Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vivek K. Mishra

dblp:224/9789 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 50% Information theory · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › network coding
index coding
0.612022
Private Index Coding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022
Information theory › network information theory › multiuser capacity
rate region characterization
0.612022
Private Index Coding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secret sharing
0.212022
Private Index Coding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-sharing · 1.1linear coding · 1.1polymatroidal bounds · 0.6polymatroidal bound · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Private Index Coding
abstract
We study the fundamental problem of index coding under an additional privacy constraint that requires each receiver to learn nothing more about the collection of messages beyond its demanded messages from the server and what is available to it as side information. To enable such private communication, we allow the use of a collection of independent secret keys, each of which is shared amongst a subset of users and is known to the server. The goal is to study properties of the key access structures that make the problem feasible and then design encoding and decoding schemes efficient in the size of the server transmission as well as the sizes of the secret keys. We call this theprivate index codingproblem. We begin by characterizing the key access structures that make private index coding feasible. We also give conditions to check if a given linear scheme is a valid private index code. For up to three users, we characterize the rate region of feasible server transmission and key rates, and show that all feasible rates can be achieved using scalar linear coding and time sharing; we also show that scalar linear codes are sub-optimal for four receivers. The outer bounds used in the case of three users are extended to arbitrary number of users and seen as a generalized version of the well-known polymatroidal bounds for the standard non-private index coding. We also show that the presence of common randomness and private randomness does not change the rate region. Furthermore, we study the case where the server has the ability to multicast to any subset of users, and demonstrate how this flexibility can be used to provide privacy and characterize the minimum number of server multicasts required.
Varun Narayanan, Jithin Ravi, Vivek K. Mishra, Bikash Kumar Dey, Nikhil Karamchandani, Vinod M. Prabhakaran
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
2018 Private Index Coding
abstract
We study the problem of index coding under the privacy requirement that receivers do not learn anything more than the messages they already have as side information and the message they want from the server. To achieve this private index coding, we consider the use of secret keys that are shared among various subsets of users and the server. We characterize key access structures that allow private index coding. For up to three receivers, we characterize the rate region of transmission and key rates and show that scalar coding is optimal; we also show that scalar linear codes are sub-optimal for four receivers. Furthermore, when no keys are available, we consider a weaker notion of privacy analogous to weak security. Finally, for a different setting in which the server is allowed to send messages exclusively to a subset of users, we study the number of transmissions required to achieve error-free decoding and privacy.
Varun Narayanan, Vinod M. Prabhakaran, Jithin Ravi, Vivek K. Mishra, Bikash Kumar Dey, Nikhil Karamchandani
ISIT4