Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan

dblp:222/2163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0062-0866ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 28% Language models and text generation · 15%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
0.912025
iLLuMinaTE: An LLM-XAI Framework Leveraging Social Science Explanation Theories Towards Actionable Student Performance Feedback · AAAI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
explanation generation
0.912025
iLLuMinaTE: An LLM-XAI Framework Leveraging Social Science Explanation Theories Towards Actionable Student Performance Feedback · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
iLLuMinaTE: An LLM-XAI Framework Leveraging Social Science Explanation Theories Towards Actionable Student Performance Feedback · AAAI 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
character-level language modeling
0.612022
Signal in Noise: Exploring Meaning Encoded in Random Character Sequences with Character-Aware Language Models · ACL (1) 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.312017
Pycobra: A Python Toolbox for Ensemble Learning and Visualisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic representation
0.212022
Signal in Noise: Exploring Meaning Encoded in Random Character Sequences with Character-Aware Language Models · ACL (1) 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
visualization
0.112017
Pycobra: A Python Toolbox for Ensemble Learning and Visualisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.6chain-of-prompts · 2.6MC-LIME · 2.6LIME · 2.6counterfactual explanation · 1.7counterfactual explanations · 0.9character-aware language models · 0.6ensemble learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 iLLuMinaTE: An LLM-XAI Framework Leveraging Social Science Explanation Theories Towards Actionable Student Performance Feedback
abstract
Recent advances in eXplainable AI (XAI) for education have highlighted a critical challenge: ensuring that explanations for state-of-the-art models are understandable for non-technical users such as educators and students. In response, we introduce iLLuMinaTE, a zero-shot, chain-of-prompts LLM-XAI pipeline inspired by Miller (2019)'s cognitive model of explanation. iLLuMinaTE is designed to deliver theory-driven, actionable feedback to students in online courses. iLLuMinaTE navigates three main stages — causal connection, explanation selection, and explanation presentation — with variations drawing from eight social science theories (e.g. Abnormal Conditions, Pearl's Model of Explanation, Necessity and Robustness Selection, Contrastive Explanation). We extensively evaluate 21,915 natural language explanations of iLLuMinaTE extracted from three LLMs (GPT-4o, Gemma2-9B, Llama3-70B), with three different underlying XAI methods (LIME, Counterfactuals, MC-LIME), across students from three diverse online courses. Our evaluation involves analyses of explanation alignment to the social science theory, understandability of the explanation, and a real-world user preference study with 114 university students containing a novel actionability simulation. We find that students prefer iLLuMinaTE explanations over traditional explainers 89.52% of the time. Our work provides a robust, ready-to-use framework for effectively communicating hybrid XAI-driven insights in education, with significant generalization potential for other human-centric fields.
Vinitra Swamy, Davide Romano, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Oana-Maria Camburu, Tanja Käser
AAAI3
2022 Signal in Noise: Exploring Meaning Encoded in Random Character Sequences with Character-Aware Language Models
abstract
Mark Chu, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Ethan Nadler, Donald Ruggiero Lo Sardo, Elise Darragh-Ford, Douglas Guilbeault. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022.
Mark Chu, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Ethan O. Nadler, Donald Ruggiero Lo Sardo, Elise Darragh-Ford, Douglas Guilbeault
ACL (1)2
2020 comp-syn: Perceptually Grounded Word Embeddings with Color
abstract
Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Tasker Hull, Ethan Nadler, Douglas Guilbeault, Aabir Abubakar Kar, Mark Chu, Donald Ruggiero Lo Sardo. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2020.
Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Tasker Hull, Ethan O. Nadler, Douglas Guilbeault, Aabir Abubaker Kar, Mark Chu, Donald Ruggiero Lo Sardo
COLING1
2017 Pycobra: A Python Toolbox for Ensemble Learning and Visualisation
Benjamin Guedj, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2