Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alvaro Perez-Diaz
dblp:223/0200
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-8081-0772ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% Mathematical optimization · 25% Approximation and online algorithms · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Catching Cheats: Detecting Strategic Manipulation in Distributed Optimisation of Electric Vehicle Aggregators (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › fair-division mechanisms
online fair division |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fair Online Allocation of Perishable Goods and its Application to Electric Vehicle Charging · IJCAI 2019 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › algorithmic mechanism design
online mechanism design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fair Online Allocation of Perishable Goods and its Application to Electric Vehicle Charging · IJCAI 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online scheduling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fair Online Allocation of Perishable Goods and its Application to Electric Vehicle Charging · IJCAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
scheduling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fair Online Allocation of Perishable Goods and its Application to Electric Vehicle Charging · IJCAI 2019 |
Energy systems and smart grids
electric vehicle charging |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Fair Online Allocation of Perishable Goods and its Application to Electric Vehicle Charging · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.9online scheduling algorithms · 0.8envy-freeness · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Catching Cheats: Detecting Strategic Manipulation in Distributed Optimisation of Electric Vehicle Aggregators (Extended Abstract)abstractWe consider a scenario where self-interested Electric Vehicle (EV) aggregators compete in the day-ahead electricity market in order to purchase the electricity needed to meet EV requirements. We propose a novel decentralised bidding coordination algorithm based on the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). Our simulations using real market and driver data from Spain show that the algorithm is able to significantly reduce energy costs for all participants. Furthermore, we postulate that strategic manipulation by deviating agents is possible in decentralised algorithms like ADMM. Hence, we describe and analyse different possible attack vectors and propose a mathematical framework to quantify and detect manipulation. Our simulations show that our ADMM-based algorithm can be effectively disrupted by manipulative attacks achieving convergence to a different non-optimal solution which benefits the attacker. At the same time, our proposed manipulation detection algorithm achieves very high accuracy. Alvaro Perez-Diaz, Enrico H. Gerding, Frank McGroarty |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Catching Cheats: Detecting Strategic Manipulation in Distributed Optimisation of Electric Vehicle AggregatorsabstractGiven the rapid rise of electric vehicles (EVs) worldwide, and the ambitious targets set for the near future, the management of large EV fleets must be seen as a priority. Specifically, we study a scenario where EV charging is managed through self-interested EV aggregators who compete in the day-ahead market in order to purchase the electricity needed to meet their clients' requirements. With the aim of reducing electricity costs and lowering the impact on electricity markets, a centralised bidding coordination framework has been proposed in the literature employing a coordinator. In order to improve privacy and limit the need for the coordinator, we propose a reformulation of the coordination framework as a decentralised algorithm, employing the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). However, given the self-interested nature of the aggregators, they can deviate from the algorithm in order to reduce their energy costs. Hence, we study the strategic manipulation of the ADMM algorithm and, in doing so, describe and analyse different possible attack vectors and propose a mathematical framework to quantify and detect manipulation. Importantly, this detection framework is not limited to the considered EV scenario and can be applied to general ADMM algorithms. Finally, we test the proposed decentralised coordination and manipulation detection algorithms in realistic scenarios using real market and driver data from Spain. Our empirical results show that the decentralised algorithm's convergence to the optimal solution can be effectively disrupted by manipulative attacks achieving convergence to a different non-optimal solution which benefits the attacker. With respect to the detection algorithm, results indicate that it achieves very high accuracies and significantly outperforms a naive benchmark. Alvaro Perez-Diaz, Enrico H. Gerding, Frank McGroarty |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2019 | Fair Online Allocation of Perishable Goods and its Application to Electric Vehicle ChargingabstractWe consider mechanisms for the online allocation of perishable resources such as energy or computational power. A main application is electric vehicle charging where agents arrive and leave over time. Unlike previous work, we consider mechanisms without money, and a range of objectives including fairness and efficiency. In doing so, we extend the concept of envy-freeness to online settings. Furthermore, we explore the trade-offs between different objectives and analyse their theoretical properties both in online and offline settings. We then introduce novel online scheduling algorithms and compare them in terms of both their theoretical properties and empirical performance. Enrico H. Gerding, Alvaro Perez-Diaz, Haris Aziz 0001, Serge Gaspers, Antonia Marcu, Nicholas Mattei, Toby Walsh |
IJCAI | 2 |