Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Panagiotis Kyriakis
dblp:225/3791
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
3D vision · 24% Generative modeling · 24% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › distributed training systems
device placement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation Graphs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
brain decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › brain decoding
fMRI-to-image reconstruction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
hierarchical VAE |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Pareto Policy Adaptation · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Hyperbolic Representations of Topological Features · ICLR 2021 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
topological descriptors |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Hyperbolic Representations of Topological Features · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
visual representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Generative Decoding of Visual Stimuli · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.3topological data analysis · 1.0hyperbolic embedding · 1.0policy optimization · 0.8graph parsing network · 0.8graph coarsening · 0.8latent variable modeling · 0.7hierarchical variational autoencoder · 0.7multi-objective optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Structure-Aware Framework for Learning Device Placements on Computation GraphsabstractComputation graphs are Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) where the nodes correspond to mathematical operations and are used widely as abstractions in optimizations of neural networks. The device placement problem aims to identify optimal allocations of those nodes to a set of (potentially heterogeneous) devices. Existing approaches rely on two types of architectures known as grouper-placer and encoder-placer, respectively. In this work, we bridge the gap between encoder-placer and grouper-placer techniques and propose a novel framework for the task of device placement, relying on smaller computation graphs extracted from the OpenVINO toolkit. The framework consists of five steps, including graph coarsening, node representation learning and policy optimization. It facilitates end-to-end training and takes into account the DAG nature of the computation graphs. We also propose a model variant, inspired by graph parsing networks and complex network analysis, enabling graph representation learning and jointed, personalized graph partitioning, using an unspecified number of groups. To train the entire framework, we use reinforcement learning using the execution time of the placement as a reward. We demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of our approach through multiple experiments with three benchmark models, namely Inception-V3, ResNet, and BERT. The robustness of the proposed framework is also highlighted through an ablation study. The suggested placements improve the inference speed for the benchmark models by up to $58.2\%$ over CPU execution and by up to $60.24\%$ compared to other commonly used baselines. Shukai Duan 0002, Heng Ping, Nikos Kanakaris, Xiongye Xiao, Panagiotis Kyriakis, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Peiyu Zhang 0002, Guixiang Ma, Mihai Capota, Shahin Nazarian, Theodore L. Willke, Paul Bogdan |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Generative Decoding of Visual StimuliabstractReconstructing natural images from fMRI recordings is a challenging task of great importance in neuroscience. The current architectures are bottlenecked because they fail to effectively capture the hierarchical processing of visual stimuli that takes place in the human brain. Motivated by that fact, we introduce a novel neural network architecture for the problem of neural decoding. Our architecture uses Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders (HVAEs) to learn meaningful representations of natural images and leverages their latent space hierarchy to learn voxel-to-image mappings. By mapping the early stages of the visual pathway to the first set of latent variables and the higher visual cortex areas to the deeper layers in the latent hierarchy, we are able to construct a latent variable neural decoding model that replicates the hierarchical visual information processing. Our model achieves better reconstructions compared to the state of the art and our ablation study indicates that the hierarchical structure of the latent space is responsible for that performance. Eleni Miliotou, Panagiotis Kyriakis, Jason D. Hinman, Andrei Irimia, Paul Bogdan |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Pareto Policy Adaptation
Panagiotis Kyriakis, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, Paul Bogdan |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning Hyperbolic Representations of Topological Features
Panagiotis Kyriakis, Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Paul Bogdan |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Specification Mining and Robust Design under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Temporal Logic ApproachabstractIn this paper, we propose Stochastic Temporal Logic (StTL) as a formalism for expressing probabilistic specifications on time-varying behaviors of controlled stochastic dynamical systems. To make StTL a more effective specification formalism, we introduce the quantitative semantics for StTL to reason about the robust satisfaction of an StTL specification by a given system. Additionally, we propose using the robustness value as the objective function to be maximized by a stochastic optimization algorithm for the purpose of controller design. Finally, we formulate an algorithm for parameter inference for Parameteric-StTL specifications, which allows specifications to be mined from output traces of the underlying system. We demonstrate and validate our framework on two case studies inspired by the automotive domain. Panagiotis Kyriakis, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, Paul Bogdan |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 1 |