Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aman Sinha 0001
dblp:22/3606-1
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Reinforcement learning · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
rare-event simulation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems · NeurIPS 2020 Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandit optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness
robust policy |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety-critical systems |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
self-play |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population Synthesis · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training · ICLR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributional robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training · ICLR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training · ICLR 2018 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
safety validation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation · NeurIPS 2018 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › monte carlo simulation
importance sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulation · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
coordinate descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning Kernels with Random Features · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning Kernels with Random Features · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
importance sampling · 0.7monte carlo simulation · 0.7adaptive importance sampling · 0.7risk aversion · 0.4replica-exchange markov chain monte carlo · 0.4neural bridge sampling · 0.4exploration-exploitation · 0.4distributionally robust bandit · 0.4distributionally robust optimization · 0.3adversarial training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | FormulaZero: Distributionally Robust Online Adaptation via Offline Population SynthesisabstractBalancing performance and safety is crucial to deploying autonomous vehicles in multi-agent environments. In particular, autonomous racing is a domain that penalizes safe but conservative policies, highlighting the need for robust, adaptive strategies. Current approaches either make simplifying assumptions about other agents or lack robust mechanisms for online adaptation. This work makes algorithmic contributions to both challenges. First, to generate a realistic, diverse set of opponents, we develop a novel method for self-play based on replica-exchange Markov chain Monte Carlo. Second, we propose a distributionally robust bandit optimization procedure that adaptively adjusts risk aversion relative to uncertainty in beliefs about opponents’ behaviors. We rigorously quantify the tradeoffs in performance and robustness when approximating these computations in real-time motion-planning, and we demonstrate our methods experimentally on autonomous vehicles that achieve scaled speeds comparable to Formula One racecars. Aman Sinha 0001, Matthew O'Kelly, Hongrui Zheng, Rahul Mangharam, John C. Duchi, Russ Tedrake |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous SystemsabstractLearning-based methodologies increasingly find applications in safety-critical domains like autonomous driving and medical robotics. Due to the rare nature of dangerous events, real-world testing is prohibitively expensive and unscalable. In this work, we employ a probabilistic approach to safety evaluation in simulation, where we are concerned with computing the probability of dangerous events. We develop a novel rare-event simulation method that combines exploration, exploitation, and optimization techniques to find failure modes and estimate their rate of occurrence. We provide rigorous guarantees for the performance of our method in terms of both statistical and computational efficiency. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on a variety of scenarios, illustrating its usefulness as a tool for rapid sensitivity analysis and model comparison that are essential to developing and testing safety-critical autonomous systems. Aman Sinha 0001, Matthew O'Kelly, Russ Tedrake, John C. Duchi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training
Aman Sinha 0001, Hongseok Namkoong, John C. Duchi |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2018 | Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event SimulationabstractWhile recent developments in autonomous vehicle (AV) technology highlight substantial progress, we lack tools for rigorous and scalable testing. Real-world testing, the de facto evaluation environment, places the public in danger, and, due to the rare nature of accidents, will require billions of miles in order to statistically validate performance claims. We implement a simulation framework that can test an entire modern autonomous driving system, including, in particular, systems that employ deep-learning perception and control algorithms. Using adaptive importance-sampling methods to accelerate rare-event probability evaluation, we estimate the probability of an accident under a base distribution governing standard traffic behavior. We demonstrate our framework on a highway scenario, accelerating system evaluation by 2-20 times over naive Monte Carlo sampling methods and 10-300P times (where P is the number of processors) over real-world testing. Matthew O'Kelly, Aman Sinha 0001, Hongseok Namkoong, Russ Tedrake, John C. Duchi |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Adaptive Sampling Probabilities for Non-Smooth OptimizationabstractStandard forms of coordinate and stochastic gradient methods do not adapt to structure in data; their good behavior under random sampling is predicated on uniformity in data. When gradients in certain blocks of features (for coordinate descent) or examples (for SGD) are larger than others, there is a natural structure that can be exploited for quicker convergence. Yet adaptive variants often suffer nontrivial computational overhead. We present a framework that discovers and leverages such structural properties at a low computational cost. We employ a bandit optimization procedure that “learns” probabilities for sampling coordinates or examples in (non-smooth) optimization problems, allowing us to guarantee performance close to that of the optimal stationary sampling distribution. When such structures exist, our algorithms achieve tighter convergence guarantees than their non-adaptive counterparts, and we complement our analysis with experiments on several datasets. Hongseok Namkoong, Aman Sinha 0001, Steve Yadlowsky, John C. Duchi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | Learning Kernels with Random FeaturesabstractRandomized features provide a computationally efficient way to approximate kernel machines in machine learning tasks. However, such methods require a user-defined kernel as input. We extend the randomized-feature approach to the task of learning a kernel (via its associated random features). Specifically, we present an efficient optimization problem that learns a kernel in a supervised manner. We prove the consistency of the estimated kernel as well as generalization bounds for the class of estimators induced by the optimized kernel, and we experimentally evaluate our technique on several datasets. Our approach is efficient and highly scalable, and we attain competitive results with a fraction of the training cost of other techniques. Aman Sinha 0001, John C. Duchi |
NIPS | 1 |