Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonas Helsen
dblp:220/5377
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7218-2585ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 88% Information theory · 12% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state testing
stabilizer state testing |
2.7 | 3 | 2026 | Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower Bounds · STOC 2026 Single-Copy Stabilizer Testing · STOC 2025 Tolerant Testing of Stabilizer States with a Polynomial Gap via a Generalized Uncertainty Relation · STOC 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum property testing |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower Bounds · STOC 2026 Single-Copy Stabilizer Testing · STOC 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tolerant Testing of Stabilizer States with a Polynomial Gap via a Generalized Uncertainty Relation · STOC 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Single-Copy Stabilizer Testing · STOC 2025 |
Information theory › signal processing › time-frequency analysis
uncertainty principle |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tolerant Testing of Stabilizer States with a Polynomial Gap via a Generalized Uncertainty Relation · STOC 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gowers uniformity norms · 1.0commutant analysis · 1.0sample complexity · 0.9positive partial transpose · 0.9lovász theta function · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Clifford Testing: Algorithms and Lower BoundsabstractWe consider the problem of Clifford testing, which asks whether a black-box n-qubit unitary is a Clifford unitary or at least ε-far from every Clifford unitary. We give the first 4-query Clifford tester, which decides this problem with probability poly(ε). This contrasts with the minimum of 6 copies required for the closely-related task of stabilizer testing. We show that our tester is tolerant, by adapting techniques from tolerant stabilizer testing to our setting. In doing so, we settle in the positive a conjecture of Bu, Gu and Jaffe, by proving a polynomial inverse theorem for a non-commutative Gowers 3-uniformity norm. We also consider the restricted setting of single-copy access, where we give an O(n)-query Clifford tester that requires no auxiliary memory qubits or adaptivity. We complement this with a lower bound, proving that any such, potentially adaptive, single-copy algorithm needs at least Ω(n1/4) queries. To obtain our results, we leverage the structure of the commutant of the Clifford group, obtaining several technical statements that may be of independent interest. Marcel Hinsche, Zongbo Bao, Philippe van Dordrecht, Jens Eisert, Jop Briët, Jonas Helsen |
STOC | 6 |
| 2025 | Tolerant Testing of Stabilizer States with a Polynomial Gap via a Generalized Uncertainty RelationabstractWe prove a conjecture of Arunachalam & Dutt on the existence of a tolerant stabilizer testing algorithm, and achieve an exponential improvement in the parameters of the tester. Key to our argument is a generalized uncertainty relation for sets of Pauli operators, based on the Lovász theta function. Zongbo Bao, Philippe van Dordrecht, Jonas Helsen |
STOC | 3 |
| 2025 | Single-Copy Stabilizer TestingabstractWe consider the problem of testing whether an unknown $n$-qubit quantum state $|ψ\rangle$ is a stabilizer state, with only single-copy access. We give an algorithm solving this problem using $O(n)$ copies, and conversely prove that $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ copies are required for any algorithm. The main observation behind our algorithm is that when repeatedly measuring in a randomly chosen stabilizer basis, stabilizer states are the most likely among the set of all pure states to exhibit linear dependencies in measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is designed to probe deviations from this extremal behavior. For the lower bound, we first reduce stabilizer testing to the task of distinguishing random stabilizer states from the maximally mixed state. We then argue that, without loss of generality, it is sufficient to consider measurement strategies that a) lie in the commutant of the tensor action of the Clifford group and b) satisfy a Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) condition. By leveraging these constraints, together with novel results on the partial transposes of the generators of the Clifford commutant, we derive the lower bound on the sample complexity. Marcel Hinsche, Jonas Helsen |
STOC | 2 |
| 2022 | The complexity of the vertex-minor problemabstractA graph H is a vertex-minor of a graph G if it can be reached from G by the successive application of local complementations and vertex deletions. Vertex-minors have been the subject of intense study in graph theory over the last decades and have found applications in other fields such as quantum information theory. Therefore it is natural to consider the computational complexity of deciding whether a given graph G has a vertex-minor isomorphic to another graph H. Here we prove that this decision problem is NP-complete, even when restricting H and G to be circle graphs, a class of graphs that has a natural relation to vertex-minors. Axel Dahlberg, Jonas Helsen, Stephanie Wehner |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 2 |