Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karl Hajjar
dblp:223/4801
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 83% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
infinite-width limit |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width Limit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network parameterization
maximal update parameterization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width Limit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › statistical physics of learning
mean-field analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width Limit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network parameterization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width Limit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width Limit · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian model · 1.0a/b testing · 1.0mean-field analysis · 0.8gradient descent · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width LimitabstractTo theoretically understand the behavior of trained deep neural networks, it is necessary to study the dynamics induced by gradient methods from a random initialization. However, the nonlinear and compositional structure of these models make these dynamics difficult to analyze. To overcome these challenges, large-width asymptotics have recently emerged as a fruitful viewpoint and led to practical insights on real-world deep networks. For two-layer neural networks, it has been understood via these asymptotics that the nature of the trained model radically changes depending on the scale of the initial random weights, ranging from a kernel regime (for large initial variance) to a feature learning regime (for small initial variance). For deeper networks more regimes are possible, and in this paper we study in detail a specific choice of "small" initialization corresponding to "mean-field" limits of neural networks, which we call integrable parameterizations (IPs). First, we show that under standard i.i.d. zero-mean initialization, integrable parameterizations of neural networks with more than four layers start at a stationary point in the infinite-width limit and no learning occurs. We then propose various methods to avoid this trivial behavior and analyze in detail the resulting dynamics. In particular, one of these methods consists in using large initial learning rates, and we show that it is equivalent to a modification of the recently proposed maximal update parameterization µP. We confirm our results with numerical experiments on image classification tasks, which additionally show a strong difference in behavior between various choices of activation functions that is not yet captured by theory. Karl Hajjar, Lénaïc Chizat, Christophe Giraud 0002 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | SizeFlags: Reducing Size and Fit Related Returns in Fashion E-CommerceabstractE-commerce is growing at an unprecedented rate and the fashion industry has recently witnessed a noticeable shift in customers' order behaviour towards stronger online shopping. However, fashion articles ordered online do not always find their way to a customer's wardrobe. In fact, a large share of them end up being returned. Finding clothes that fit online is very challenging and accounts for one of the main drivers of increased return rates in fashion e-commerce. Size and fit related returns severely impact 1. the customers experience and their dissatisfaction with online shopping, 2. the environment through an increased carbon footprint, and 3. the profitability of online fashion platforms. Due to poor fit, customers often end up returning articles that they like but do not fit them, which they have to re-order in a different size. To tackle this issue we introduce SizeFlags, a probabilistic Bayesian model based on weakly annotated large-scale data from customers. Leveraging the advantages of the Bayesian framework, we extend our model to successfully integrate rich priors from human experts feedback and computer vision intelligence. Through extensive experimentation, large-scale A/B testing and continuous evaluation of the model in production, we demonstrate the strong impact of the proposed approach in robustly reducing size-related returns in online fashion over~14~countries. Andrea Nestler, Nour Karessli, Karl Hajjar, Rodrigo Weffer, Reza Shirvany |
KDD | 3 |