Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marco Cognetta
dblp:223/4918
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 59% Machine translation · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automata and formal languages · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization › subword tokenization
subword regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Properties of Subword Regularization · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
subword tokenization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Properties of Subword Regularization · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
probabilistic automaton |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Infix Probability Computation for Probabilistic Finite Automata · ACL (1) 2019 |
Automata and formal languages
probabilistic automata |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Infix Probability Computation for Probabilistic Finite Automata · ACL (1) 2019 |
Automata and formal languages › probabilistic automata
probabilistic finite-state automata |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Incremental Computation of Infix Probabilities for Probabilistic Finite Automata · EMNLP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniform sampling · 0.8streaming computation · 0.8maxmatch · 0.8incremental algorithm · 0.8BPE · 0.8softened regex equivalence · 0.4neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The bread emoji Team's Submission to the 2025 FedCSIS Predicting Chess Puzzle Difficulty ChallengeabstractWe detail the bread emoji team's submission to the FedCSIS 2025 Predicting Chess Puzzle Difficulty Challenge.Our solution revolved around improving our submission from the previous competition by incorporating a new puzzle metadata feature and optimizing our implementation to allow for larger model ensembles and more stable training.Similar to our submission from last year, our system has two stages: learning a strong predictor for the LICHESS dataset and then rescaling the distribution using an empirically-guided post-processing step to fit it to the smaller and noisier competition dataset.Our submission placed second with a ∼ 3.9% gap in mean squared error (MSE) from first place [1]. 1 * This work is not related to the author's work at Amazon. Tyler Woodruff, Luke Imbing, Marco Cognetta |
FedCSIS | 3 |
| 2024 | The bread emoji Team's Submission to the IEEE BigData 2024 Cup: Predicting Chess Puzzle Difficulty ChallengeabstractWe detail the bread emoji team’s submission to the IEEE BigData 2024 Predicting Chess Puzzle Difficulty Challenge. Our solution revolved around the use of ensembled, pretrained, neural chessboard embedders (specifically, truncated Maia and Leela models) and an empirically-guided distribution rescaling postprocessing step.Our approach was the outright winner of the competition with a >16.4% reduction in mean squared error (MSE) over second place in the preliminary evaluation and a >13.3% reduction in MSE over second place in the final evaluation.1 Tyler Woodruff, Oleg Filatov, Marco Cognetta |
IEEE Big Data | 3 |
| 2024 | Two Counterexamples to Tokenization and the Noiseless ChannelabstractIn Tokenization and the Noiseless Channel (Zouhar et al., 2023), Rényi efficiency is suggested as an intrinsic mechanism for evaluating a tokenizer: for NLP tasks, the tokenizer which leads to the highest Rényi efficiency of the unigram distribution should be chosen. The Rényi efficiency is thus treated as a predictor of downstream performance (e.g., predicting BLEU for a machine translation task), without the expensive step of training multiple models with different tokenizers. Although useful, the predictive power of this metric is not perfect, and the authors note there are additional qualities of a good tokenization scheme that Rényi efficiency alone cannot capture. We describe two variants of BPE tokenization which can arbitrarily increase Rényi efficiency while decreasing the downstream model performance. These counterexamples expose cases where Rényi efficiency fails as an intrinsic tokenization metric and thus give insight for building more accurate predictors. Marco Cognetta, Vilém Zouhar, Sangwhan Moon, Naoaki Okazaki |
LREC/COLING | 1 |
| 2024 | Distributional Properties of Subword RegularizationabstractSubword regularization, used widely in NLP, improves model performance by reducing the dependency on exact tokenizations, augmenting the training corpus, and exposing the model to more unique contexts during training.BPE and MaxMatch, two popular subword tokenization schemes, have stochastic dropout regularization variants.However, there has not been an analysis of the distributions formed by them.We show that these stochastic variants are heavily biased towards a small set of tokenizations per word.If the benefits of subword regularization are as mentioned, we hypothesize that biasedness artificially limits the effectiveness of these schemes.Thus, we propose an algorithm to uniformly sample tokenizations that we use as a drop-in replacement for the stochastic aspects of existing tokenizers, and find that it improves machine translation quality. Marco Cognetta, Vilém Zouhar, Naoaki Okazaki |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Parameter-Efficient Korean Character-Level Language ModelingabstractCharacter-level language modeling has been shown empirically to perform well on highly agglutinative or morphologically rich languages while using only a small fraction of the parameters required by (sub)word models.Korean fits nicely into this framework, except that, like other CJK languages, it has a very large character vocabulary of 11,172 unique syllables.However, unlike Japanese Kanji and Chinese Hanzi, each Korean syllable can be uniquely factored into a small set of subcharacters, called jamo.We explore a "three-hot" scheme, where we exploit the decomposability of Korean characters to model at the syllable level but using only jamo-level representations.We find that our three-hot embedding and decoding scheme alleviates the two major issues with prior syllableand jamo-level models.Namely, it requires fewer than 1% of the embedding parameters of a syllable model, and it does not require tripling the sequence length, as with jamo models.In addition, it addresses a theoretical flaw in a prior three-hot modeling scheme.Our experiments show that, even when reducing the number of embedding parameters by > 99.6% (from 11.4M to just 36k), our model suffers no loss in translation quality compared to the baseline syllable model. Marco Cognetta, Sangwhan Moon, Lawrence Wolf-Sonkin, Naoaki Okazaki |
EACL | 1 |
| 2019 | Online Infix Probability Computation for Probabilistic Finite AutomataabstractProbabilistic finite automata (PFAs) are common statistical language model in natural language and speech processing.A typical task for PFAs is to compute the probability of all strings that match a query pattern.An important special case of this problem is computing the probability of a string appearing as a prefix, suffix, or infix.These problems find use in many natural language processing tasks such word prediction and text error correction.Recently, we gave the first incremental algorithm to efficiently compute the infix probabilities of each prefix of a string (Cognetta et al., 2018).We develop an asymptotic improvement of that algorithm and solve the open problem of computing the infix probabilities of PFAs from streaming data, which is crucial when processing queries online and is the ultimate goal of the incremental approach. Marco Cognetta, Yo-Sub Han, Soon Chan Kwon |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | SoftRegex: Generating Regex from Natural Language Descriptions using Softened Regex EquivalenceabstractJun-U Park, Sang-Ki Ko, Marco Cognetta, Yo-Sub Han. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Jun-U. Park, Sang-Ki Ko, Marco Cognetta, Yo-Sub Han |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2018 | Incremental Computation of Infix Probabilities for Probabilistic Finite AutomataabstractIn natural language processing, a common task is to compute the probability of a given phrase appearing or to calculate the probability of all phrases matching a given pattern.For instance, one computes affix (prefix, suffix, infix, etc.) probabilities of a string or a set of strings with respect to a probability distribution of patterns. Marco Cognetta, Yo-Sub Han, Soon Chan Kwon |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2018 | Online Stochastic Pattern Matching
Marco Cognetta, Yo-Sub Han |
CIAA | 1 |