Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abdul Naeem

dblp:22/9256 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 70% Embedded and real-time systems · 23% Performance modeling and evaluation · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems › shared memory
distributed shared memory
0.212013
Scalability Analysis of Memory Consistency Models in NoC-Based Distributed Shared Memory SoCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Memory systems › memory consistency
memory consistency model
0.212013
Scalability Analysis of Memory Consistency Models in NoC-Based Distributed Shared Memory SoCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded hardware platform › MPSoC
multicore system-on-chip
0.212013
Scalability Analysis of Memory Consistency Models in NoC-Based Distributed Shared Memory SoCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013
Memory systems › memory consistency › memory consistency model
weak memory model
0.212013
Scalability Analysis of Memory Consistency Models in NoC-Based Distributed Shared Memory SoCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transaction counter · 0.2deflection routing · 0.2address-stack-based realization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Scalability Analysis of Memory Consistency Models in NoC-Based Distributed Shared Memory SoCs
abstract
We analyze the scalability of six memory consistency models in network-on-chip (NoC)-based distributed shared memory multicore systems: 1) protected release consistency (PRC); 2) release consistency (RC); 3) weak consistency (WC); 4) partial store ordering (PSO); 5) total store ordering (TSO); and 6) sequential consistency (SC). Their realizations are based on a transaction counter and an address-stack-based approach. The scalability analysis is based on different workloads mapped on various sizes of networks using different problem sizes. For the experiments, we use Nostrum NoC-based configurable multicore platform with a 2-D mesh topology and a deflection routing algorithm. Under the synthetic workloads, the average execution time for the PRC, RC, WC, PSO, and TSO models in the 8 × 8 network (64-cores) is reduced by 32.3%, 28.3%, 20.1%, 13.8%, and 9.9% over the SC model, respectively. For the application workloads, as the network size grows, the average execution time under these relaxed memory models decreases with respect to the SC model depending on the application and its match to the architecture. The performance improvement of the PRC and RC models over the SC model tends to be higher than 50% as observed in the experiments, when the system is further scaled up. The area cost in the network interface for the relaxed memory models is increased by less than 4% over the SC model.
Abdul Naeem, Axel Jantsch, Zhonghai Lu
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
2012 Architecture Support and Comparison of Three Memory Consistency Models in NoC Based Systems
abstract
We propose a novel hardware support for three relaxed memory models, Release Consistency (RC), Partial Store Ordering (PSO) and Total Store Ordering (TSO) in Network-on-Chip (NoC) based distributed shared memory multicore systems. The RC model is realized by using a Transaction Counter and an Address Stack based approach to enforce the required global orders on the shared memory operations. The PSO and TSO models are realized by using a Write Transaction Counter and a Write Address Stack based approach to enforce the required global orders on the shared memory operations. In the experiments, we use a configurable platform based on a 2D mesh NoC using deflection routing policy. The results show that under synthetic workloads, the average execution time for the RC, PSO and TSO models in 8×8 network (64 cores) is reduced by 35.8%, 22.7% and 16.5% over the sequential consistency (SC) model, respectively. The average speedup for the RC, PSO and TSO models in 8×8 network under different application workloads is increased by 34.3%, 10.6% and 8.9% over the SC model, respectively. The area cost for the TSO, PSO and RC models is increased by less than 2% over the SC model at the interface to the processor.
Abdul Naeem, Axel Jantsch, Zhonghai Lu
DSD1
2011 Realization and performance comparison of sequential and weak memory consistency models in network-on-chip based multi-core systems
abstract
This paper studies realization and performance comparison of the sequential and weak consistency models in the network-on-chip (NoC) based distributed shared memory (DSM) multi-core systems. Memory consistency constrains the order of shared memory operations for the expected behavior of the multi-core systems. Both the consistency models are realized in the NoC based multi-core systems. The performance of the two consistency models are compared for various sizes of networks using regular mesh topologies and deflection routing algorithm. The results show that the weak consistency improves the performance by 46.17% and 33.76% on average in the code and consistency latencies over the sequential consistency model, due to relaxation in the program order, as the system grows from single core to 64 cores.
Abdul Naeem, Zhonghai Lu, Axel Jantsch
ASP-DAC1
2011 Realization and Scalability of Release and Protected Release Consistency Models in NoC Based Systems
abstract
This paper studies the realization and scalability of release and protected release consistency models in Network-on-Chip (NoC) based Distributed Shared Memory (DSM) multi-core systems. The protected release consistency (PRC) model is proposed as an extension of the release consistency (RC) model and provides further relaxation in the shared memory operations. The realization schemes of RC and PRC models use a transaction counter in each node of the NoC based multi-core (McNoC) systems. Further, we study the scalability of these RC and PRC models and evaluate their performance in the McNoC platform. A configurable NoC based platform with 2D mesh topology and deflection routing algorithm is used in the tests. We experiment both with synthetic and application workloads. The performance of the RC and PRC models are compared using sequential consistency (SC) as the baseline. The experiments show that the average code execution time for the PRC model in 8x8 network (64 cores) is reduced by 30.5% over SC, and by 6.5% over RC model. Average data execution time in the 8x8 network for the PRC model is reduced by almost 37% over SC and by 8.8% over RC. The increase in area for the PRC of RC is about 880 gates in the network interface ( 1.7% ).
Abdul Naeem, Axel Jantsch, Zhonghai Lu
DSD1
2010 Scalability of weak consistency in NoC based multicore architectures
abstract
In Multicore Network-on-Chip, it is preferable to realize distributed but shared memory (DSM) in order to reuse the huge amount of legacy code and easy programming. Within DSM systems, memory consistency is a critical issue since it affects not only performance but also the correctness of programs. In this paper, we investigate the scalability of the weak consistency model, which may be implemented using a transaction counter. The experimental results compare synchronization latencies for various network sizes, topologies and lock positions in the network. Average synchronization latency rises exponentially for mesh and torus topologies as the network size grows. However, torus improves the synchronization latency in comparison to mesh. For mesh topology network average synchronization latency is also slightly affected by the lock position with respect to the network center.
Abdul Naeem, Zhonghai Lu, Axel Jantsch
ISCAS1