Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Siegel

dblp:22/3979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2573-9616ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Logic in computer science · 70% Automated reasoning and model checking · 30%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification › assertion-based verification
assertion failure debugging
0.112009
Untwist your brain: efficient debugging and diagnosis of complex assertions · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.112009
Untwist your brain: efficient debugging and diagnosis of complex assertions · DAC 2009
Logic in computer science
finite model theory
0.012002
The Small Model Property: How Small Can It Be? · Inf. Comput. 2002
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability modulo theories
equality logic
0.011999
Deciding Equality Formulas by Small Domains Instantiations · CAV 1999
Compilers and program optimization › verified compilation
translation validation
0.011998
Translation Validation for Synchronous Languages · ICALP 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

root cause analysis · 0.1automated debugging · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Revolutionizing Board Cyber-Risk Management Using Collaborative Gaming
Tony Delvecchio, Sander Zeijlemaker, Giancarlo De Bernardis, Michael Siegel
ICISSP4
2012 Cyber Politics: Understanding the Use of Social Media for Dissident Movements in an Integrated State Stability Framework
abstract
Recent events in North Africa and the Gulf States have highlighted both the fragility of states worldwide and the ability of coordinated dissidents to challenge or topple regimes. The common processes of 'loads' generated by dissident activities and the core features of state resilience and its 'capacity' to withstand these 'loads' have been explored in the traditional "real world" view. More recently, however, there has been increased attention to the "cyber world" -- the role of cyber technologies in coordinating and amplifying dissident messages, as well as in aiding regimes in suppressing anti-regime dissidents. As of yet, these two views (real and cyber) have not been integrated into a common framework that seeks to explain overall changes in regime stability over time. Further, emerging uses of social media technologies, such as Twitter have not fully been examined within an overall framework of state stability that represents the nature and dynamics of 'loads' generated by dissident activities in the real (i.e. protests) and cyber (i.e. planning and coordination via cyber venues) domains.
Daniel Goldsmith, Michael Siegel
ASONAM2
2010 Achieving earlier verification closure using advanced formal verification
Michael Siegel
FMCAD1
2009 Untwist your brain: efficient debugging and diagnosis of complex assertions
abstract
Assertions are recognized in the industry to be a major improvement in functional RTL verification flows. Today's standard assertion languages, such as SVA [1] and PSL [2], are very expressive, capable of describing sophisticated temporal design behavior at different abstraction levels. Nevertheless, most assertion users stick to writing simple assertions because of the intricacy and effort required to debug complex assertions -- one of the major bottlenecks in assertion based verification. We present debugging and diagnosis techniques that automatically identify those parts of an assertion that cause the assertion to fail for a given design and that provide additional automation to efficiently identify the root cause of the failure. These techniques enable major effort savings when working with complex assertions, allowing engineers to use the full capabilities of assertion languages. This enables further productivity and quality improvements in functional verification by lifting mainstream assertion usage to higher abstraction levels such as efficient capture and verification of high-level design features, operations, and transactions. Advanced debugging automation is key for this progress - solving a problem that many designers and verification engineers face in their daily work.
Michael Siegel, Adriana Maggiore, Christian Pichler
DAC1
2003 Erratum ("The small model property: how small can it be?" Volume 178, Number 1 [2002], pages 279-293)
Amir Pnueli, Yoav Rodeh, Ofer Strichman, Michael Siegel
Inf. Comput.4
2002 The Small Model Property: How Small Can It Be?
Amir Pnueli, Yoav Rodeh, Ofer Strichman, Michael Siegel
Inf. Comput.4
1999 Deciding Equality Formulas by Small Domains Instantiations
Amir Pnueli, Yoav Rodeh, Ofer Strichman, Michael Siegel
CAV4
1998 Translation Validation for Synchronous Languages
Amir Pnueli, Ofer Strichman, Michael Siegel
ICALP3
1998 Translation Validation
Amir Pnueli, Michael Siegel, Eli Singerman
TACAS2
1998 The Code Validation Tool CVT: Automatic Verification of a Compilation Process
Amir Pnueli, Ofer Strichman, Michael Siegel
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.3
1995 A Refinement Theory that Supports both 'Decrease of Nondeterminism' and 'Increase of Parallelism'
Michael Siegel
CONCUR1
1994 Extending the Limits of Sequentially Phased Reasoning
Michael Siegel, Frank A. Stomp
FSTTCS1