Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mark Collier
dblp:223/9928 · also Mark Patrick Collier
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 36% Learning paradigms · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
2.5 | 4 | 2024 | Pi-DUAL: Using privileged information to distinguish clean from noisy labels · ICML 2024 When does Privileged information Explain Away Label Noise? · ICML 2023 Transfer and Marginalize: Explaining Away Label Noise with Privileged Information · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
privileged information |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | When does Privileged information Explain Away Label Noise? · ICML 2023 Transfer and Marginalize: Explaining Away Label Noise with Privileged Information · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
learning using privileged information |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pi-DUAL: Using privileged information to distinguish clean from noisy labels · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | When does Privileged information Explain Away Label Noise? · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Massively Scaling Heteroscedastic Classifiers · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Three Towers: Flexible Contrastive Learning with Pretrained Image Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › vision transformer
vision transformer scaling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transfer and Marginalize: Explaining Away Label Noise with Privileged Information · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Semantic Document Derendering: SVG Reconstruction via Vision-Language Modeling · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Pi-DUAL: Using privileged information to distinguish clean from noisy labels · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Three Towers: Flexible Contrastive Learning with Pretrained Image Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness trade-off
fairness-accuracy trade-off |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness and robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameters · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
large-scale image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Correlated Input-Dependent Label Noise in Large-Scale Image Classification · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 2.0iterative refinement · 2.0logit decomposition · 0.8gating mechanism · 0.8privileged information · 0.7linear probing on frozen features · 0.7learning shortcut · 0.7large-scale pretraining · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Semantic Document Derendering: SVG Reconstruction via Vision-Language ModelingabstractMultimedia documents such as slide presentations and posters are designed to be interactive and easy to modify. Yet, they are often distributed in a static raster format, which limits editing and customization. Restoring their editability requires converting these raster images back into structured vector formats. However, existing geometric raster vectorization methods, which rely on low-level primitives like curves and polygons, fall short at this task. Specifically, when applied to complex documents like slides, they fail to preserve the high-level structure, resulting in a flat collection of shapes where the semantic distinction between image and text elements is lost. To overcome this limitation, we address the problem of semantic document derendering by introducing SliDer, a novel framework that uses Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to derender slide images as compact and editable Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG) representations. SliDer detects and extracts the attributes from individual image and text elements in a raster input and organizes them into a coherent SVG format. Crucially, the model iteratively refines its predictions during inference in a process analogous to human design, generating SVG code that more faithfully reconstructs the original raster upon rendering. Furthermore, we introduce Slide2SVG, a novel dataset comprising raster-SVG pairs of slide documents curated from real-world scientific presentations, to facilitate future research in this domain. Our results demonstrate that SliDer achieves a reconstruction LPIPS of 0.069, and is favored by human evaluators in 82.9% of cases compared to the strongest zero-shot VLM baseline. Adam Hazimeh, Mark Collier, Gilles Baechler, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou, Pascal Frossard |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2024 | Pi-DUAL: Using privileged information to distinguish clean from noisy labelsabstractLabel noise is a pervasive problem in deep learning that often compromises the generalization performance of trained models. Recently, leveraging privileged information (PI) – information available only during training but not at test time – has emerged as an effective approach to mitigate this issue. Yet, existing PI-based methods have failed to consistently outperform their no-PI counterparts in terms of preventing overfitting to label noise. To address this deficiency, we introduce Pi-DUAL, an architecture designed to harness PI to distinguish clean from wrong labels. Pi-DUAL decomposes the output logits into a prediction term, based on conventional input features, and a noise-fitting term influenced solely by PI. A gating mechanism steered by PI adaptively shifts focus between these terms, allowing the model to implicitly separate the learning paths of clean and wrong labels. Empirically, Pi-DUAL achieves significant performance improvements on key PI benchmarks (e.g., +6.8% on ImageNet-PI), establishing a new state-of-the-art test set accuracy. Additionally, Pi-DUAL is a potent method for identifying noisy samples post-training, outperforming other strong methods at this task. Overall, Pi-DUAL is a simple, scalable and practical approach for mitigating the effects of label noise in a variety of real-world scenarios with PI. Guillermo Ortiz-Jiménez, Rodolphe Jenatton, Mark Collier, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou, Pascal Frossard |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Massively Scaling Heteroscedastic Classifiers
Mark Collier, Rodolphe Jenatton, Basil Mustafa, Neil Houlsby, Jesse Berent, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion ParametersabstractThe scaling of Transformers has driven breakthrough capabilities for language models. At present, the largest large language models (LLMs) contain upwards of 100B parameters. Vision Transformers (ViT) have introduced the same architecture to image and video modelling, but these have not yet been successfully scaled to nearly the same degree; the largest dense ViT contains 4B parameters (Chen et al., 2022). We present a recipe for highly efficient and stable training of a 22B-parameter ViT (ViT-22B) and perform a wide variety of experiments on the resulting model. When evaluated on downstream tasks (often with a lightweight linear model on frozen features), ViT-22B demonstrates increasing performance with scale. We further observe other interesting benefits of scale, including an improved tradeoff between fairness and performance, state-of-the-art alignment to human visual perception in terms of shape/texture bias, and improved robustness. ViT-22B demonstrates the potential for "LLM-like" scaling in vision, and provides key steps towards getting there. Mostafa Dehghani 0001, Josip Djolonga, Basil Mustafa, Piotr Padlewski, Jonathan Heek, Justin Gilmer, Andreas Steiner 0001, Mathilde Caron, Robert Geirhos, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Rodolphe Jenatton, Lucas Beyer, Michael Tschannen, Anurag Arnab, Xiao Wang 0038, Carlos Riquelme, Matthias Minderer, Joan Puigcerver, Utku Evci, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Gamaleldin F. Elsayed, Aravindh Mahendran, Fisher Yu 0001, Avital Oliver, Fantine Huot, Jasmijn Bastings, Mark Collier, Alexey A. Gritsenko, Vighnesh Birodkar, Cristina Nader Vasconcelos, Yi Tay, Thomas Mensink, Alexander Kolesnikov 0003, Filip Pavetic, Dustin Tran, Thomas Kipf, Mario Lucic, Xiaohua Zhai, Daniel Keysers, Jeremiah J. Harmsen, Neil Houlsby |
ICML | 28 |
| 2023 | When does Privileged information Explain Away Label Noise?abstractLeveraging privileged information (PI), or features available during training but not at test time, has recently been shown to be an effective method for addressing label noise. However, the reasons for its effectiveness are not well understood. In this study, we investigate the role played by different properties of the PI in explaining away label noise. Through experiments on multiple datasets with real PI (CIFAR-N/H) and a new large-scale benchmark ImageNet-PI, we find that PI is most helpful when it allows networks to easily distinguish clean from noisy data, while enabling a learning shortcut to memorize the noisy examples. Interestingly, when PI becomes too predictive of the target label, PI methods often perform worse than their no-PI baselines. Based on these findings, we propose several enhancements to the state-of-the-art PI methods and demonstrate the potential of PI as a means of tackling label noise. Finally, we show how we can easily combine the resulting PI approaches with existing no-PI techniques designed to deal with label noise. Guillermo Ortiz-Jiménez, Mark Collier, Anant Nawalgaria, Alexander D'Amour, Jesse Berent, Rodolphe Jenatton, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Three Towers: Flexible Contrastive Learning with Pretrained Image ModelsabstractWe introduce Three Towers (3T), a flexible method to improve the contrastive learning of vision-language models by incorporating pretrained image classifiers. While contrastive models are usually trained from scratch, LiT (Zhai et al., 2022) has recently shown performance gains from using pretrained classifier embeddings. However, LiT directly replaces the image tower with the frozen embeddings, excluding any potential benefits from training the image tower contrastively. With 3T, we propose a more flexible strategy that allows the image tower to benefit from both pretrained embeddings and contrastive training. To achieve this, we introduce a third tower that contains the frozen pretrained embeddings, and we encourage alignment between this third tower and the main image-text towers. Empirically, 3T consistently improves over LiT and the CLIP-style from-scratch baseline for retrieval tasks. For classification, 3T reliably improves over the from-scratch baseline, and while it underperforms relative to LiT for JFT-pretrained models, it outperforms LiT for ImageNet-21k and Places365 pretraining. Jannik Kossen, Mark Collier, Basil Mustafa, Xiao Wang 0038, Xiaohua Zhai, Lucas Beyer, Andreas Steiner 0001, Jesse Berent, Rodolphe Jenatton, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Transfer and Marginalize: Explaining Away Label Noise with Privileged InformationabstractSupervised learning datasets often have privileged information, in the form of features which are available at training time but are not available at test time e.g. the ID of the annotator that provided the label. We argue that privileged information is useful for explaining away label noise, thereby reducing the harmful impact of noisy labels. We develop a simple and efficient method for supervised learning with neural networks: it transfers via weight sharing the knowledge learned with privileged information and approximately marginalizes over privileged information at test time. Our method, TRAM (TRansfer and Marginalize), has minimal training time overhead and has the same test-time cost as not using privileged information. TRAM performs strongly on CIFAR-10H, ImageNet and Civil Comments benchmarks. Mark Collier, Rodolphe Jenatton, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou, Jesse Berent |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Correlated Input-Dependent Label Noise in Large-Scale Image ClassificationabstractLarge scale image classification datasets often contain noisy labels. We take a principled probabilistic approach to modelling input-dependent, also known as heteroscedastic, label noise in these datasets. We place a multivariate Nor-mal distributed latent variable on the final hidden layer of a neural network classifier. The covariance matrix of this latent variable, models the aleatoric uncertainty due to label noise. We demonstrate that the learned covariance structure captures known sources of label noise between semantically similar and co-occurring classes. Compared to standard neural network training and other baselines, we show significantly improved accuracy on Imagenet ILSVRC 2012 79.3% (+ 2.6%), Imagenet-21k 47.0% (+ 1.1%) and JFT 64.7% (+ 1.6%). We set a new state-of-the-art result on WebVision 1.0 with 76.6% top-1 accuracy. These datasets range from over 1M to over 300M training examples and from 1k classes to more than 21k classes. Our method is simple to use, and we provide an implementation that is a drop-in replacement for the final fully-connected layer in a deep classifier. Mark Collier, Basil Mustafa, Effrosyni Kokiopoulou, Rodolphe Jenatton, Jesse Berent |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2019 | Memory-Augmented Neural Networks for Machine Translation
Mark Collier, Jöran Beel |
MTSummit (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Implementing Neural Turing Machines
Mark Collier, Jöran Beel |
ICANN (3) | 1 |