Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Panagiotis Kyriakis

dblp:225/3791 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
3D vision · 24% Generative modeling · 24% Efficient and distributed learning · 14%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › distributed training systems
device placement
0.812024
A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.812024
A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
brain decoding
0.712023
Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › brain decoding
fMRI-to-image reconstruction
0.712023
Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
hierarchical VAE
0.712023
Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.712023
Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy adaptation
0.612022
Pareto Policy Adaptation · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning
0.512021
Learning Hyperbolic Representations of Topological Features · ICLR 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
topological descriptors
0.512021
Learning Hyperbolic Representations of Topological Features · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
visual representation
0.212023
Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.3topological data analysis · 1.0hyperbolic embedding · 1.0policy optimization · 0.8graph parsing network · 0.8graph coarsening · 0.8latent variable modeling · 0.7hierarchical variational autoencoder · 0.7multi-objective optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs
abstract
Computation graphs are Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) where the nodes correspond to mathematical operations and are used widely as abstractions in optimizations of neural networks. The device placement problem aims to identify optimal allocations of those nodes to a set of (potentially heterogeneous) devices. Existing approaches rely on two types of architectures known as grouper-placer and encoder-placer, respectively. In this work, we bridge the gap between encoder-placer and grouper-placer techniques and propose a novel framework for the task of device placement, relying on smaller computation graphs extracted from the OpenVINO toolkit. The framework consists of five steps, including graph coarsening, node representation learning and policy optimization. It facilitates end-to-end training and takes into account the DAG nature of the computation graphs. We also propose a model variant, inspired by graph parsing networks and complex network analysis, enabling graph representation learning and jointed, personalized graph partitioning, using an unspecified number of groups. To train the entire framework, we use reinforcement learning using the execution time of the placement as a reward. We demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of our approach through multiple experiments with three benchmark models, namely Inception-V3, ResNet, and BERT. The robustness of the proposed framework is also highlighted through an ablation study. The suggested placements improve the inference speed for the benchmark models by up to $58.2\%$ over CPU execution and by up to $60.24\%$ compared to other commonly used baselines.
Shukai Duan 0002, Heng Ping, Nikos Kanakaris, Xiongye Xiao, Panagiotis Kyriakis, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Peiyu Zhang 0002, Guixiang Ma, Mihai Capota, Shahin Nazarian, Theodore L. Willke, Paul Bogdan
NeurIPS5
2023 Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli
abstract
Reconstructing natural images from fMRI recordings is a challenging task of great importance in neuroscience. The current architectures are bottlenecked because they fail to effectively capture the hierarchical processing of visual stimuli that takes place in the human brain. Motivated by that fact, we introduce a novel neural network architecture for the problem of neural decoding. Our architecture uses Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders (HVAEs) to learn meaningful representations of natural images and leverages their latent space hierarchy to learn voxel-to-image mappings. By mapping the early stages of the visual pathway to the first set of latent variables and the higher visual cortex areas to the deeper layers in the latent hierarchy, we are able to construct a latent variable neural decoding model that replicates the hierarchical visual information processing. Our model achieves better reconstructions compared to the state of the art and our ablation study indicates that the hierarchical structure of the latent space is responsible for that performance.
Eleni Miliotou, Panagiotis Kyriakis, Jason D. Hinman, Andrei Irimia, Paul Bogdan
ICML2
2022 Pareto Policy Adaptation
Panagiotis Kyriakis, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, Paul Bogdan
ICLR1
2021 Learning Hyperbolic Representations of Topological Features
Panagiotis Kyriakis, Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Paul Bogdan
ICLR1
2019 Specification Mining and Robust Design under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Temporal Logic Approach
abstract
In this paper, we propose Stochastic Temporal Logic (StTL) as a formalism for expressing probabilistic specifications on time-varying behaviors of controlled stochastic dynamical systems. To make StTL a more effective specification formalism, we introduce the quantitative semantics for StTL to reason about the robust satisfaction of an StTL specification by a given system. Additionally, we propose using the robustness value as the objective function to be maximized by a stochastic optimization algorithm for the purpose of controller design. Finally, we formulate an algorithm for parameter inference for Parameteric-StTL specifications, which allows specifications to be mined from output traces of the underlying system. We demonstrate and validate our framework on two case studies inspired by the automotive domain.
Panagiotis Kyriakis, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, Paul Bogdan
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.1