Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rolf van Wegberg

dblp:224/9337 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
10since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-1491-9867ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 10 · 1 first-author · 9 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
10 papers
Usable security · 39% Systems and software security · 22% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 16%
Computer networks
3 papers
Network management and operations · 68% Network measurement and analytics · 32%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations
security operations
1.222026
"Tell Them They Are a Responsible Entity, Not a Customer": Understanding Practitioner Challenges in Sector CSIRTs · CHI 2026
The Unpatchables: Why Municipalities Persist in Running Vulnerable Hosts · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Usable security › security operations › security analytics › cyber threat intelligence
attack attribution
1.012026
APT to Disagree: A Comparative Analysis of Attribution in Commercial TI · SP 2026
Usable security › security operations › security analytics
cyber threat intelligence
1.012026
APT to Disagree: A Comparative Analysis of Attribution in Commercial TI · SP 2026
Usable security › security operations
incident response
1.012026
"Tell Them They Are a Responsible Entity, Not a Customer": Understanding Practitioner Challenges in Sector CSIRTs · CHI 2026
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
patch management
0.812024
The Unpatchables: Why Municipalities Persist in Running Vulnerable Hosts · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Systems and software security
vulnerability management
0.812024
The Unpatchables: Why Municipalities Persist in Running Vulnerable Hosts · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Empirical software engineering › practitioner studies
security practitioner study
0.512021
Risky Business? Investigating the Security Practices of Vendors on an Online Anonymous Market using Ground-Truth Data · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Malware analysis
cybercrime market
0.412020
Go See a Specialist? Predicting Cybercrime Sales on Online Anonymous Markets from Vendor and Product Characteristics · WWW 2020
Usable security › security operations › security analytics › cyber threat intelligence
advanced persistent threat attribution
0.312026
APT to Disagree: A Comparative Analysis of Attribution in Commercial TI · SP 2026
Usable security › organizational security
security practitioner studies
0.312026
"Tell Them They Are a Responsible Entity, Not a Customer": Understanding Practitioner Challenges in Sector CSIRTs · CHI 2026
Digital forensics and information hiding
cryptocurrency forensics
0.312025
Ghost Clusters: Evaluating Attribution of Illicit Services through Cryptocurrency Tracing · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Web and social media mining › e-commerce
online marketplace
0.212022
Measurement by Proxy: On the Accuracy of Online Marketplace Measurements · USENIX Security Symposium 2022
Web and mobile security
phishing
0.112021
Catching Phishers By Their Bait: Investigating the Dutch Phishing Landscape through Phishing Kit Detection · USENIX Security Symposium 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

validation workshop · 2.0interview study · 2.0empirical study · 1.5empirical measurement · 1.3comparative analysis · 1.0graph analysis · 0.9clustering · 0.9regression analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 "Tell Them They Are a Responsible Entity, Not a Customer": Understanding Practitioner Challenges in Sector CSIRTs
abstract
In this paper, we study the experiences of practitioners in sectoral Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs)—specialized teams that mediate between national cybersecurity authorities and the sector constituency. Through interviews with 18 professionals connected to the Informatiebeveiligingsdienst (IBD-CSIRT) for Dutch local governments, we uncover tensions in how key services are valued. For vulnerability notifications, while the CSIRT staff consider them a core service, many constituents hardly mention them, and systemic gaps in information forwarding mean that crucial alerts often never arrive. We extend these insights with 5 interviews across other sector CSIRTs and a validation workshop with 7 participants, all security officers from sector CSIRTs, revealing shared challenges in balancing technical expertise with sector knowledge, building trust-based relationships, and navigating institutional bottlenecks. Our findings contribute the first systematic account of how sector CSIRT professionals understand and perform their role, highlighting the tensions in providing sector-wide support to professionals with differing security needs.
Aksel Ethembabaoglu, Natalia Kadenko, Yana Angelova, Yury Zhauniarovich, Rolf van Wegberg, Simon Edward Parkin, Michel van Eeten
CHI5
2026 Tickets to Hide: An Inside Look into the Anti-Abuse Ecosystem through Internal Abuse Data
Hugo L. J. Bijmans, Michel van Eeten, Rolf van Wegberg
NDSS3
2026 APT to Disagree: A Comparative Analysis of Attribution in Commercial TI
Aksel Ethembabaoglu, Rolf van Wegberg, Yury Zhauniarovich, Michel van Eeten
SP2
2025 A Longitudinal Analysis of LockBit 3.0's Extortion Lifecycle and Response to Law Enforcement
abstract
In this study, we present a 532-day longitudinal analysis of LockBit 3.0’s leak site. We track 1,856 victims across multiple states-countdown, data publication, deletion, and relisting-and reconstruct a structured, three-stage extortion lifecycle: (1) pre-listing negotiation, (2) countdown negotiation, and (3) post-leak monetization. We find that $8.5 \%$ of countdownstate victims are deleted before their data is published, suggesting private settlements. In the post-leak phase, victims with price tags exhibit significantly more variable deletion timing compared to those without, despite sharing the same median exposure. This indicates that LockBit actively manages some listings after data publication, potentially extending monetization or negotiation efforts.We also measure the operational impact of law enforcement actions-including Operation Cronos and affiliate arrests-on LockBit’s infrastructure and victim activity. While the group rapidly restored services after takedowns, we observe a sustained decline in new victim onboarding, reduced infrastructure redundancy, and delayed payment behavior, suggesting long-term weakening.To our knowledge, this is the first empirical study to model a ransomware extortion lifecycle based on continuous monitoring of leak site behavior. Our findings provide actionable insights into ransomware monetization tactics, negotiation patterns, and post-takedown adaptation.
Yin Minn Pa Pa, Yuji Sekine, Yamato Kawaguchi, Tatsuki Yogo, Kelvin Lubbertsen, Rolf van Wegberg, Michel van Eeten, Katsunari Yoshioka
RAID6
2025 Ghost Clusters: Evaluating Attribution of Illicit Services through Cryptocurrency Tracing
Kelvin Lubbertsen, Michel van Eeten, Rolf van Wegberg
USENIX Security Symposium3
2024 The Unpatchables: Why Municipalities Persist in Running Vulnerable Hosts
Aksel Ethembabaoglu, Rolf van Wegberg, Yury Zhauniarovich, Michel van Eeten
USENIX Security Symposium2
2023 Mixed Signals: Analyzing Ground-Truth Data on the Users and Economics of a Bitcoin Mixing Service
Fieke Miedema, Kelvin Lubbertsen, Verena Schrama, Rolf van Wegberg
USENIX Security Symposium4
2022 Measurement by Proxy: On the Accuracy of Online Marketplace Measurements
Alejandro Cuevas Villalba, Fieke Miedema, Kyle Soska, Nicolas Christin, Rolf van Wegberg
USENIX Security Symposium5
2021 Catching Phishers By Their Bait: Investigating the Dutch Phishing Landscape through Phishing Kit Detection
Hugo L. J. Bijmans, Tim M. Booij, Anneke Schwedersky, Aria Nedgabat, Rolf van Wegberg
USENIX Security Symposium5
2021 Risky Business? Investigating the Security Practices of Vendors on an Online Anonymous Market using Ground-Truth Data
Jochem van de Laarschot, Rolf van Wegberg
USENIX Security Symposium2
2020 Go See a Specialist? Predicting Cybercrime Sales on Online Anonymous Markets from Vendor and Product Characteristics
abstract
Many cybercriminal entrepreneurs lack the skills and techniques to provision certain parts of their business model, leading them to outsource these parts to specialized criminal vendors. Online anonymous markets, from Silk Road to AlphaBay, have been used to search for these products and contract with their criminal vendors. While one listing of a product generates high sales numbers, another identical listing fails to sell. In this paper, we investigate which factors determine the performance of cybercrime products.
Rolf van Wegberg, Fieke Miedema, Ugur Akyazi, Arman Noroozian, Bram Klievink, Michel van Eeten
WWW1
2018 Plug and Prey? Measuring the Commoditization of Cybercrime via Online Anonymous Markets
Rolf van Wegberg, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Kyle Soska, Ugur Akyazi, Carlos Gañán, Bram Klievink, Nicolas Christin, Michel van Eeten
USENIX Security Symposium1