Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kaiwen Lin

dblp:221/3324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data fusion
conflict resolution
0.812024
Rock: Cleaning Data with both ML and Logic Rules · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution
0.812024
Rock: Cleaning Data with both ML and Logic Rules · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation
0.812024
Rock: Cleaning Data with both ML and Logic Rules · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic rules
0.212024
Rock: Cleaning Data with both ML and Logic Rules · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel algorithm · 1.5machine learning · 1.5logic rules · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Rock: Cleaning Data with both ML and Logic Rules
abstract
We demonstrate Rock, a system for cleaning relational data. Rock highlights the following unique features: (1) it extends logic rules by embedding machine learning models as predicates, to benefit from both ML and logic deduction; (2) it supports entity resolution, conflict resolution, timeliness deduction and missing data imputation in a unified process; and (3) it provides parallelly scalable algorithms for rule discovery, error detection and error correction, in batch and incremental modes. We will demonstrate Rock for its (a) easy-to-use interface, (b) scalability when cleaning large datasets, (c) accuracy for detecting and correcting errors across multiple tables, and (d) applications at banks and HR departments.
Zian Bao, Bie Binbin, Wenfei Fan, Daji Li, Mengyun Li, Kaiwen Lin, Zhicong Lv, Mingliang Ouyang, Chenyang Sun, Yaoshu Wang, Qiyuan Wei, Runxiao Zhao
Proc. VLDB Endow.6
2019 Accounting for Label Uncertainty in Machine Learning for Detection of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
abstract
When training a machine learning algorithm for a supervised-learning task in some clinical applications, uncertainty in the correct labels of some patients may adversely affect the performance of the algorithm. For example, even clinical experts may have less confidence when assigning a medical diagnosis to some patients because of ambiguity in the patient's case or imperfect reliability of the diagnostic criteria. As a result, some cases used in algorithm training may be mislabeled, adversely affecting the algorithm's performance. However, experts may also be able to quantify their diagnostic uncertainty in these cases. We present a robust method implemented with support vector machines (SVM) to account for such clinical diagnostic uncertainty when training an algorithm to detect patients who develop the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is a syndrome of the critically ill that is diagnosed using clinical criteria known to be imperfect. We represent uncertainty in the diagnosis of ARDS as a graded weight of confidence associated with each training label. We also performed a novel time-series sampling method to address the problem of intercorrelation among the longitudinal clinical data from each patient used in model training to limit overfitting. Preliminary results show that we can achieve meaningful improvement in the performance of algorithm to detect patients with ARDS on a hold-out sample, when we compare our method that accounts for the uncertainty of training labels with a conventional SVM algorithm.
Narathip Reamaroon, Michael W. Sjoding, Kaiwen Lin, Theodore J. Iwashyna, Kayvan Najarian
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics3