aman Sinha 0001, Matthew O'Kelly, Hongrui Zheng, Rahul Mangharam, John C. Duchi, Russ Tedrake
ICML1
2020 Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems
abstract
Learning-based methodologies increasingly find applications in safety-critical domains like autonomous driving and medical robotics. Due to the rare nature of dangerous events, real-world testing is prohibitively expensive and unscalable. In this work, we employ a probabilistic approach to safety evaluation in simulation, where we are concerned with computing the probability of dangerous events. We develop a novel rare-event simulation method that combines exploration, exploitation, and optimization techniques to find failure modes and estimate their rate of occurrence. We provide rigorous guarantees for the performance of our method in terms of both statistical and computational efficiency. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on a variety of scenarios, illustrating its usefulness as a tool for rapid sensitivity analysis and model comparison that are essential to developing and testing safety-critical autonomous systems.
Aman Sinha 0001, Matthew O'Kelly, Russ Tedrake, John C. Duchi
NeurIPS1
2018 Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training
Aman Sinha 0001, Hongseok Namkoong, John C. Duchi
ICLR1
2018 Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation
abstract
While recent developments in autonomous vehicle (AV) technology highlight substantial progress, we lack tools for rigorous and scalable testing. Real-world testing, the de facto evaluation environment, places the public in danger, and, due to the rare nature of accidents, will require billions of miles in order to statistically validate performance claims. We implement a simulation framework that can test an entire modern autonomous driving system, including, in particular, systems that employ deep-learning perception and control algorithms. Using adaptive importance-sampling methods to accelerate rare-event probability evaluation, we estimate the probability of an accident under a base distribution governing standard traffic behavior. We demonstrate our framework on a highway scenario, accelerating system evaluation by 2-20 times over naive Monte Carlo sampling methods and 10-300P times (where P is the number of processors) over real-world testing.
Matthew O'Kelly, Aman Sinha 0001, Hongseok Namkoong, Russ Tedrake, John C. Duchi
NeurIPS2
2017 Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization
abstract
Standard forms of coordinate and stochastic gradient methods do not adapt to structure in data; their good behavior under random sampling is predicated on uniformity in data. When gradients in certain blocks of features (for coordinate descent) or examples (for SGD) are larger than others, there is a natural structure that can be exploited for quicker convergence. Yet adaptive variants often suffer nontrivial computational overhead. We present a framework that discovers and leverages such structural properties at a low computational cost. We employ a bandit optimization procedure that “learns” probabilities for sampling coordinates or examples in (non-smooth) optimization problems, allowing us to guarantee performance close to that of the optimal stationary sampling distribution. When such structures exist, our algorithms achieve tighter convergence guarantees than their non-adaptive counterparts, and we complement our analysis with experiments on several datasets.
Hongseok Namkoong, Aman Sinha 0001, Steve Yadlowsky, John C. Duchi
ICML2
2016 Learning Kernels with Random Features
abstract
Randomized features provide a computationally efficient way to approximate kernel machines in machine learning tasks. However, such methods require a user-defined kernel as input. We extend the randomized-feature approach to the task of learning a kernel (via its associated random features). Specifically, we present an efficient optimization problem that learns a kernel in a supervised manner. We prove the consistency of the estimated kernel as well as generalization bounds for the class of estimators induced by the optimized kernel, and we experimentally evaluate our technique on several datasets. Our approach is efficient and highly scalable, and we attain competitive results with a fraction of the training cost of other techniques.
Aman Sinha 0001, John C. Duchi
NIPS1