Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Winder

dblp:223/2739 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 45% Graph learning · 23% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 13%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › geometric graph neural network
equivariant graph neural network
0.812024
Boosting Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Equivariance · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › robot policy learning
equivariant policy learning
0.812024
Boosting Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Equivariance · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
Boosting Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Equivariance · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.812024
Boosting Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Equivariance · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.722020
Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable Subtasks · AAAI 2020
Portable Option Discovery for Automated Learning Transfer in Object-Oriented Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › temporal abstraction
options
0.622019
The Expected-Length Model of Options · IJCAI 2019
Portable Option Discovery for Automated Learning Transfer in Object-Oriented Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.412020
Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable Subtasks · AAAI 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
stochastic shortest path
0.412019
The Expected-Length Model of Options · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
temporal abstraction
0.412019
The Expected-Length Model of Options · IJCAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
concept formation
0.212016
A Framework for Anomaly Reasoning: Interpretation through Concept Formation for Knowledge Transfer and Lifelong Learning · IJCAI 2016
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
lifelong learning
0.212016
A Framework for Anomaly Reasoning: Interpretation through Concept Formation for Knowledge Transfer and Lifelong Learning · IJCAI 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option discovery
0.212015
Portable Option Discovery for Automated Learning Transfer in Object-Oriented Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
transfer learning in reinforcement learning
0.212015
Portable Option Discovery for Automated Learning Transfer in Object-Oriented Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.112015
Portable Option Discovery for Automated Learning Transfer in Object-Oriented Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric deep learning · 0.8equivariant graph neural network · 0.8lifted abstract markov decision process · 0.4value function approximation · 0.4option models · 0.4concept formation · 0.2anomaly reasoning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Generative Artificial Intelligence for Behavioral Intent Prediction
Willa Mannering, Noah Ford, Justin J. Harsono, John Winder
CogSci4
2024 Boosting Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Equivariance
abstract
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) struggles with sample inefficiency and poor generalization [1]. These challenges are partially due to a lack of structure or inductive bias in the neural networks typically used in learning the policy. One such form of structure that is commonly observed in multi-agent scenarios is symmetry. The field of Geometric Deep Learning has developed Equivariant Graph Neural Networks (EGNN) that are equivariant (or symmetric) to rotations, translations, and reflections of nodes. Incorporating equivariance has been shown to improve learning efficiency and decrease error [ 2 ]. In this paper, we demonstrate that EGNNs improve the sample efficiency and generalization in MARL. However, we also show that a naive application of EGNNs to MARL results in poor early exploration due to a bias in the EGNN structure. To mitigate this bias, we present Exploration-enhanced Equivariant Graph Neural Networks or E2GN2. We compare E2GN2 to other common function approximators using common MARL benchmarks MPE and SMACv2. E2GN2 demonstrates a significant improvement in sample efficiency, greater final reward convergence, and a 2x-5x gain in over standard GNNs in our generalization tests. These results pave the way for more reliable and effective solutions in complex multi-agent systems.
Joshua McClellan, Naveed Haghani, John Winder, Furong Huang, Pratap Tokekar
NeurIPS3
2020 Planning with Abstract Learned Models While Learning Transferable Subtasks
abstract
We introduce an algorithm for model-based hierarchical reinforcement learning to acquire self-contained transition and reward models suitable for probabilistic planning at multiple levels of abstraction. We call this framework Planning with Abstract Learned Models (PALM). By representing subtasks symbolically using a new formal structure, the lifted abstract Markov decision process (L-AMDP), PALM learns models that are independent and modular. Through our experiments, we show how PALM integrates planning and execution, facilitating a rapid and efficient learning of abstract, hierarchical models. We also demonstrate the increased potential for learned models to be transferred to new and related tasks.
John Winder, Stephanie Milani, Matthew Landen, Erebus Oh, Shane Parr, Shawn Squire, Marie desJardins, Cynthia Matuszek
AAAI1
2019 The Expected-Length Model of Options
abstract
Effective options can make reinforcement learning easier by enhancing an agent's ability to both explore in a targeted manner and plan further into the future. However, learning an appropriate model of an option's dynamics in hard, requiring estimating a highly parameterized probability distribution. This paper introduces and motivates the Expected-Length Model (ELM) for options, an alternate model for transition dynamics. We prove ELM is a (biased) estimator of the traditional Multi-Time Model (MTM), but provide a non-vacuous bound on their deviation. We further prove that, in stochastic shortest path problems, ELM induces a value function that is sufficiently similar to the one induced by MTM, and is thus capable of supporting near-optimal behavior. We explore the practical utility of this option model experimentally, finding consistent support for the thesis that ELM is a suitable replacement for MTM. In some cases, we find ELM leads to more sample efficient learning, especially when options are arranged in a hierarchy.
David Abel, John Winder, Marie desJardins, Michael L. Littman
IJCAI2
2019 Segmentation of breast MR images using a generalised 2D mathematical model with inflation and deflation forces of active contours
Andrik Rampun, Bryan W. Scotney, Philip J. Morrow, Hui Wang 0001, John Winder
Artif. Intell. Medicine5
2017 Feature Construction for Controlling Swarms by Visual Demonstration
abstract
Agent-based modeling is a paradigm of modeling dynamic systems of interacting agents that are individually governed by specified behavioral rules. Training a model of such agents to produce an emergent behavior by specification of the emergent (as opposed to agent) behavior is easier from a demonstration perspective. While many approaches involve manual behavior specification via code or reliance on a defined taxonomy of possible behaviors, the meta-modeling framework in Miner [2010] generates mapping functions between agent-level parameters and swarm-level parameters, which are re-usable once generated. This work builds on that framework by integrating demonstration by image or video. The demonstrator specifies spatial motion of the agents over time and retrieves agent-level parameters required to execute that motion. The framework, at its core, uses computationally cheap image-processing algorithms. Our work is tested with a combination of primitive visual feature extraction methods (contour area and shape) and features generated using a pre-trained deep neural network in different stages of image featurization. The framework is also evaluated for its potential using complex visual features for all image featurization stages. Experimental results show significant coherence between demonstrated behavior and predicted behavior based on estimated agent-level parameters specific to the spatial arrangement of agents.
Karan Kumar Budhraja, John Winder, Tim Oates 0001
ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst.2
2016 A Framework for Anomaly Reasoning: Interpretation through Concept Formation for Knowledge Transfer and Lifelong Learning
John Winder
IJCAI1
2015 Portable Option Discovery for Automated Learning Transfer in Object-Oriented Markov Decision Processes
Nicholay Topin, Nicholas Haltmeyer, Shawn Squire, John Winder, Marie desJardins, James MacGlashan
IJCAI4