Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ivo Petrov
dblp:225/9294
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 87% Graph learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › federated learning privacy
gradient inversion attack |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | GRAIN: Exact Graph Reconstruction from Gradients · ICLR 2025 DAGER: Exact Gradient Inversion for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MathConstruct: Challenging LLM Reasoning with Constructive Proofs · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models › reasoning evaluation
mathematical reasoning benchmark |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MathConstruct: Challenging LLM Reasoning with Constructive Proofs · ICML 2025 |
Logic in computer science › proof theory
constructive proof |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MathConstruct: Challenging LLM Reasoning with Constructive Proofs · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DAGER: Exact Gradient Inversion for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GRAIN: Exact Graph Reconstruction from Gradients · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
problem variation generation · 1.7low-rank reconstruction · 1.7gradient inversion · 1.7automated verification · 1.7self-attention gradient analysis · 0.8greedy search · 0.8exhaustive heuristic search · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GRAIN: Exact Graph Reconstruction from GradientsabstractFederated learning claims to enable collaborative model training among multiple clients with data privacy by transmitting gradient updates instead of the actual client data. However, recent studies have shown the client privacy is still at risk due to the, so called, gradient inversion attacks which can precisely reconstruct clients' text and image data from the shared gradient updates. While these attacks demonstrate severe privacy risks for certain domains and architectures, the vulnerability of other commonly-used data types, such as graph-structured data, remain under-explored. To bridge this gap, we present GRAIN, the first exact gradient inversion attack on graph data in the honest-but-curious setting that recovers both the structure of the graph and the associated node features. Concretely, we focus on Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) and Graph Attention Networks (GAT) -- two of the most widely used frameworks for learning on graphs. Our method first utilizes the low-rank structure of GNN gradients to efficiently reconstruct and filter the client subgraphs which are then joined to complete the input graph. We evaluate our approach on molecular, citation, and social network datasets using our novel metric.
We show that GRAIN reconstructs up to 80\% of all graphs exactly, significantly outperforming the baseline, which achieves up to 20\% correctly positioned nodes. Maria Drencheva, Ivo Petrov, Maximilian Baader, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Martin T. Vechev |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | MathConstruct: Challenging LLM Reasoning with Constructive ProofsabstractWhile Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in mathematics, existing math benchmarks come with significant limitations. Many focus on problems with fixed ground-truth answers, and are often saturated due to problem simplicity or the viability of guessing or memorization. Crucially, they capture only a narrow subset of relevant math problems. To address this research gap, we introduce MathConstruct, a new benchmark of 127 challenging problems sourced from various math competitions, which targets constructive proofs, a widely encountered problem type requiring the construction of mathematical objects with specific properties. These proofs are particularly suitable for LLM evaluation, as solution correctness can be easily verified. Our automated verifiers also enable MathConstruct to generate problem variations, used to evaluate robustness. State-of-the-art LLMs solve only 41% of MathConstruct problems, highlighting its complexity and importance for LLM evaluation. Mislav Balunovic, Jasper Dekoninck, Nikola Jovanovic 0001, Ivo Petrov, Martin T. Vechev |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math CompetitionsabstractThe rapid advancement of reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) has led to notable improvements on mathematical benchmarks. However, many of the most commonly used evaluation datasets (e.g., AIME 2024) are widely available online, making it difficult to disentangle genuine reasoning from potential memorization. Furthermore, these benchmarks do not evaluate proof-writing capabilities, which are crucial for many mathematical tasks.To address this, we introduce MathArena, a new benchmark based on the following key insight: recurring math competitions provide a stream of high-quality, challenging problems that can be used for real-time evaluation of LLMs. By evaluating models as soon as new problems are released, we effectively eliminate the risk of contamination.Using this framework, we find strong signs of contamination in AIME 2024. Nonetheless, evaluations on harder competitions, such as CMIMC 2025, demonstrate impressive reasoning capabilities in top-performing models.MathArena is also the first benchmark for proof-writing capabilities. On IMO 2025, top models achieve slightly less than 40\%, demonstrating both notable progress and significant room for improvement.So far, we have evaluated over $50$ models across seven competitions, totaling $162$ problems. As an evolving benchmark, MathArena will continue to track the progress of LLMs on newly released competitions, ensuring rigorous and up-to-date evaluation of mathematical reasoning. Mislav Balunovic, Jasper Dekoninck, Ivo Petrov, Nikola Jovanovic 0001, Martin T. Vechev |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | DAGER: Exact Gradient Inversion for Large Language ModelsabstractFederated learning works by aggregating locally computed gradients from multiple clients, thus enabling collaborative training without sharing private client data. However, prior work has shown that the data can actually be recovered by the server using so-called gradient inversion attacks. While these attacks perform well when applied on images, they are limited in the text domain and only permit approximate reconstruction of small batches and short input sequences. In this work, we propose DAGER, the first algorithm to recover whole batches of input text exactly. DAGER leverages the low-rank structure of self-attention layer gradients and the discrete nature of token embeddings to efficiently check if a given token sequence is part of the client data. We use this check to exactly recover full batches in the honest-but-curious setting without any prior on the data for both encoder and decoder-based architectures using exhaustive heuristic search and a greedy approach, respectively. We provide an efficient GPU implementation of DAGER and show experimentally that it recovers full batches of size up to 128 on large language models (LLMs), beating prior attacks in speed (20x at same batch size), scalability (10x larger batches), and reconstruction quality (ROUGE-1/2 > 0.99). Ivo Petrov, Dimitar I. Dimitrov, Maximilian Baader, Mark Niklas Müller, Martin T. Vechev |
NeurIPS | 1 |