Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Bartusek
dblp:220/2734
· DBLP profile ↗
32ranked-venue papers
29as first author
25since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-9020-3589ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 27 · 24 first-author · 21 since 2021Theory of computation · 10 · 9 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
21 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 67% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 25% Digital forensics and information hiding · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
7 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 85% Information theory · 15% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 35, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure distributed storage
certified deletion |
2.2 | 3 | 2024 | Software with Certified Deletion · EUROCRYPT (4) 2024 Secret Sharing with Certified Deletion · CRYPTO (7) 2024 Cryptography with Certified Deletion · CRYPTO (5) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › public verifiability
publicly verifiable deletion |
1.9 | 3 | 2026 | Publicly Verifiable Deletion: General Compilers from Minimal Assumptions · J. Cryptol. 2026 Publicly-Verifiable Deletion via Target-Collapsing Functions · CRYPTO (5) 2023 Software with Certified Deletion · EUROCRYPT (4) 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | A New Framework for Quantum Oblivious Transfer · EUROCRYPT (1) 2023 One-Way Functions Imply Secure Computation in a Quantum World · CRYPTO (1) 2021 On the Round Complexity of Secure Quantum Computation · CRYPTO (1) 2021 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
quantum cryptography |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Quantum State Obfuscation from Classical Oracles · STOC 2024 Obfuscation of Pseudo-Deterministic Quantum Circuits · STOC 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | On the Communication Complexity of Secure Multi-Party Computation With Aborts · PODC 2024 Post-Quantum Multi-Party Computation · EUROCRYPT (1) 2021 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
succinct arguments |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMA · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum Computation · CRYPTO (2) 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
private set intersection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Laconic PSI on Authenticated Inputs and Applications · ASIACRYPT (5) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
communication complexity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Communication Complexity of Secure Multi-Party Computation With Aborts · PODC 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital rights management
copy-protection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quantum State Obfuscation from Classical Oracles · STOC 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secret sharing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Secret Sharing with Certified Deletion · CRYPTO (7) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
oblivious transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A New Framework for Quantum Oblivious Transfer · EUROCRYPT (1) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › oblivious transfer
quantum oblivious transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A New Framework for Quantum Oblivious Transfer · EUROCRYPT (1) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure messaging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Secure Messaging with Traceability Only for Illegal Content · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
traceability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Secure Messaging with Traceability Only for Illegal Content · EUROCRYPT (5) 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › obfuscation
virtual black-box obfuscation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Obfuscation of Pseudo-Deterministic Quantum Circuits · STOC 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Secure Computation with Shared EPR Pairs (Or: How to Teleport in Zero-Knowledge) · CRYPTO (5) 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
quantum verification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum Computation · CRYPTO (2) 2022 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Post-Quantum Multi-Party Computation · EUROCRYPT (1) 2021 |
Information theory › cryptography
secure computation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | One-Way Functions Imply Secure Computation in a Quantum World · CRYPTO (1) 2021 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › obfuscation
conjunction obfuscation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | New Techniques for Obfuscating Conjunctions · EUROCRYPT (3) 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
functional encryption |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Public-Key Function-Private Hidden Vector Encryption (and More) · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving computation
function privacy |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Public-Key Function-Private Hidden Vector Encryption (and More) · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › functional encryption
hidden vector encryption |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Public-Key Function-Private Hidden Vector Encryption (and More) · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
obfuscation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | New Techniques for Obfuscating Conjunctions · EUROCRYPT (3) 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Public-Key Function-Private Hidden Vector Encryption (and More) · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QMA |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMA · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMA · EUROCRYPT (7) 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-enhancing technologies
data deletion |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Software with Certified Deletion · EUROCRYPT (4) 2024 |
Distributed systems › consensus
byzantine agreement |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Communication Complexity of Secure Multi-Party Computation With Aborts · PODC 2024 |
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Communication Complexity of Secure Multi-Party Computation With Aborts · PODC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactive oracle proofs · 2.0oblivious state preparation · 1.7certified deletion · 1.3secret sharing · 0.8quantum authentication · 0.8indistinguishability obfuscation · 0.8encryption · 0.8ZX measurements · 0.8quantum protocols · 0.7quantum hardness assumptions · 0.7learning with errors · 0.7succinct arguments · 0.6quantum security · 0.5quantum computation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Fair-Weather No More: Guaranteed Efficiency in Secure Group Messaging
James Bartusek, Nir Bitansky, Yevgeniy Dodis, Rachit Garg 0001, David J. Wu 0001 |
CRYPTO (10) | 1 |
| 2026 | Unclonable Encryption in the Haar Random Oracle Model
James Bartusek, Eli Goldin |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2026 | A New Approach to Arguments of Quantum Knowledge
James Bartusek, Ruta Jawale, Justin Raizes, Kabir Tomer |
CRYPTO (9) | 1 |
| 2026 | A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMA
James Bartusek, Giulio Malavolta |
EUROCRYPT (7) | 1 |
| 2026 | Publicly Verifiable Deletion: General Compilers from Minimal Assumptions
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Giulio Malavolta, Ryo Nishimaki, Alexander Poremba, Michael Walter 0005, Takashi Yamakawa |
J. Cryptol. | 1 |
| 2025 | Laconic PSI on Authenticated Inputs and Applications
James Bartusek, Sanjam Garg, Abhishek Jain 0002, Guru-Vamsi Policharla |
ASIACRYPT (5) | 1 |
| 2025 | On the Power of Oblivious State Preparation
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana |
CRYPTO (2) | 1 |
| 2024 | Secret Sharing with Certified Deletion
James Bartusek, Justin Raizes |
CRYPTO (7) | 1 |
| 2024 | Software with Certified Deletion
James Bartusek, Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana, Giulio Malavolta, Justin Raizes, Bhaskar Roberts |
EUROCRYPT (4) | 1 |
| 2024 | On the Communication Complexity of Secure Multi-Party Computation With AbortsabstractA central goal of cryptography is Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC), where n parties desire to compute a function of their joint inputs without letting any party learn about the inputs of its peers. Unfortunately, it is well-known that MPC guaranteeing output delivery to every party is infeasible when a majority of the parties are malicious. In fact, parties operating over a point-to-point network (i.e., without access to a broadcast channel) cannot even reach an agreement on the output when more than one third of the parties are malicious (Lamport, Shostak, and Pease, JACM 1980). James Bartusek, Thiago Bergamaschi, Seri Khoury, Saachi Mutreja, Orr Paradise |
PODC | 1 |
| 2024 | Quantum State Obfuscation from Classical OraclesabstractA major unresolved question in quantum cryptography is whether it is possible to obfuscate arbitrary quantum computation. Indeed, there is much yet to understand about the feasibility of quantum obfuscation even in the classical oracle model, where one is given for free the ability to obfuscate any classical circuit. In this work, we develop a new array of techniques that we use to construct a quantum state obfuscator, a powerful notion formalized recently by Coladangelo and Gunn (arXiv:2311.07794) in their pursuit of better software copy-protection schemes. Quantum state obfuscation refers to the task of compiling a quantum program, consisting of a quantum circuit C with a classical description and an auxiliary quantum state ψ, into a functionally-equivalent obfuscated quantum program that hides as much as possible about C and ψ. We prove the security of our obfuscator when applied to any pseudo-deterministic quantum program, i.e. one that computes a (nearly) deterministic classical input / classical output functionality. Our security proof is with respect to an efficient classical oracle, which may be heuristically instantiated using quantum-secure indistinguishability obfuscation for classical circuits. Our result improves upon the recent work of Bartusek, Kitagawa, Nishimaki and Yamakawa (STOC 2023) who also showed how to obfuscate pseudo-deterministic quantum circuits in the classical oracle model, but only ones with a completely classical description. Furthermore, our result answers a question of Coladangelo and Gunn, who provide a construction of quantum state indistinguishability obfuscation with respect to a quantum oracle, but leave the existence of a concrete real-world candidate as an open problem. Indeed, our quantum state obfuscator together with Coladangelo-Gunn gives the first candidate realization of a “best-possible” copy-protection scheme for all polynomial-time functionalities. Our techniques deviate significantly from previous works on quantum obfuscation. We develop several novel technical tools which we expect to be broadly useful in quantum cryptography. These tools include a publicly-verifiable, linearly-homomorphic quantum authentication scheme with classically-decodable ZX measurements (which we build from coset states), and a method for compiling any quantum circuit into a ”linear + measurement” () quantum program: an alternating sequence of CNOT operations and partial ZX measurements. James Bartusek, Zvika Brakerski, Vinod Vaikuntanathan |
STOC | 1 |
| 2023 | Cryptography with Certified Deletion
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2023 | Publicly-Verifiable Deletion via Target-Collapsing Functions
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Alexander Poremba |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2023 | Secure Computation with Shared EPR Pairs (Or: How to Teleport in Zero-Knowledge)
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Akshayaram Srinivasan |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2023 | A New Framework for Quantum Oblivious Transfer
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Nishant Kumar 0001 |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | End-to-End Secure Messaging with Traceability Only for Illegal Content
James Bartusek, Sanjam Garg, Abhishek Jain 0002, Guru-Vamsi Policharla |
EUROCRYPT (5) | 1 |
| 2023 | Obfuscation of Pseudo-Deterministic Quantum CircuitsabstractWe show how to obfuscate pseudo-deterministic quantum circuits, assuming the quantum hardness of learning with errors (QLWE) and post-quantum virtual black-box (VBB) obfuscation for classical circuits. Given the classical description of a quantum circuit Q, our obfuscator outputs a quantum state Q that can be used to evaluate Q repeatedly on arbitrary inputs. James Bartusek, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi Yamakawa |
STOC | 1 |
| 2023 | Weakening Assumptions for Publicly-Verifiable Deletion
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Giulio Malavolta, Alexander Poremba, Michael Walter 0005 |
TCC (4) | 1 |
| 2022 | Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum Computation
James Bartusek, Yael Tauman Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, Giulio Malavolta, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Thomas Vidick, Lisa Yang 0001 |
CRYPTO (2) | 1 |
| 2022 | Indistinguishability Obfuscation of Null Quantum Circuits and ApplicationsabstractWe study the notion of indistinguishability obfuscation for null quantum circuits (quantum null-iO). We present a construction assuming: - The quantum hardness of learning with errors (LWE). - Post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation for classical circuits. - A notion of "dual-mode" classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC). We give evidence that our notion of dual-mode CVQC exists by proposing a scheme that is secure assuming LWE in the quantum random oracle model (QROM). Then we show how quantum null-iO enables a series of new cryptographic primitives that, prior to our work, were unknown to exist even making heuristic assumptions. Among others, we obtain the first witness encryption scheme for QMA, the first publicly verifiable non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) scheme for QMA, and the first attribute-based encryption (ABE) scheme for BQP. James Bartusek, Giulio Malavolta |
ITCS | 1 |
| 2021 | On the Round Complexity of Secure Quantum Computation
James Bartusek, Andrea Coladangelo, Dakshita Khurana, Fermi Ma |
CRYPTO (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | One-Way Functions Imply Secure Computation in a Quantum World
James Bartusek, Andrea Coladangelo, Dakshita Khurana, Fermi Ma |
CRYPTO (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Post-Quantum Multi-Party Computation
James Bartusek, Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana, Giulio Malavolta |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | Two-Round Maliciously Secure Computation with Super-Polynomial Simulation
James Bartusek, Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana, Giulio Malavolta |
TCC (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | Secure Quantum Computation with Classical Communication
James Bartusek |
TCC (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Affine Determinant Programs: A Framework for Obfuscation and Witness EncryptionabstractAn affine determinant program ADP: {0,1}^n → {0,1} is specified by a tuple (A,B_1,…,B_n) of square matrices over ?_q and a function Eval: ?_q → {0,1}, and evaluated on x ∈ {0,1}^n by computing Eval(det(A + ∑_{i∈[n]} x_i B_i)). In this work, we suggest ADPs as a new framework for building general-purpose obfuscation and witness encryption. We provide evidence to suggest that constructions following our ADP-based framework may one day yield secure, practically feasible obfuscation. As a proof-of-concept, we give a candidate ADP-based construction of indistinguishability obfuscation (i?) for all circuits along with a simple witness encryption candidate. We provide cryptanalysis demonstrating that our schemes resist several potential attacks, and leave further cryptanalysis to future work. Lastly, we explore practically feasible applications of our witness encryption candidate, such as public-key encryption with near-optimal key generation. James Bartusek, Yuval Ishai, Aayush Jain, Fermi Ma, Amit Sahai, Mark Zhandry |
ITCS | 1 |
| 2020 | Reusable Two-Round MPC from DDH
James Bartusek, Sanjam Garg, Daniel Masny, Pratyay Mukherjee |
TCC (2) | 1 |
| 2019 | Public-Key Function-Private Hidden Vector Encryption (and More)
James Bartusek, Brent Carmer, Abhishek Jain 0002, Zhengzhong Jin, Tancrède Lepoint, Fermi Ma, Tal Malkin, Alex J. Malozemoff, Mariana Raykova 0001 |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 1 |
| 2019 | The Distinction Between Fixed and Random Generators in Group-Based Assumptions
James Bartusek, Fermi Ma, Mark Zhandry |
CRYPTO (2) | 1 |
| 2019 | New Techniques for Obfuscating Conjunctions
James Bartusek, Tancrède Lepoint, Fermi Ma, Mark Zhandry |
EUROCRYPT (3) | 1 |
| 2019 | On the (In)security of Kilian-Based SNARGs
James Bartusek, Liron Bronfman, Justin Holmgren, Fermi Ma, Ron Rothblum |
TCC (2) | 1 |
| 2018 | Return of GGH15: Provable Security Against Zeroizing Attacks
James Bartusek, Jiaxin Guan, Fermi Ma, Mark Zhandry |
TCC (2) | 1 |