Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zecong Hu

dblp:220/3175 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-9163-8530ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
knowledge-grounded language model
0.412020
Latent Relation Language Models · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.312018
Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing · ACL (1) 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › attention network
pointer network
0.312018
Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing · ACL (1) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

latent relation language models · 0.9stack-pointer networks · 0.3depth-first search · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Latent Relation Language Models
abstract
In this paper, we propose Latent Relation Language Models (LRLMs), a class of language models that parameterizes the joint distribution over the words in a document and the entities that occur therein via knowledge graph relations. This model has a number of attractive properties: it not only improves language modeling performance, but is also able to annotate the posterior probability of entity spans for a given text through relations. Experiments demonstrate empirical improvements over both word-based language models and a previous approach that incorporates knowledge graph information. Qualitative analysis further demonstrates the proposed model's ability to learn to predict appropriate relations in context. 1
Hiroaki Hayashi, Zecong Hu, Chenyan Xiong, Graham Neubig
AAAI2
2018 Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsing
abstract
We introduce a novel architecture for dependency parsing: stack-pointer networks (STACKPTR).Combining pointer networks (Vinyals et al., 2015) with an internal stack, the proposed model first reads and encodes the whole sentence, then builds the dependency tree top-down (from root-to-leaf) in a depth-first fashion.The stack tracks the status of the depthfirst search and the pointer networks select one child for the word at the top of the stack at each step.The STACKPTR parser benefits from the information of the whole sentence and all previously derived subtree structures, and removes the leftto-right restriction in classical transitionbased parsers.Yet, the number of steps for building any (including non-projective) parse tree is linear in the length of the sentence just as other transition-based parsers, yielding an efficient decoding algorithm with O(n 2 ) time complexity.We evaluate our model on 29 treebanks spanning 20 languages and different dependency annotation schemas, and achieve state-of-theart performance on 21 of them.
Xuezhe Ma, Zecong Hu, Jingzhou Liu, Nanyun Peng 0001, Graham Neubig, Eduard H. Hovy
ACL (1)2